28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effectiveness of the DECIDE Interventions on Shared Decision Making and Perceived Quality of Care in Behavioral Health With Multicultural Patients : A Randomized Clinical Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d1555920e619">This randomized clinical trial tests the effectiveness of patient and clinician interventions to improve shared decision making and quality of care among an ethnically/racially diverse sample from behavioral health clinics. </p><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e625">Question</h5> <p id="d1555920e627">How effective are the DECIDE (decide the problem; explore the questions; closed or open-ended questions; identify the who, why, or how of the problem; direct questions to your health care professional; enjoy a shared solution) patient and clinician interventions for improving shared decision making and quality of care for ethnic/racial minorities? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e630">Findings</h5> <p id="d1555920e632">In a randomized clinical trial of 312 dyads that included 74 behavioral health clinicians and 312 patients, the clinician intervention significantly improved shared decision making. Patients perceived higher quality of care when patients and clinicians received the recommended dosage of each intervention. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e635">Meaning</h5> <p id="d1555920e637">The clinician intervention could improve shared decision making with minority populations, and the patient intervention could improve patient-reported quality of care by incorporating patient preferences in health care. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e641">Importance</h5> <p id="d1555920e643">Few randomized clinical trials have been conducted with ethnic/racial minorities to improve shared decision making (SDM) and quality of care. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e646">Objective</h5> <p id="d1555920e648">To test the effectiveness of patient and clinician interventions to improve SDM and quality of care among an ethnically/racially diverse sample. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e651">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d1555920e653">This cross-level 2 × 2 randomized clinical trial included clinicians at level 2 and patients (nested within clinicians) at level 1 from 13 Massachusetts behavioral health clinics. Clinicians and patients were randomly selected at each site in a 1:1 ratio for each 2-person block. Clinicians were recruited starting September 1, 2013; patients, starting November 3, 2013. Final data were collected on September 30, 2016. Data were analyzed based on intention to treat. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e656">Interventions</h5> <p id="d1555920e658">The clinician intervention consisted of a workshop and as many as 6 coaching telephone calls to promote communication and therapeutic alliance to improve SDM. The 3-session patient intervention sought to improve SDM and quality of care. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e661">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d1555920e663">The SDM was assessed by a blinded coder based on clinical recordings, patient perception of SDM and quality of care, and clinician perception of SDM. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e666">Results</h5> <p id="d1555920e668">Of 312 randomized patients, 212 (67.9%) were female and 100 (32.1%) were male; mean (SD) age was 44.0 (15.0) years. Of 74 randomized clinicians, 56 (75.7%) were female and 18 (4.3%) were male; mean (SD) age was 39.8 (12.5) years. Patient-clinician pairs were assigned to 1 of the following 4 design arms: patient and clinician in the control condition (n = 72), patient in intervention and clinician in the control condition (n = 68), patient in the control condition and clinician in intervention (n = 83), or patient and clinician in intervention (n = 89). All pairs underwent analysis. The clinician intervention significantly increased SDM as rated by blinded coders using the 12-item Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making instrument ( <i>b</i> = 4.52; SE = 2.17; <i>P</i> = .04; Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.29) but not as assessed by clinician or patient. More clinician coaching sessions (dosage) were significantly associated with increased SDM as rated by blinded coders ( <i>b</i> = 12.01; SE = 3.72; <i>P</i> = .001; Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.78). The patient intervention significantly increased patient-perceived quality of care ( <i>b</i> = 2.27; SE = 1.16; <i>P</i> = .05; Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.19). There was a significant interaction between patient and clinician dosage ( <i>b</i> = 7.40; SE = 3.56; <i>P</i> = .04; Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.62), with the greatest benefit when both obtained the recommended dosage. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e709">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d1555920e711">The clinician intervention could improve SDM with minority populations, and the patient intervention could augment patient-reported quality of care. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-yoi170110-11"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1555920e714">Trial Registration</h5> <p id="d1555920e716">clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <a data-untrusted="" href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01947283" id="d1555920e718" target="xrefwindow">NCT01947283</a> </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA Psychiatry
          JAMA Psychiatry
          American Medical Association (AMA)
          2168-622X
          April 01 2018
          April 01 2018
          : 75
          : 4
          : 325
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
          [2 ]Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
          [3 ]Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
          [4 ]Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel
          [5 ]Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
          [6 ]Mental Health Innovation Laboratory, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, New York
          [7 ]Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts
          [8 ]Department of Psychology, University of Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut
          [9 ]Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts
          [10 ]Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois
          [11 ]Department of Sociology and Heath Sciences, Institute on Urban Health Research, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
          [12 ]Office of Urban Health Programs, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
          [13 ]Center for Community Health Education Research and Service, Inc, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
          [14 ]Psyche Skype, Greater Boston Area, Massachusetts
          [15 ]private practice, Brookline, Massachusetts
          [16 ]Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
          [17 ]Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
          [18 ]Behavioral Health Services, South End Community Health Center, Boston, Massachusetts
          [19 ]National Alliance on Mental Illness, Arlington, Virginia
          [20 ]Department of Psychology, New York University, New York City, New York
          Article
          10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4585
          5875387
          29466533
          fad6bfaf-f55a-4db0-9060-a8e6be83e2aa
          © 2018
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article