15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) predicts mortality in severe trauma patients with head injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The reverse shock index (rSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), is used to identify prognosis in trauma patients. Multiplying rSI by Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) can possibly predict better in-hospital mortality in patients with trauma. However, rSIG has never been used to evaluate the mortality risk in adult severe trauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 16) with head injury (head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≥ 2) in the emergency department (ED). This retrospective case control study recruited adult severe trauma patients (ISS ≥ 16) with head injury (head AIS ≥ 2) who presented to the ED of two major trauma centers between January 01, 2014 and May 31, 2017. Demographic data, vital signs, ISS scores, injury mechanisms, laboratory data, managements, and outcomes were included for the analysis. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to evaluate the accuracy of rSIG score in predicting in-hospital mortality. In total, 438 patients (mean age: 56.48 years; 68.5% were males) were included in this study. In-hospital mortality occurred in 24.7% patients. The median (interquartile range) ISS score was 20 (17–26). Patients with rSIG ≤ 14 had seven-fold increased risks of mortality than those without rSIG ≤ 14 (odds ratio: 7.64; 95% confidence interval: 4.69–12.42). Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and area under the curve values for rSIG score were 0.29 and 0.76, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of rSIG ≤ 14 were 0.71, 0.75, 0.49, and 0.89, respectively. The rSIG score is a prompt and simple tool to predict in-hospital mortality among adult severe trauma patients with head injury.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An overview of the injury severity score and the new injury severity score.

          The research was undertaken to describe the injury severity score (ISS) and the new injury severity score (NISS) and to illustrate their statistical properties. Descriptive analysis and assessment of the distribution of these scales. Three data sources--the National Pediatric Trauma Registry; the Massachusetts Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set; and a trauma registry from an urban level I trauma center in Massachusetts--were used to describe the distribution of the ISS and NISS among injured patients. The ISS/NISS was found to have a positively skewed distribution and transformation did not improve their skewness. The findings suggest that for statistical or analytical purposes the ISS/ NISS should not be considered a continuous variable, particularly if ISS/NISS is treated as a continuous variable for correlation with an outcome measure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients.

            Currently, specific triage criteria, such as blood pressure, respiratory status, Glasgow Coma Scale, and mechanism of injury are used to categorize trauma patients and prioritize emergency department (ED) and trauma team responses. It has been demonstrated in previous literature that an abnormal shock index (SI = heart rate [HR]/systolic blood pressure, >0.9) portends a worse outcome in critically ill patients. Our study looked to evaluate the SI calculated in the field, on arrival to the ED, and the change between field and ED values as a simple and early marker to predict mortality in traumatically injured patients. A retrospective chart review of the trauma registry of an urban level I trauma center. Analysis of 2,445 patients admitted over 5 years with records in the trauma registry of which 1,166 also had data for the field SI. An increase in SI from the field to the ED was defined as any increase in SI regardless of the level of the magnitude of change. Twenty-two percent of patients reviewed had an ED SI >0.9, with a mortality rate of 15.9% compared with 6.3% in patients with a normal ED SI. An increase in SI between the field and ED signaled a mortality rate of 9.3% versus 5.7% for patients with decreasing or unchanged SI. Patients with an increase in SI of >or=0.3 had a mortality rate of 27.6% versus 5.8% for patients with change in SI of 0.9 have higher mortality rates. An increase in SI from the field to the ED may predict higher mortality. The SI may be a valuable addition to other ED triage criteria currently used to activate trauma team responses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ["Shock index"].

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                chad_911@hotmail.com
                bybarian@gmail.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                7 February 2020
                7 February 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 2095
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Ton-Yen General Hospital, Hsinchu county, Zhubei City, Hsinchu county, Taiwan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0627 9786, GRID grid.413535.5, Department of Emergency Medicine, , Cathay General Hospital, ; Taipei, Taiwan
                [3 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, Taiwan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1063, GRID grid.256105.5, Fu Jen Catholic University School of Medicine, ; Taipei, Taiwan
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0572 9255, GRID grid.413876.f, Department of Emergency Medicine, , Chi-Mei Medical Center, ; Tainan, Taiwan
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0532 3255, GRID grid.64523.36, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, , College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, ; Tainan, Taiwan
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0532 2914, GRID grid.412717.6, Department of Senior Services, , Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, ; Tainan, Taiwan
                Article
                59044
                10.1038/s41598-020-59044-w
                7005840
                32034233
                fb5122eb-9fb9-4464-a875-75455648c43f
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 24 October 2019
                : 22 January 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002811, Cathay General Hospital (CGH);
                Award ID: Cathay General Hospital (CGH)
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award ID: CGH-MR-B10701
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Ton-Yen General Hospital, [Grant number TYH107001]
                Funded by: Ton-Yen General Hospital, [Grant number TYH107001] Cathay General Hospital, [Grant number CGH-MR-B10701]
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                risk factors,trauma
                Uncategorized
                risk factors, trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article