37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The dynamics of injunctive social norms

      research-article
      * ,
      Evolutionary Human Sciences
      Cambridge University Press
      social norms, cooperation, punishment, decision-making, values

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          Injunctive social norms are behaviours that one is expected to follow and expects others to follow in a given social situation; they are maintained by the threat of disapproval or punishment and by the process of internalization. Injunctive norms govern all aspects of our social life but the understanding of their effects on individual and group behaviour is currently rather incomplete. Here I develop a general mathematical approach describing the dynamics of injunctive norms in heterogeneous groups. My approach captures various costs and benefits, both material and normative, associated with norm-related behaviours including punishment and disapproval by others. It also allows for errors in decision-making and explicitly accounts for differences between individuals in their values, beliefs about the population state, and sensitivity to the actions of others. In addition, it enables one to study the consequences of mixing populations with different normative values and the effects of persuasive interventions. I describe how interactions of these factors affect individual and group behaviour. As an illustration, I consider policies developed by practitioners to abolish the norms of footbinding and female genital cutting, to decrease college students’ drinking, and to increase pro-environmental behaviours. The theory developed here can be used for achieving a better understanding of historical and current social processes as well as for developing practical policies better accounting for human social behaviour.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Threshold Models of Collective Behavior

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Social influence: compliance and conformity.

            This review covers recent developments in the social influence literature, focusing primarily on compliance and conformity research published between 1997 and 2002. The principles and processes underlying a target's susceptibility to outside influences are considered in light of three goals fundamental to rewarding human functioning. Specifically, targets are motivated to form accurate perceptions of reality and react accordingly, to develop and preserve meaningful social relationships, and to maintain a favorable self-concept. Consistent with the current movement in compliance and conformity research, this review emphasizes the ways in which these goals interact with external forces to engender social influence processes that are subtle, indirect, and outside of awareness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.

              With data from 33 nations, we illustrate the differences between cultures that are tight (have many strong norms and a low tolerance of deviant behavior) versus loose (have weak social norms and a high tolerance of deviant behavior). Tightness-looseness is part of a complex, loosely integrated multilevel system that comprises distal ecological and historical threats (e.g., high population density, resource scarcity, a history of territorial conflict, and disease and environmental threats), broad versus narrow socialization in societal institutions (e.g., autocracy, media regulations), the strength of everyday recurring situations, and micro-level psychological affordances (e.g., prevention self-guides, high regulatory strength, need for structure). This research advances knowledge that can foster cross-cultural understanding in a world of increasing global interdependence and has implications for modeling cultural change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Evol Hum Sci
                Evol Hum Sci
                EHS
                Evolutionary Human Sciences
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2513-843X
                2020
                13 November 2020
                : 2
                : e60
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. E-mail: gavrila@ 123456utk.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1581-4018
                Article
                S2513843X20000584
                10.1017/ehs.2020.58
                10427483
                37588350
                fd443867-32a4-4296-ba88-0d127a8d2e50
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 4, References: 95, Pages: 20
                Categories
                Research Article

                social norms,cooperation,punishment,decision-making,values
                social norms, cooperation, punishment, decision-making, values

                Comments

                Comment on this article