32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Total Elbow Arthroplasty in the United States: Evaluation of Cost, Patient Demographics, and Complication Rates

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is utilized in the treatment of rheumatoid and post-traumatic elbow arthritis. TEA is a relatively low volume surgery in comparison to other types of arthroplasty and therefore little is known about current surgical utilization, patient demographics and complication rates in the United States. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the current practice trends and associated in-patient complications of TEA at academic centers in the United States. We queried the University Health Systems Consortium administrative database from 2007 to 2011 for patients who underwent an elective TEA. A descriptive analysis of demographics was performed which included patient age, sex, race, and insurance status. We also evaluated the following patient clinical benchmarks: hospital length of stay (LOS), hospital direct cost, in-hospital mortality, complications, and 30-day readmission rates. Our cohort consisted of 3146 adult patients (36.5% male and 63.5% female) with an average age of 58 years who underwent a total elbow arthroplasty (159 academic medical centers) in the United States. The racial demographics included 2334 (74%) Caucasian, 285 (9%) black, 236 (7.5%) Hispanic, 16 (0.5%) Asian, and 283 (9%) other patients. The mean LOS was 4.2±5 days and the mean total direct cost for the hospital was 16,300±4000 US Dollars per case. The overall inpatient complication rate was 3.1% and included mortality <1%, DVT (0.8%), re-operation (0.5%), and infection (0.4%). The 30-day readmission rate was 4.4%. TEA is a relatively uncommon surgery in comparison to other forms of arthroplasty but is associated with low in-patient and 30-day perioperative complication rate. Additionally, the 30-day readmission rate and overall hospital costs are comparable to the traditional total hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015.

          This study examined national trends and projections of procedure volumes and prevalence rates for shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States (U.S.). This study hypothesized that the growth in demand for upper extremity arthroplasty will be greater than the growth in demand for hip and knee arthroplasty and that demand for these procedures will continue to grow in the immediate future. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1993-2007) was used with U.S. Census data to quantify primary arthroplasty rates as a function of age, race, census region, and gender. Poisson regression was used to evaluate procedure rates and determine year-to-year trends in primary and revision arthroplasty. Projections were derived based on historical procedure rates combined with population projections from 2008 to 2015. Procedure volumes and rates increased at annual rates of 6% to 13% from 1993 to 2007. Compared with 2007 levels, projected procedures were predicted to further increase by between 192% and 322% by 2015. The revision burden increased from approximately 4.5% to 7%. During the period studied, the hospital length of stay decreased by approximately 2 days for total and hemishoulder procedures. Charges, in 2007 Consumer Price Index-adjusted dollars, increased for all 4 procedural types at annual rates of $900 to $1700. The growth rates of upper extremity arthroplasty were comparable to or higher than rates for total hip and knee procedures. Of particular concern was the increased revision burden. The rising number of arthroplasty procedures combined with increased charges has the potential to place a financial strain on the health care system. Copyright © 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction--internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

            We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates in elderly patients with displaced intra-articular, distal humeral fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or primary semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Forty-two patients were randomized by sealed envelope. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 65 years; displaced, comminuted, intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 13C); and closed or Gustilo grade I open fractures treated within 12 hours of injury. Both ORIF and TEA were performed following a standardized protocol. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were determined at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years. Complication type, duration, management, and treatment requiring reoperation were recorded. An intention-to-treat analysis and an on-treatment analysis were conducted to address patients randomized to ORIF but converted to TEA intraoperatively. Twenty-one patients were randomized to each treatment group. Two died before follow-up and were excluded from the study. Five patients randomized to ORIF were converted to TEA intraoperatively because of extensive comminution and inability to obtain fixation stable enough to allow early range of motion. This resulted in 15 patients (3 men and 12 women) with a mean age of 77 years in the ORIF group and 25 patients (2 men and 23 women) with a mean age of 78 years in the TEA group. Baseline demographics for mechanism, classification, comorbidities, fracture type, activity level, and ipsilateral injuries were similar between the 2 groups. Operative time averaged 32 minutes less in the TEA group (P = .001). Patients who underwent TEA had significantly better MEPSs at 3 months (83 vs 65, P = .01), 6 months (86 vs 68, P = .003), 12 months (88 vs 72, P = .007), and 2 years (86 vs 73, P = .015) compared with the ORIF group. Patients who underwent TEA had significantly better DASH scores at 6 weeks (43 vs 77, P = .02) and 6 months (31 vs 50, P = .01) but not at 12 months (32 vs 47, P = .1) or 2 years (34 vs 38, P = .6). The mean flexion-extension arc was 107 degrees (range, 42 degrees -145 degrees) in the TEA group and 95 degrees (range, 30 degrees -140 degrees) in the ORIF group (P = .19). Reoperation rates for TEA (3/25 [12%]) and ORIF (4/15 [27%]) were not statistically different (P = .2). TEA for the treatment of comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures resulted in more predictable and improved 2-year functional outcomes compared with ORIF, based on the MEPS. DASH scores were better in the TEA group in the short term but were not statistically different at 2 years' follow-up. TEA may result in decreased reoperation rates, considering that 25% of fractures randomized to ORIF were not amenable to internal fixation. TEA is a preferred alternative for ORIF in elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures that are not amenable to stable fixation. Elderly patients have an increased baseline DASH score and appear to accommodate to objective limitations in function with time.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow.

              Fifty-four patients in whom a total of fifty-eight semiconstrained modified Coonrad elbow implants had been inserted for rheumatoid arthritis were followed for a mean of 3.8 years (range, two to eight years). At the latest follow-up, there was little or no pain in fifty-three elbows (91 per cent). The arc of motion was from an average point in flexion of 20 degrees to an average point in flexion of 129 degrees, representing an average increase of 12 degrees of extension and 11 degrees of flexion. The average arc of pronation was 78 degrees, an increase of 14 degrees, and the average arc of supination was 77 degrees, an increase of 18 degrees. An additional ten patients who had had insertion of ten modified Coonrad implants during the same period were followed for less than two years but were included in the assessment of complications. Fifteen (22 per cent) of the sixty-eight elbows had a complication: four, infection; eight, acute or delayed condylar or ulnar fracture; and one each, ulnar neuritis, avulsion of the triceps, and fracture of the implant. Radiographic evaluation was performed for fifty-four of the fifty-eight elbows; the other four were excluded from this evaluation because of infection. A satisfactory radiographic appearance of the cement--its extent and the absence of skip areas--was noted for all of the ulnar components and for fifty-one (94 per cent) of the humeral components. No patient had radiographic evidence of a loose implant. A reoperation was performed in six elbows (10 per cent of the fifty-eight; 9 per cent of the sixty-eight): four were done for infection; one, for insufficiency of the triceps; and one, for a fractured ulnar component. Of the fifty-eight elbows, forty (69 per cent) had an excellent result; thirteen (22 per cent), a good result; four (7 per cent), a fair result; and one, a poor result.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orthop Rev (Pavia)
                Orthop Rev (Pavia)
                OR
                Orthopedic Reviews
                PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
                2035-8237
                2035-8164
                31 March 2016
                21 March 2016
                : 8
                : 1
                : 6113
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center , Worcester, MA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, MA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery , New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                Boston University School of Medicine - Boston Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 850 Harrison Avenue - Dowling 2 North, Boston, MA 02118, USA. xinning.li@ 123456gmail.com

                Contributions: the authors contributed equally.

                Conflict of interest: the authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

                Article
                10.4081/or.2016.6113
                4821224
                27114806
                fce462bb-d34b-4a60-a0df-7d8d9e88d980
                ©Copyright H. Zhou et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 July 2015
                : 13 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 25, Pages: 4
                Categories
                Article

                Orthopedics
                total elbow arthroplasty,united states,in-patient trend,complications,insurance,readmission

                Comments

                Comment on this article