3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of market-incentive environmental regulation policies on corporate environmental costs: Evidence from China’s carbon trading policy

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , * , , 1
      PLOS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As the world’s largest emitter of carbon, China has implemented a series of environmental regulatory policies to reduce emissions. However, most of these environmental regulations have been at the expense of increased corporate environmental costs. Therefore, research on how to efficiently control these costs is of significant practical importance. This paper uses the China’s carbon trading policy (CTP) implemented in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment, utilizing data from Chinese listed manufacturing firms between 2008 and 2020. Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model, the study investigates the impact of market-incentive environmental regulatory policies (ERP) on environmental costs. The findings reveal that CTP significantly reduced the environmental costs of firms, confirming the positive and vital role market-incentive ERP can play in environmental protection and cost control. These conclusions remain robust after a series of stability tests. Mechanism analysis suggests that the cost reductions brought by market-incentive ERP are primarily achieved through increasing green innovation. Heterogeneity analysis shows that non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs), key polluting firms, firms with lower financial constraints, and firms with lower total production efficiency benefit more from market-incentive environmental regulatory policies. This study provides new empirical evidence for government policy-making aimed at achieving long-term sustainable development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Conceptualization
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                9 February 2024
                2024
                : 19
                : 2
                : e0297003
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute of Western China Economic Research, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China
                [2 ] Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China
                [3 ] Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
                Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1390-5703
                Article
                PONE-D-23-26038
                10.1371/journal.pone.0297003
                10857742
                38335212
                fbd0b358-8753-4f0f-8c6b-af1abb0e996c
                © 2024 Qin et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 August 2023
                : 22 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012476, Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University;
                Award ID: JBK2307090
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012456, National Social Science Fund of China;
                Award ID: 71873107
                the study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JBK2307090) and the National Social Science Fund of China (71873107). The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JBK2307090) funder, Chao Tu, played a significant role in this study. Specifically, Chao Tu contributed to the Data curation, Investigation, Software, Validation, and Writing – original draft of the manuscript. The National Social Science Fund of China (71873107) funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript, but provided financial support.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Environmental Protection
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Environmental Protection
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Environmental Economics
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Environmental Economics
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Pollution
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Social Sciences
                Law and Legal Sciences
                Environmental Law
                Environmental Regulations
                Social Sciences
                Law and Legal Sciences
                Regulations
                Environmental Regulations
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Economics
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Economics
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Ecological Economics
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Economic Analysis
                Economic Impact Analysis
                Custom metadata
                Data cannot be shared publicly because of the China Stock Market &Accounting Research (CSMAR) Data are available for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Researchers may purchase access to the database and login to the website at http://www.gtarsc.com/ to obtain the data.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article