Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How may ChatGPT impact medical teaching?

      editorial
      1 , * , 1
      Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
      Associação Médica Brasileira

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          On November 22, 2022, ChatGPT, a chatbot created by OpenAI, a branch of Microsoft nowadays, was released to the public. Besides the lack of mediatic attention, that date is already marked in history. ChatGPT is an AI-powered computer program that can understand and generate human-like language 1 . It has been trained on vast amounts of text to analyze language patterns, allowing it to provide accurate responses to a wide range of questions. So, why the buzz 2 ? DropBox took 7 months to reach 1 million users, Spotify took 5 months, and Instagram took 2.5 months. ChatGPT reached the mark of 1 million users in only 5 days after release. The tool is so powerful that its application possibilities seem to be limitless. ChatGPT has already been proven to be an excellent doctor, in a sense. It was able to pass the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), at least the multiple choice questions 3 . But how can we use it for the benefit of medical education? When we asked ChatGPT that same question, here are some answers: Medical Q&A, virtual patient simulations, language translation, personalized learning, continuing medical education, and remote learning. When we asked about the dangers of using ChatGPT in medical education, some answers were as follows: inaccurate information, overreliance on technology, privacy concerns, bias, lack of Personalization, Limited Interactivity, etc. We agree with the presented potential benefits, partially. First, the ChatGPT database (until this letter is written) is upper-limited to 2021. So the “up-to-date information” is compromised. The GPT-3 model (used by ChatGPT) is not meant to be re-trained with specific datasets (as presented by the developers in the paper “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners,” 2020), so the “training in large medical databases and clinical guidelines” is also compromised. While talking about the dangers, the authors also agree with ChatGPT. The risk of inaccurate information may be one of the most important, but it is also one of the most evident and easily correctable. Nevertheless, some other issues must be taken into consideration: To obtain the six items on the list of benefits, we had to regenerate the response three times. Only inaccurate information and privacy concerns were present in all three responses. That is a problem in learning: we must have consistency in the information. Otherwise, it will be very difficult to transform it into knowledge. Ethical behavior is key in medical practice and must be developed throughout the formation. Although ChatGPT has mechanisms to prevent “morally unacceptable answers,” the specificity of medical ethics has not been fully assessed. The developers addressed the issue in the cited paper. This text was written with the aid of ChaGPT, and another AI performed grammar and orthographic revision. One thing is for sure, ChatGPT is the first of many to come, and we will have to learn to work with it, not against it.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models

          We evaluated the performance of a large language model called ChatGPT on the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE), which consists of three exams: Step 1, Step 2CK, and Step 3. ChatGPT performed at or near the passing threshold for all three exams without any specialized training or reinforcement. Additionally, ChatGPT demonstrated a high level of concordance and insight in its explanations. These results suggest that large language models may have the potential to assist with medical education, and potentially, clinical decision-making.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ChatGPT is fun, but not an author

            In less than 2 months, the artificial intelligence (AI) program ChatGPT has become a cultural sensation. It is freely accessible through a web portal created by the tool’s developer, OpenAI. The program—which automatically creates text based on written prompts—is so popular that it’s likely to be “at capacity right now” if you attempt to use it. When you do get through, ChatGPT provides endless entertainment. I asked it to rewrite the first scene of the classic American play Death of a Salesman , but to feature Princess Elsa from the animated movie Frozen as the main character instead of Willy Loman. The output was an amusing conversation in which Elsa—who has come home from a tough day of selling—is told by her son Happy, “Come on, Mom. You’re Elsa from Frozen . You have ice powers and you’re a queen. You’re unstoppable.” Mash-ups like this are certainly fun, but there are serious implications for generative AI programs like ChatGPT in science and academia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use

              AJ Nature (2023)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
                Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
                ramb
                Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
                Associação Médica Brasileira
                0104-4230
                1806-9282
                15 May 2023
                2023
                : 69
                : 4
                : e20230282
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculdade de Medicina de Itajubá – Itajubá (MG), Brazil.
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: gerson.junior@ 123456fmit.edu.br

                Conflicts of interest: the authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-5743
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-8488
                Article
                00100
                10.1590/1806-9282.20230282
                10185047
                37194805
                fc115642-8896-4b46-90e0-9c9c8a986678

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 March 2023
                : 16 March 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 3
                Categories
                Editorial

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content3,482

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors37