1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects of Synthetic Glucocorticoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Synthetic glucocorticoids are widely used to treat patients with a broad range of diseases. While efficacious, glucocorticoids can be accompanied by neuropsychiatric adverse effects.

          Objective

          This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses and quantifies the proportion of different neuropsychiatric adverse effects in patients using synthetic glucocorticoids.

          Methods

          Six electronic databases were searched to identify potentially relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies assessing psychiatric side effects of glucocorticoids measured with validated questionnaires were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and AXIS appraisal tool. For proportions of neuropsychiatric outcomes, we pooled proportions, and when possible, differences in questionnaire scores between glucocorticoid users and nonusers were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD). Data were pooled in a random-effects logistic regression model.

          Results

          We included 49 studies with heterogeneity in study populations, type, dose, and duration of glucocorticoids. For glucocorticoid users, meta-analysis showed a proportion of 22% for depression (95% CI, 14%-33%), 11% for mania (2%-46%), 8% for anxiety (2%-25%), 16% for delirium (6%-36%), and 52% for behavioral changes (42%-61%). Questionnaire scores for depression (SMD of 0.80 [95% CI 0.35-1.26]), and mania (0.78 [0.14-1.42]) were higher than in controls, indicating more depressive and manic symptoms following glucocorticoid use.

          Conclusion

          The heterogeneity of glucocorticoid use is reflected in the available studies. Despite this heterogeneity, the proportion of neuropsychiatric adverse effects in glucocorticoid users is high. The most substantial associations with glucocorticoid use were found for depression and mania. Upon starting glucocorticoid treatment, awareness of possible psychiatric side effects is essential. More structured studies on incidence and potential pathways of neuropsychiatric side effects of prescribed glucocorticoids are clearly needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

              Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Clin Endocrinol Metab
                J Clin Endocrinol Metab
                jcem
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                June 2024
                01 December 2023
                01 December 2023
                : 109
                : 6
                : e1442-e1451
                Affiliations
                Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center , Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center , Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center , Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC—University Medical Center Rotterdam , Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Psychiatry and Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUMC , De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Academic Working Place Depression, GGZ InGeest , Oldenaller 1, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Amsterdam Neuroscience (Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Stress & Sleep Program) and Amsterdam Public Health (Mental Health Program) Research Institutes , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam , Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Center and Haga Teaching Hospitals, Leiden and The Hague , The Netherlands
                Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam , Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism , Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center , Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center , Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Anne-Sophie C. A. M. Koning, MSc, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. Email: a.c.a.koning@ 123456lumc.nl .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-2576
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-4408
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-8113
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-0744
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0120-4913
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-921X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-9866
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-6859
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-7580
                Article
                dgad701
                10.1210/clinem/dgad701
                11099480
                38038629
                fb492f72-7e0d-4fd9-8582-aeb6a85d2d3e
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 August 2023
                : 27 November 2023
                : 15 December 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, DOI 10.13039/501100001826;
                Award ID: 95105005
                Categories
                Meta-Analysis
                AcademicSubjects/MED00250

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                neuropsychiatry,glucocorticoids,depression,anxiety,prednisone,dexamethasone
                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                neuropsychiatry, glucocorticoids, depression, anxiety, prednisone, dexamethasone

                Comments

                Comment on this article