5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      SARS-CoV-2-infection- and vaccine-induced antibody responses are long lasting with an initial waning phase followed by a stabilization phase

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          SUMMARY

          It is thought that mRNA-based vaccine-induced immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) wanes quickly, based mostly on short-term studies. Here, we analyzed the kinetics and durability of the humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination using >8,000 longitudinal samples collected over a 3-year period in New York City. Upon primary immunization, participants with pre-existing immunity mounted higher antibody responses faster and achieved higher steady-state antibody titers than naive individuals. Antibody kinetics were characterized by two phases: an initial rapid decay, followed by a stabilization phase with very slow decay. Booster vaccination equalized the differences in antibody concentration between participants with and without hybrid immunity, but the peak antibody titers decreased with each successive antigen exposure. Breakthrough infections increased antibodies to similar titers as an additional vaccine dose in naive individuals. Our study provides strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses are long lasting, with initial waning followed by stabilization.

          In brief

          SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccine-induced immunity is thought to wane quickly based on short-term studies. Using longitudinal data, Srivastava et al. find that participants with hybrid immunity show faster, higher antibody responses after initial vaccination, but boosters evened out differences. Modeling of antibody kinetics revealed an initial rapid decay followed by a stabilization phase, challenging the idea that vaccine immunity fades quickly.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python

            SciPy is an open-source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. Since its initial release in 2001, SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100,000 dependent repositories and millions of downloads per year. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of SciPy 1.0 and highlight some recent technical developments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9432918
                8591
                Immunity
                Immunity
                Immunity
                1074-7613
                1097-4180
                7 April 2024
                12 March 2024
                22 February 2024
                03 May 2024
                : 57
                : 3
                : 587-599.e4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [2 ]Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness (C-VARPP), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [4 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [5 ]The Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [6 ]Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [7 ]Icahn Genomics Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
                [8 ]These authors contributed equally
                [9 ]Lead contact
                Author notes

                AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

                V.S. and F.K. conceived the study. K.S., V.S., and C.G. designed and developed the clinical study methodology for recruitment, data collection, survey instruments, and study visits. A.R., J.T., A.A., B.M., G.S., and J.M.C. performed and supervised the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 ELISA. J.M.C., G.S., A.A., J.T., and A.R. curated antibody testing results. C.G., V.S., and F.K. conceptualized the antibody kinetic model. C.G. and B.M. created and tested the PARIS model family. C.G. and K.S. maintained and curated qualitative study data and vaccination and infection histories of participants. V.S., H.v.B., and E.M.S. provided information on viral variants. K.S. and V.S. supervised the PARIS study, monitoring study progress and operations. G.K. managed biospecimen processing and bio-banking for the PARIS study. F.K. and V.S. secured funding. V.S., K.S., C.G., F.K., J.M.C., B.M., and G.S. analyzed the data. C.G., V.S., B.M., and K.S. prepared and created figure and table visualizations. The members of the PARIS study group provided expert support with participant recruitment, follow-ups, biospecimen processing, and performing antibody measurements. V.S., F.K., K.S., C.G., and B.M. wrote the first manuscript draft, and all authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript version.

                Article
                NIHMS1980262
                10.1016/j.immuni.2024.01.017
                11066813
                38395697
                fd94d0c9-c760-4b85-92d8-3b04e3e24d94

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Immunology
                Immunology

                Comments

                Comment on this article