2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Minimal residual disease assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry in transplant-eligible myeloma in the EMN02/HOVON 95 MM trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Minimal residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is the most effective tool to define a deep response in multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted an MRD correlative study of the EMN02/HO95 MM phase III trial in newly diagnosed MM patients achieving a suspected complete response before maintenance and every 6 months during maintenance. Patients received high-dose melphalan (HDM) versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) intensification, followed by bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd) versus no consolidation, and lenalidomide maintenance. Bone marrow (BM) samples were processed in three European laboratories, applying EuroFlow-based MFC protocols (eight colors, two tubes) with 10 −4−10 −5 sensitivity. At enrollment in the MRD correlative study, 76% (244/321) of patients were MRD-negative. In the intention-to-treat analysis, after a median follow-up of 75 months, 5-year progression-free survival was 66% in MRD-negative versus 31% in MRD-positive patients (HR 0.39; p < 0.001), 5-year overall survival was 86% versus 69%, respectively (HR 0.41; p < 0.001). MRD negativity was associated with reduced risk of progression or death in all subgroups, including ISS-III (HR 0.37) and high-risk fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) patients (HR 0.38;). In the 1-year maintenance MRD population, 42% of MRD-positive patients at pre-maintenance became MRD-negative after lenalidomide exposure. In conclusion, MRD by MFC is a strong prognostic factor. Lenalidomide maintenance further improved MRD-negativity rate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

          Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

            Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) plus autologous stem-cell transplantation is standard treatment in Europe for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We evaluated whether the addition of daratumumab to VTd before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation would improve stringent complete response rate in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma

              High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation has been the standard treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in adults up to 65 years of age. However, promising data on the use of combination therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) in this population have raised questions about the role and timing of transplantation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                stefania.olivamolinet@gmail.com
                Journal
                Blood Cancer J
                Blood Cancer J
                Blood Cancer Journal
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2044-5385
                3 June 2021
                3 June 2021
                June 2021
                : 11
                : 6
                : 106
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7605.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2336 6580, Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, , University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, ; Torino, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.508717.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0637 3764, Department of Hematology, , Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, , Erasmus University Medical Center, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.412554.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0609 2751, Department of Clinical Hematology, , University Hospital Brno, ; Brno, Czech Republic
                [5 ]GRID grid.6292.f, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 1758, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, , Bologna University School of Medicine, S Orsola Malpighi Hospital, ; Bologna, Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.508717.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0637 3764, HOVON Data Center, Department of Hematology, , Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [7 ]GRID grid.7841.a, Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, , Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, ; Rome, Italy
                [8 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, , Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [9 ]GRID grid.411490.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1759 6306, Clinica di Ematologia, , Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-G.M. Lancisi-G. Salesi di Ancona, ; Ancona, Italy
                [10 ]GRID grid.412725.7, Division of Hematology, , ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, ; Brescia, Italy
                [11 ]GRID grid.460094.f, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8431, Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, , ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, ; Bergamo, Italy
                [12 ]GRID grid.412727.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0609 0692, Department of Haematooncology, , University Hospital Ostrava, ; Ostrava, Czech Republic
                [13 ]GRID grid.412684.d, ISNI 0000 0001 2155 4545, Faculty of Medicine, , University of Ostrava, ; Ostrava, Czech Republic
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3084-180X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1296-120X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-3763
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-5209
                Article
                498
                10.1038/s41408-021-00498-0
                8175611
                34083504
                faa3ead5-543d-4362-b634-e437caef011d
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 March 2021
                : 25 March 2021
                : 12 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003243, Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky (Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic);
                Award ID: 17-30089A
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                risk factors,translational research
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                risk factors, translational research

                Comments

                Comment on this article