53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Optimized Treatment of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction : The Unmet Need to Target Coronary Microvascular Obstruction as Primary Treatment Goal to Further Improve Prognosis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is nowadays the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients with acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, aiming at restoring epicardial infarct-related artery patency and achieving microvascular reperfusion as early as possible, thus limiting the extent of irreversibly injured myocardium. Yet, in a sizeable proportion of patients, primary percutaneous coronary intervention does not achieve effective myocardial reperfusion due to the occurrence of coronary microvascular obstruction (MVO). The amount of infarcted myocardium, the so-called infarct size, has long been known to be an independent predictor for major adverse cardiovascular events and adverse left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Previous cardioprotection studies were mainly aimed at protecting cardiomyocytes and reducing infarct size. However, several clinical and preclinical studies have reported that the presence and extent of MVO represent another important independent predictor of adverse left ventricular remodeling, and recent evidences support the notion that MVO may be more predictive of major adverse cardiovascular events than infarct size itself. Although timely and complete reperfusion is the most effective way of limiting myocardial injury and subsequent ventricular remodeling, the translation of effective therapeutic strategies into improved clinical outcomes has been largely disappointing. Of importance, despite the presence of a large number of studies focused on infarct size, only few cardioprotection studies addressed MVO as a therapeutic target. In this review, we provide a detailed summary of MVO including underlying causes, diagnostic techniques, and current therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, we discuss the hypothesis that simultaneously addressing infarct size and MVO may help to translate cardioprotective strategies into improved clinical outcome following ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Door-to-balloon time and mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI.

          Current guidelines for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction recommend a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes or less for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Door-to-balloon time has become a performance measure and is the focus of regional and national quality-improvement initiatives. However, it is not known whether national improvements in door-to-balloon times have been accompanied by a decline in mortality. We analyzed annual trends in door-to-balloon times and in-hospital mortality using data from 96,738 admissions for patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from July 2005 through June 2009 at 515 hospitals participating in the CathPCI Registry. In a subgroup analysis using a linked Medicare data set, we assessed 30-day mortality. Median door-to-balloon times declined significantly, from 83 minutes in the 12 months from July 2005 through June 2006 to 67 minutes in the 12 months from July 2008 through June 2009 (P<0.001). Similarly, the percentage of patients for whom the door-to-balloon time was 90 minutes or less increased from 59.7% in the first year to 83.1% in the last year (P<0.001). Despite improvements in door-to-balloon times, there was no significant overall change in unadjusted in-hospital mortality (4.8% in 2005-2006 and 4.7% in 2008-2009, P=0.43 for trend) or in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (5.0% in 2005-2006 and 4.7% in 2008-2009, P=0.34), nor was a significant difference observed in unadjusted 30-day mortality (P=0.64). Although national door-to-balloon times have improved significantly for patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, in-hospital mortality has remained virtually unchanged. These data suggest that additional strategies are needed to reduce in-hospital mortality in this population. (Funded by the National Cardiovascular Data Registry of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog.

            The role of microvascular damage in the genesis of the "no-reflow" phenomenon was investigated in the left ventricular myocardium of dogs subjected to temporary occlusions of a major coronary artery for 40 and 90 min. Intravenous carbon black or thioflavin S (a fluorescent vital stain for endothelium) were used to demonstrate the distribution of coronary arterial flow in control and damaged myocardium. These tracers were injected simultaneously with release of the coronary occlusion or after 5 or 20 min of reflow of coronary arterial blood. After 40 min of ischemia plus arterial reperfusion, usually the tracers were evenly distributed throughout the damaged tissue at each time of reperfusion. On the other hand, when reflow was allowed after 90 min of ischemia, portions of the inner half of damaged myocardium were not penetrated by the tracers. Electron microscopic study of this poorly perfused tissue revealed severe capillary damage; endothelial cells with large intraluminal protrusions and decreased pinocytic vesicles were common. Also, occasional intraluminal fibrin thrombi were noted, as well as extravascular fibrin deposits and erythrocytes. Myocardial cells were swollen in both poorly perfused and well-perfused irreversibly injured tissue. Contraction bands and mitochondrial Ca(2+) accumulation were prominent features of irreversible injury with reflow at 40 min but were not noted after 90 min of ischemia in areas with poor perfusion. These results suggest that 40 min of ischemia were tolerated by the capillary bed of the dog heart without serious capillary damage or perfusion defects, but that 90 min of ischemic injury was associated with the "no-reflow" phenomenon, i.e., failure to achieve uniform reperfusion. This failure of reflow was associated with extensive capillary damage and myocardial cell swelling. Death of severely ischemic myocardial cells in this model occurs before the onset of capillary damage and the no-reflow phenomenon.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Expression of functional tissue factor by neutrophil extracellular traps in culprit artery of acute myocardial infarction

              Neutrophils are involved in the pathophysiology of infracted coronary arteries in STEMI via NET structures. Platelets, activated by thrombin, are required for NET formation, while the integrity of NET scaffold contributes to the functionality of NET-bound TF. The blockage of NET formation or local neutralization of NET-mediated TF signalling constitutes candidate therapeutic targets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation Research
                Circ Res
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0009-7330
                1524-4571
                July 05 2019
                July 05 2019
                : 125
                : 2
                : 245-258
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (G.N., R.A.M., F.C.)
                [2 ]Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy (G.N., F.C.)
                [3 ]Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC), Madrid, Spain (B.I.)
                [4 ]Cardiology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain(B.I.)
                [5 ]CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain (B.I.)
                [6 ]Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (H.T.)
                [7 ]Institute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Essen Medical School, Germany (G.H.)
                [8 ]The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, United Kingdom (H.B., D.J.H.)
                [9 ]Cardiovascular &amp; Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School (D.J.H.)
                [10 ]National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre (D.J.H.)
                [11 ]Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore (D.J.H.)
                [12 ]The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, United Kingdom (D.J.H.)
                [13 ]West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, United Kingdom (C.B.)
                [14 ]British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (C.B.)
                [15 ]University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine) and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany (T.S., I.E.)
                [16 ]Vita-Salute University and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy (P.G.C.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315344
                31268854
                fd8e0342-26f0-4c65-ab55-c4bf63169524
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article