Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians’ practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

          Methods

          An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists.

          Results

          The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76–95%), preoperative (50–94%), and intraoperative (55–90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated.

          Conclusions

          Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review.

          Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a paradigm shift in perioperative care, resulting in substantial improvements in clinical outcomes and cost savings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018

            This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Pleura Peritoneum
                Pleura Peritoneum
                pp
                pp
                pp
                Pleura and Peritoneum
                De Gruyter
                2364-7671
                2364-768X
                21 June 2021
                September 2021
                : 6
                : 3
                : 99-111
                Affiliations
                deptDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology , universityCommand Hospital , Pune, India
                deptDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain , universityTata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute , Mumbai, India
                deptDepartment of Critical Care Medicine , universityZydus Hospital , Ahmedabad, India
                deptDepartment of Anaesthesiology , universityCancer Institute (WIA) , Chennai, India
                deptDepartment of Anaesthesiology , universityApollo Hospital , Chennai, India
                deptDepartment of Anaesthesiology , universitySaifee Hospital , Mumbai, India
                universityBhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) Hospital , Mumbai, India
                deptDepartment of Anaesthesiology , universityJehangir Hospital , Pune, India
                deptDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology , universityTata Medical Centre , Kolkata, India
                deptDepartment of Surgical Oncology , universityApollo Hospital , Chennai, India
                deptDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology , universityChristian Medical College , Vellore, India
                deptDepartment of Anaesthesiology , universityKumaran Hospital , Chennai, India
                deptDepartment of Surgical Oncology , universityJehangir Hospital , Pune, India
                deptDepartment of Surgical Oncology , universityTata Medical Centre , Kolkata, India
                deptDepartment of Surgical Oncology , universityCancer Institute (WIA) , Chennai, India
                deptDepartment of Surgical Oncology , universityZydus Hospital , Ahmedabad, India
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Geetu Bhandoria, MS, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal 700027, India, Phone: +91 9913109759, E-mail: bhandoriageetu@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-7856
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4313-7659
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3663-848X
                Article
                pp-2021-0117
                10.1515/pp-2021-0117
                8482448
                34676283
                fc828669-44b4-49de-aa3f-e691e92fd11f
                © 2021 Geetu Bhandoria et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

                This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 02 March 2021
                : 12 May 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 02, Tables: 04, References: 39, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Research Article

                cytoreductive surgery,enhanced recovery after surgery (eras),hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec),perioperative management,peritoneal metastases

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content666

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors619