29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urolithiasis is a common disease with increasing prevalence worldwide and a lifetime-estimated recurrence risk of over 50%. Imaging plays a critical role in the initial diagnosis, follow-up and urological management of urinary tract stone disease. Unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) is highly sensitive (>95%) and specific (>96%) in the diagnosis of urolithiasis and is the imaging investigation of choice for the initial assessment of patients with suspected urolithiasis. The emergence of multi-detector CT (MDCT) and technological innovations in CT such as dual-energy CT (DECT) has widened the scope of MDCT in the stone disease management from initial diagnosis to encompass treatment planning and monitoring of treatment success. DECT has been shown to enhance pre-treatment characterization of stone composition in comparison with conventional MDCT and is being increasingly used. Although CT-related radiation dose exposure remains a valid concern, the use of low-dose MDCT protocols and integration of newer iterative reconstruction algorithms into routine CT practice has resulted in a substantial decrease in ionizing radiation exposure. In this review article, our intent is to discuss the role of MDCT in the diagnosis and post-treatment evaluation of urolithiasis and review the impact of emerging CT technologies such as dual energy in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

            Prior studies using radiography have examined the relationship of ureteral stone size and location to the probability of spontaneous passage. Given the improved accuracy and new role of unenhanced CT in the diagnosis of acute ureterolithiasis, we studied the relationship of stone size and location as determined by unenhanced CT to the rate of spontaneous passage. Over a 29-month period, 850 patients with acute flank pain were evaluated with unenhanced CT. Confirmation of the CT diagnosis was obtained retrospectively for 172 patients with ureteral stones: 115 stones passed spontaneously and 57 required intervention. Stone size was defined as the maximum diameter within the plane of the axial CT section. Stone location was classified as proximal ureter (above the sacroiliac joints), mid ureter (overlying the sacroiliac joints), distal ureter (below the sacroiliac joints), and ureterovesical junction. The spontaneous passage rate for stones 1 mm in diameter was 87%; for stones 2-4 mm, 76%; for stones 5-7 mm, 60%; for stones 7-9 mm, 48%; and for stones larger than 9 mm, 25%. Spontaneous passage rate as a function of stone location was 48% for stones in the proximal ureter, 60% for mid ureteral stones, 75% for distal stones, and 79% for ureterovesical junction stones. The rate of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones does vary with stone size and location as determined by CT. These rates are similar to those previously published based on radiography.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Urol
                Indian J Urol
                IJU
                Indian Journal of Urology : IJU : Journal of the Urological Society of India
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0970-1591
                1998-3824
                Jul-Sep 2015
                : 31
                : 3
                : 185-193
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes
                For Correspondence: Dr. Avinash Kambadakone-Ramesh, Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA-02114, USA. E-mail: akambadakone@ 123456mgh.harvard.edu
                Article
                IJU-31-185
                10.4103/0970-1591.156924
                4495492
                26166961
                fc72d514-e28b-466c-af86-a3e17f04cb3d
                Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Review Article

                Urology
                advances,computed tomography,urolithiasis
                Urology
                advances, computed tomography, urolithiasis

                Comments

                Comment on this article