17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk for hip fracture before and after total knee replacement in Sweden

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary

          We studied the risk for hip fracture before and after total knee replacement (TKR) in the entire population in Sweden. Women and men had a low risk for hip fracture before TKR but an increased risk the first year after TKR.

          Purpose

          It is known that osteoarthritis is associated with high bone mass. We therefore studied the risk of hip fracture before and after total knee replacement (TKR), risk of different hip fracture types, and risk subdivided in genders and age groups.

          Methods

          We followed the total Swedish population born between 1902 and 1952 ( n = 4,258,934) during the period 1987–2002 and identified all patients with TKR due to primary OA ( n = 39,291), and all patients with hip fracture ( n = 195,860) in the Swedish National Inpatient Register. The risk time analyses were based on Poisson regression models.

          Results

          The hazard ratio (HR) for hip fracture the last year before TKR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.00) and the first year after 1.26 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.42) compared to individuals without TKR. The HR for femoral neck fracture 0–10 years after TKR was 0.95 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.01) and for trochanteric fracture was 1.13 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.21). The HR for hip fracture in the age group 50–74 was 1.28 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.43) and in the age group 75–90 years was 0.99 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.04) 0–10 years after TKR, compared to individuals without TKR.

          Conclusion

          Individuals had a low risk for hip fracture before TKR but an increased risk the first year after TKR. The risk in individuals below age 75 years and for trochanteric fractures was increased after TKR. Possible explanations include changed knee kinematics after a TKR, physical activity level, fall risk, and other unknown factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk factors and burden of osteoarthritis.

          Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint disorders worldwide. Its prevalence is increasing because of the growing aging of the population in developed and developing countries as well as an increase in risk factors leading to OA, particularly obesity and a sedentary lifestyle. Risk factors of OA can be divided into person-level factors (age, gender, obesity, genetics and diet) and joint-level factors (injury, malalignment and abnormal loading of the joints) that interact in a complex manner. OA is the 11th cause of disability in the world. It is responsible for activity limitations, particularly walking, and affects participation and quality of life. Patients with OA are at greater risk of all-cause mortality, particularly for cardiovascular diseases, than the general population. This excess mortality is closely associated with disability level. Consequently, strategies to reduce burden through primary and secondary prevention programs are increasingly important.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review.

            To understand the differences in prevalence and incidence estimates of osteoarthritis (OA), according to case definition, in knee, hip and hand joints. A systematic review was carried out in PUBMED and SCOPUS databases comprising the date of publication period from January 1995 to February 2011. We attempted to summarise data on the incidence and prevalence of OA according to different methods of assessment: self-reported, radiographic and symptomatic OA (clinical plus radiographic). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Seventy-two papers were reviewed (nine on incidence and 63 on prevalence). Higher OA prevalences are seen when radiographic OA definition was used for all age groups. Prevalence meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity between studies even in each specific joint and using the same OA definition. Although the knee is the most studied joint, the highest OA prevalence estimates were found in hand joints. OA of the knee tends to be more prevalent in women than in men independently of the OA definition used, but no gender differences were found in hip and hand OA. Insufficient data for incidence studies didn't allow us to make any comparison according to joint site or OA definition. Radiographic case definition of OA presented the highest prevalences. Within each joint site, self-reported and symptomatic OA definitions appear to present similar estimates. The high heterogeneity found in the studies limited further conclusions. Copyright © 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes and Bone in Adults

              In an increasingly obese and ageing population, type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and osteoporotic fracture are major public health concerns. Understanding how obesity and type 2 diabetes modulate fracture risk is important to identify and treat people at risk of fracture. Additionally, the study of the mechanisms of action of obesity and T2DM on bone has already offered insights that may be applicable to osteoporosis in the general population. Most available evidence indicates lower risk of proximal femur and vertebral fracture in obese adults. However the risk of some fractures (proximal humerus, femur and ankle) is higher, and a significant number fractures occur in obese people. BMI is positively associated with BMD and the mechanisms of this association in vivo may include increased loading, adipokines such as leptin, and higher aromatase activity. However, some fat depots could have negative effects on bone; cytokines from visceral fat are pro-resorptive and high intramuscular fat content is associated with poorer muscle function, attenuating loading effects and increasing falls risk. T2DM is also associated with higher bone mineral density (BMD), but increased overall and hip fracture risk. There are some similarities between bone in obesity and T2DM, but T2DM seems to have additional harmful effects and emerging evidence suggests that glycation of collagen may be an important factor. Higher BMD but higher fracture risk presents challenges in fracture prediction in obesity and T2DM. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates risk, standard clinical risk factors may not capture all relevant information, and risk is under-recognised by clinicians. However, the limited available evidence suggests that osteoporosis treatment does reduce fracture risk in obesity and T2DM with generally similar efficacy to other patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cecilie.hongslo.vala@gu.se
                Journal
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporosis International
                Springer London (London )
                0937-941X
                1433-2965
                12 December 2019
                12 December 2019
                2020
                : 31
                : 5
                : 887-895
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, , University of Gothenburg, ; 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.1649.a, ISNI 000000009445082X, Region Västra Götaland, Geriatric Medicine Clinic, , Sahlgrenska University Hospital, ; 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden
                [3 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, , University of Gothenburg, ; 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden
                [4 ]GRID grid.11835.3e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Medical School, , University of Sheffield, ; S10 2RX, Sheffield, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.411958.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2194 1270, Mary McKillop Health Institute, , Australian Catholic University, ; Melbourne, VIC 3000 Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.8993.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9457, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, , Uppsala University- Campus Gotland, ; 621 57 Visby, Sweden
                [7 ]Department of Orthopedics and Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden
                [8 ]GRID grid.8761.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9919 9582, Center for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska Academy, , University of Gothenburg, ; 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8932-9686
                Article
                5241
                10.1007/s00198-019-05241-x
                7170830
                31832694
                fa87b026-6f21-4e8e-9dd0-a826da523b16
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 19 June 2019
                : 19 November 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: ALF from the Swedish government
                Award ID: ALFGBG722321
                Award ID: ALFGBG437971
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004359, Vetenskapsrådet;
                Award ID: 2017-02229
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2020

                Orthopedics
                femur neck fracture,hip fracture,osteoarthritis,total knee replacement,trochanteric fracture

                Comments

                Comment on this article