23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In vitro embryo production in small ruminants: what is still missing?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In vitro embryo production (IVEP) is an extremely important tool for genetic improvement in livestock and it is the biotechnology that has grown the most recently. However, multiple ovulation followed by embryo transfer is still considered the leading biotechnology for embryo production in small ruminants. This review aimed to identify what is still missing for more efficient diffusion of IVEP in small ruminants, going through the IVEP steps and highlighting the main factors affecting the outcomes. Oocyte quality is essential for the success of IVEP and an aspect to be considered in small ruminants is their reproductive seasonality and strategies to mitigate the effect of season. The logistics for oocyte collection from live females is more complex than in cattle, and tools to simplify this collection system and/or to promote an alternative way of recovering oocytes may be an important point in this scenario. The heterogeneity of oocytes collected from growing follicles in live females or from ovaries collected from abattoirs remains a challenge, and there is a demand to standardize/homogenize the hormonal stimulatory protocols and IVM protocols for each source of oocytes. The use of sexed semen is technically possible, however the low market demand associated with the high costs of the sexing process prevents the routine use of this technique, but its higher availability is an important aspect aiming for greater dissemination of IVEP. New noninvasive approaches for embryo selection are key factors since the selection for transfer or cryopreservation is another difficulty faced among laboratories. Embryo selection is based on morphological traits, although these are not necessarily reliable in predicting pregnancy. Several issues described in this review must be considered by researchers in other to promote the diffusion of IVEP in small ruminants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references183

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality.

          The ability of a bovine embryo to develop to the blastocyst stage, to implant and to generate a healthy offspring is not a simple process. To clarify the importance of the contribution of the oocyte to the embryo quality, it is important to define more precisely the different types of competence expressed by oocytes. The ability to resume meiosis, to cleave upon fertilization to develop into a blastocyst, to induce pregnancy and to generate an healthy offspring are all separate events and succeeding in the first events does not ensure the success of subsequent ones. Furthermore, these events are associated with the three types of maturation processes observed in the oocyte: meiotic, cytoplasmic and molecular. These abilities vary also upon the type of follicle the oocytes is removed from. Larger or slow-growing follicles have been shown to foster better eggs than small or actively growing follicles. Hormonal stimulation can also affect oocyte competence with the nature of the effect (positive or negative) depending on timing and dose. This complex situation requires better definition of the contribution of each factor affecting the oocyte competence and the resulting embryo quality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: a comparison of several species.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts.

              Mammalian preimplantation embryos normally develop within the protected environment of the female reproductive tract, which virtually precludes studies on embryogenesis in situ. Information must therefore be derived from experiments on cultured embryos. Consequently, studies on the epigenetic regulation of embryogenesis have long been interwoven with efforts to formulate culture media capable of sustaining normal development. In this review, comparative information on epigenetic regulation of embryo development is discussed, including information on energy substrate and amino acid preferences of embryos. Advantages of simple versus complex culture media, and of substituting serum albumin or synthetic macromolecules for serum, are discussed. Some potential pitfalls of co-culture are described. Culture appears to induce anomalies in embryo metabolism, which may derive from disturbed intracellular pH. Rationales for selecting endpoints to evaluate the outcome of experiments are considered, including incorporation of timing of embryo development into the analysis. Poor experimental design and/or data analysis can detract from or even negate the value of data obtained from embryo culture; examples are examined to help correct this problem. All of these points are discussed with a view to using data on the needs of embryos for making improvements in the design of culture media, so that higher yields and increased viability of embryos are achieved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: conceptualizationRole: funding acquisitionRole: supervisionRole: writing review and editing
                Role: writing original draftRole: investigationRole: writing review and editing
                Role: writing original draftRole: visualizationRole: investigation
                Role: writing original draftRole: data curation
                Role: conceptualizationRole: writing review editing
                Role: writing original draftRole: supervisionRole: writing review and editing
                Journal
                Anim Reprod
                Anim Reprod
                ar
                Animal Reproduction
                Colégio Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal
                1806-9614
                1984-3143
                10 November 2023
                2023
                : 20
                : 3
                : e20230055
                Affiliations
                [1 ] originalFaculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil
                [2 ] originalLaboratório de Fisiologia e Controle da Reprodução, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: joannavet@ 123456gmail.com

                Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4872-1718
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2167-8780
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4839-3427
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4938-2655
                http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7030-4984
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-0880
                Article
                arAR20230055_EN 00400
                10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0055
                10681138
                38025995
                fda405ee-8f5b-4367-bf5d-2346384d7acb

                Copyright © The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 April 2023
                : 18 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 175
                Funding
                Funded by: CNPq
                Award ID: 001
                Funded by: Capes
                Award ID: 001
                Categories
                Review Article

                goat,ivm,ivc,sheep
                goat, ivm, ivc, sheep

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content255

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors1,706