1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Associations between e-cigarette marketing exposure and vaping nicotine and cannabis among U.S. adults, 2021

      Preprint
      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance.

          Vaping has become an increasingly common method for consuming nicotine and cannabis, a trend potentially influenced by e-cigarette marketing. However, little is known about the influence of e-cigarette marketing on cannabis vaping behaviors.

          Objective.

          To examine the associations between e-cigarette marketing exposure and nicotine and cannabis vaping behaviors among adults.

          Design, Setting, and Participants.

          This cross-sectional study included a U.S. nationally representative sample of adults (≥18 years) from the Wave 6 survey of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, conducted from March to November 2021.

          Exposure.

          Past 30-day e-cigarette marketing exposure (overall and by ten marketing channels).

          Main Outcomes and Measures.

          Past 30-day vaping behavior (sole- and dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis) overall and stratified by age.

          Results.

          The study included 30,516 respondents (48.0% male and 63.9% non-Hispanic White). Overall, 52.0% of respondents reported past 30-day e-cigarette marketing exposure, and 89.8%, 5.6%, 3.2%, and 1.4% reported no vaping, sole-nicotine vaping, sole-cannabis vaping, and dual-vaping, respectively. Multinominal logistic regression results show exposure to e-cigarette marketing was associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus no vaping (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.57) and dual-vaping versus no vaping (aRR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01–1.57). Stratification analysis found these associations among those aged 18–24 and 25–34 years but not older adults (≥35 years). Those exposed to e-cigarette marketing also had increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus sole-nicotine vaping (aRR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04–1.58). Stratification analysis found this association only among those aged 18–24 years. E-cigarette marketing exposure via several channels (retail stores, billboards, events, newspapers/magazines) was associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping.

          Conclusions and Relevance.

          E-cigarette marketing exposure was only associated with sole-cannabis vaping and dual-vaping, not sole-nicotine vaping among U.S. adults. Such associations were mainly driven by young adults aged 18–24 and 25–35 years and were found for multiple marketing channels. Greater restrictions on tobacco marketing may have reduced the influence of e-cigarette marketing on nicotine vaping, while gaps in such marketing restrictions for cannabis may contribute to continued influence of e-cigarette marketing on cannabis vaping.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies.A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

            This paper describes the methods and conceptual framework for Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study data collection. The National Institutes of Health, through the National Institute on Drug Abuse, is partnering with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products to conduct the PATH Study under a contract with Westat.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              E-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Is Associated With E-Cigarette Use Among US Youth.

              E-cigarettes are currently the most commonly used tobacco product among US youth. However, unlike conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes are not subject to marketing restrictions. This study investigates the association between exposure to e-cigarette marketing and susceptibility and use of e-cigarettes in youth.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                medRxiv
                MEDRXIV
                medRxiv
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
                04 February 2024
                : 2024.02.03.24302079
                Affiliations
                [1. ]Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ
                [2. ]Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ
                [3. ]Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA
                [4. ]Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
                [5. ]Wake Forest University, School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
                [6. ]Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
                [7. ]Rutgers Addiction Research Center, Piscataway, NJ
                [8. ]George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Julia Chen-Sankey, PhD MPP, Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, 303 George St. Room 525, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, Phone: 838-932-1855, Fax: 732-235-9755, JC.Sankey@ 123456rutgers.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-5248
                Article
                10.1101/2024.02.03.24302079
                10863020
                38352380
                fa9bed95-8c7a-4d93-ad51-36e3417b7382

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

                History
                Funding
                JCS is supported by the Pathway to Independence Award in Tobacco Regulatory Science from NCI/FDA (R00CA242589) and Penn/Rutgers TCORS (U54CA229973). AG is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (TL1TR003019). MBM holds an Innovation in Regulatory Science Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
                Categories
                Article

                e-cigarettes,marketing influence,nicotine e-cigarettes,cannabis e-cigarettes

                Comments

                Comment on this article