15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontic micro-implants (n = 44; 14 women, 8 men). Methods: PBM with 808 nm diode laser was applied immediately, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 30 days post the implantation. Results were assessed within same time frames and additionally after 60 days to check for implants stability using the Periotest device. Patients pain experiences following the first day post-treatment and potential loss of micro-implants after 60 days were recorded. The procedure involved insertion of mini-implants in the maxilla for the laser group (L, n = 22) and negative control group (C, n = 22). Irradiation was carried buccally and palatally with respect to the maxillary ridge (2 points). The energy per point was 4 J (8 J/cm 2), total dose was 56 J. Results: Patients did not report significant differences in terms of pain experiences comparing the L and C groups ( p = 0.499). At 30 days post-treatment, higher secondary stability of implants was observed in the laser group (Periotest Test Value, PTV 6.32 ± 3.62), in contrast to the controls (PTV 11.34 ± 5.76) ( p = 0.004). At 60 days post-treatment, significantly higher stability was recorded in the laser group (PTV 6.55 ± 4.66) compared with the controls, PTV (10.95 ± 4.77) ( p = 0.009). Conclusions: Application of the 808 nm diode laser increased secondary micro-implant stability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Low-level laser therapy: a useful technique for enhancing the proliferation of various cultured cells.

          The aim of this work is to review the available literature on the details of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) use for the enhancement of the proliferation of various cultured cell lines including stem cells. A cell culture is one of the most useful techniques in science, particularly in the production of viral vaccines and hybrid cell lines. However, the growth rate of some of the much-needed mammalian cells is slow. LLLT can enhance the proliferation rate of various cell lines. Literature review from 1923 to 2010. By investigating the outcome of LLLT on cell cultures, many articles report that it produces higher rates of ATP, RNA, and DNA synthesis in stem cells and other cell lines. Thus, LLLT improves the proliferation of the cells without causing any cytotoxic effects. Mainly, helium neon and gallium-aluminum-arsenide (Ga-Al-As) lasers are used for LLLT on cultured cells. The results of LLLT also vary according to the applied energy density and wavelengths to which the target cells are subjected. This review suggests that an energy density value of 0.5 to 4.0 J/cm(2) and a visible spectrum ranging from 600 to 700 nm of LLLT are very helpful in enhancing the proliferation rate of various cell lines. With the appropriate use of LLLT, the proliferation rate of cultured cells, including stem cells, can be increased, which would be very useful in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage.

            The purposes of this study were to examine the success rates and find factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Eighty-seven consecutive patients (35 male, 52 female; mean age, 15.5 years) with a total of 227 screw implants of 4 types were examined. Success rates during a 15-month period of force application were determined according to 18 clinical variables. The overall success rate was 91.6%. The clinical variables of screw-implant factors (type, diameter, and length), local host factors (occlusogingival positioning), and management factors (angle of placement, onset and method of force application, ligature wire extension, exposure of screw head, and oral hygiene) did not show any statistical differences in success rates. General host factors (age, sex) had no statistical significance. Mobility, jaw (maxilla or mandible), and side of placement (right or left), and inflammation showed significant differences in success rates. Mobility, the right side of the jaw, and the mandible were the relative risk factors in the logistic regression analysis when excluding mobility, inflammation around the screw implants was added to the risk factors. To minimize the failure of screw implants, inflammation around the implant must be controlled, especially for screws placed in the right side of the mandible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Materials (Basel)
                Materials (Basel)
                materials
                Materials
                MDPI
                1996-1944
                14 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 13
                : 10
                : 2265
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laser Laboratory at Dental Surgery Department, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wrocław, Poland; kgl@ 123456periocare.pl
                [2 ]Private Dental Practice, 64-000 Kościan, Poland; gabinet6@ 123456op.pl
                [3 ]Dental Surgery Department, Medical University of Wroclaw, 50-425 Wrocław, Poland; tomgedrange@ 123456gmail.com (T.G.); marzena.dominiak@ 123456wp.pl (M.D.)
                [4 ]Department of Orthodontics, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Anatomy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland; krzysztof.janowicz.16@ 123456abdn.ac.uk (K.J.); bkempisty@ 123456ump.edu.pl (B.K.)
                [6 ]Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznań, Poland
                [7 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital and Masaryk University, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
                [8 ]Department of Veterinary Surgery, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: jacek.matys@ 123456wp.pl ; Tel.: +48-791-511-789
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3801-0218
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5700-4577
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-0549
                Article
                materials-13-02265
                10.3390/ma13102265
                7287787
                32423127
                fc423076-eef2-4d26-ac18-df9e6d266a8a
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 April 2020
                : 11 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                laser biostimulation,low level laser therapy,mini-implant therapy,pbm,ptv

                Comments

                Comment on this article