40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Current Status of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Controversies, Unresolved Issues and Some Promising Solutions to Improve Their Therapeutic Efficacy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) currently constitute the most frequently used cell type in advanced therapies with different purposes, most of which are related with inflammatory processes. Although the therapeutic efficacy of these cells has been clearly demonstrated in different disease animal models and in numerous human phase I/II clinical trials, only very few phase III trials using MSCs have demonstrated the expected potential therapeutic benefit. On the other hand, diverse controversial issues on the biology and clinical applications of MSCs, including their specific phenotype, the requirement of an inflammatory environment to induce immunosuppression, the relevance of the cell dose and their administration schedule, the cell delivery route (intravascular/systemic vs. local cell delivery), and the selected cell product (i.e., use of autologous vs. allogeneic MSCs, freshly cultured vs. frozen and thawed MSCs, MSCs vs. MSC-derived extracellular vesicles, etc.) persist. In the current review article, we have addressed these issues with special emphasis in the new approaches to improve the properties and functional capabilities of MSCs after distinct cell bioengineering strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references217

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells.

          Human mesenchymal stem cells are thought to be multipotent cells, which are present in adult marrow, that can replicate as undifferentiated cells and that have the potential to differentiate to lineages of mesenchymal tissues, including bone, cartilage, fat, tendon, muscle, and marrow stroma. Cells that have the characteristics of human mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from marrow aspirates of volunteer donors. These cells displayed a stable phenotype and remained as a monolayer in vitro. These adult stem cells could be induced to differentiate exclusively into the adipocytic, chondrocytic, or osteocytic lineages. Individual stem cells were identified that, when expanded to colonies, retained their multilineage potential.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Clinical Challenges and Therapeutic Opportunities

            Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been the subject of clinical trials for more than a generation, and the outcomes of advanced clinical trials have fallen short of expectations raised by encouraging pre-clinical animal data in a wide array of disease models. In this Perspective, important biological and pharmacological disparities in pre-clinical research and human translational studies are highlighted, and analyses of clinical trial failures and recent successes provide a rational pathway to MSC regulatory approval and deployment for disorders with unmet medical needs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Three-Dimensional in Vitro Cell Culture Models in Drug Discovery and Drug Repositioning

              Drug development is a lengthy and costly process that proceeds through several stages from target identification to lead discovery and optimization, preclinical validation and clinical trials culminating in approval for clinical use. An important step in this process is high-throughput screening (HTS) of small compound libraries for lead identification. Currently, the majority of cell-based HTS is being carried out on cultured cells propagated in two-dimensions (2D) on plastic surfaces optimized for tissue culture. At the same time, compelling evidence suggests that cells cultured in these non-physiological conditions are not representative of cells residing in the complex microenvironment of a tissue. This discrepancy is thought to be a significant contributor to the high failure rate in drug discovery, where only a low percentage of drugs investigated ever make it through the gamut of testing and approval to the market. Thus, three-dimensional (3D) cell culture technologies that more closely resemble in vivo cell environments are now being pursued with intensity as they are expected to accommodate better precision in drug discovery. Here we will review common approaches to 3D culture, discuss the significance of 3D cultures in drug resistance and drug repositioning and address some of the challenges of applying 3D cell cultures to high-throughput drug discovery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cell Dev Biol
                Front Cell Dev Biol
                Front. Cell Dev. Biol.
                Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-634X
                16 March 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 650664
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Hematopoietic Transplant and Cellular Therapy Unit, Medicine Department, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria Virgen de la Arrixaca, University of Murcia , Murcia, Spain
                [2] 2Spanish Network of Cell Therapy (TerCel), Instituto de Salud Carlos III , Madrid, Spain
                [3] 3Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM)) , Madrid, Spain
                [4] 4Advanced Therapies Mixed Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM)) , Madrid, Spain
                [5] 5Centre for Cytometry and Fluorescence Microscopy, Complutense University , Madrid, Spain
                [6] 6Hematopoietic Innovative Therapies Division, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras , Madrid, Spain
                [7] 7Department of Cell Biology, Complutense University , Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Joan Oliva, Emmaus Medical Inc., United States

                Reviewed by: Sina Naserian, Hôpital Paul Brousse, France; Selim Kuci, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany

                *Correspondence: Agustín G. Zapata, zapata@ 123456bio.ucm.es

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Stem Cell Research, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

                Article
                10.3389/fcell.2021.650664
                8007911
                33796536
                fb778b9d-cb1d-49b3-862d-1a6599424d74
                Copyright © 2021 García-Bernal, García-Arranz, Yáñez, Hervás-Salcedo, Cortés, Fernández-García, Hernando-Rodríguez, Quintana-Bustamante, Bueren, García-Olmo, Moraleda, Segovia and Zapata.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 January 2021
                : 26 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 217, Pages: 18, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades 10.13039/100014440
                Funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III 10.13039/501100004587
                Award ID: RD16/0011/0001
                Award ID: RD16/0011/0002
                Award ID: RD16/0011/0011
                Award ID: RD16/0011/0013
                Funded by: Comunidad de Madrid 10.13039/100012818
                Categories
                Cell and Developmental Biology
                Review

                msc bioengineering,msc homing,msc immunomodulation,msc preconditioning,msc therapeutic efficacy

                Comments

                Comment on this article