21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Tumor Immunity and Survival as a Function of Alternative Neopeptides in Human Cancer

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">The immune system exerts antitumor activity via T cell–dependent recognition of tumor-specific antigens. Although the number of tumor neopeptides—peptides derived from somatic mutations—often correlates with immune activity and survival, most classically defined high-affinity neopeptides (CDNs) are not immunogenic, and only rare CDNs have been linked to tumor rejection. Thus, the rules of tumor antigen recognition remain incompletely understood. Here, we analyzed neopeptides, immune activity, and clinical outcome from 6,324 patients across 27 tumor types. We characterized a class of “alternatively defined neopeptides” (ADNs), which are mutant peptides predicted to bind MHC (class I or II) with improved affinity relative to their nonmutated counterpart. ADNs are abundant and molecularly distinct from CDNs. The load of ADNs correlated with intratumoral T-cell responses and immune suppression, and ADNs were also strong predictors of patient survival across tumor types. These results expand the spectrum of mutation-derived tumor antigens with potential clinical relevance. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Cancer Immunology Research
          Cancer Immunol Res
          American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
          2326-6066
          2326-6074
          February 28 2018
          March 2018
          March 2018
          January 16 2018
          : 6
          : 3
          : 276-287
          Article
          10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0559
          6047936
          29339376
          fc5edd2f-5ad7-4aa1-a079-ef3bf5106852
          © 2018
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article