Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery may be performed either with cardiopulmonary bypass (on pump) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (off pump). We report the 5-year clinical outcomes in patients who had been included in the Veterans Affairs trial of on-pump versus off-pump CABG.

Related collections

Most cited references 28

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting

Anil R Jain, P.J. Devereaux, David Taggart … (2016)

We previously reported that there was no significant difference at 30 days or at 1 year in the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure between patients who underwent coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed with a beating-heart technique (off-pump) and those who underwent CABG performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump). We now report the results at 5 years (the end of the trial).

0 comments Cited 107 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year.

Andre Lamy, P.J. Devereaux, Dorairaj Prabhakaran … (2013)

Previously, we reported that there was no significant difference at 30 days in the rate of a primary composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new renal failure requiring dialysis between patients who underwent coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed with a beating-heart technique (off-pump) and those who underwent CABG performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump). We now report results on quality of life and cognitive function and on clinical outcomes at 1 year. We enrolled 4752 patients with coronary artery disease who were scheduled to undergo CABG and randomly assigned them to undergo the procedure off-pump or on-pump. Patients were enrolled at 79 centers in 19 countries. We assessed quality of life and cognitive function at discharge, at 30 days, and at 1 year and clinical outcomes at 1 year. At 1 year, there was no significant difference in the rate of the primary composite outcome between off-pump and on-pump CABG (12.1% and 13.3%, respectively; hazard ratio with off-pump CABG, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.07; P=0.24). The rate of the primary outcome was also similar in the two groups in the period between 31 days and 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.13; P=0.19). The rate of repeat coronary revascularization at 1 year was 1.4% in the off-pump group and 0.8% in the on-pump group (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.89; P=0.07). There were no significant differences between the two groups at 1 year in measures of quality of life or neurocognitive function. At 1 year after CABG, there was no significant difference between off-pump and on-pump CABG with respect to the primary composite outcome, the rate of repeat coronary revascularization, quality of life, or neurocognitive function. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; CORONARY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00463294.).

0 comments Cited 94 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.

Steven T. Taylor, Raimondo Ascione, Barnaby Reeves … (2002)

Although no randomised controlled trial has assessed the midterm effects of coronary-artery bypass surgery on the beating heart, this technique is being used in more and more patients. We did two randomised trials to compare the short-term morbidity associated with off-pump and on-pump myocardial revascularisation. Our aim was to pool the results to assess midterm outcomes. From March, 1997, to November, 1999, we randomly allocated 200 patients to off-pump and 201 to on-pump coronary surgery. In Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Study (BHACAS) 1, we excluded patients who had had myocardial infarction in the past month or who required grafting of the circumflex artery distal to the first obtuse marginal branch. In BHACAS 2, we included such patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiac-related events at midterm follow-up (1-3 years). Analysis was by intention to treat. Analyses of combined data from both trials showed the following risk differences with off-pump compared with on-pump surgery: atrial fibrillation -25% (95% CI -33% to -16%); chest infection -12% (-19% to -5%); inotropic requirement -18% (-25% to -10%); transfusion of red blood cells -31% (-41 to -21); and hospital stay longer than 7 days -13% (-21 to -5). Mean follow-up was 25 0 months (SD 9.1) for BHACAS 1 and 13.7 months (5 5) for BHACAS 2. Four (2%) of 200 patients in the off-pump groups died from any cause, compared with seven (3%) of 201 in the on-pump group (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.17-1.96). 33 (17%) of 200 patients in the off-pump group died or had a cardiac-related event, compared with 42 (21%) of 201 in the on-pump group (0.78, 0 49-1.22). Off-pump coronary surgery significantly lowers in-hospital morbidity without compromising outcome in the first 1-3 years after surgery compared with conventional on-pump coronary surgery.

0 comments Cited 52 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Title: New England Journal of Medicine

Abbreviated Title: N Engl J Med

Publisher: New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS)

ISSN (Print): 0028-4793

ISSN (Electronic): 1533-4406

Publication date Created: August 17 2017

Publication date (Print): August 17 2017

Volume: 377

Issue: 7

Pages: 623-632

Article

DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614341

PubMed ID: 28813218

SO-VID: fda3fbab-7eb8-4444-b0a9-fe09ba4ce81b

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Most cited references 28

Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting

Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year.

Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.

Author and article information

Journal

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 2,265

Cited by 84

Most referenced authors 516