0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Canadian Fast Food Packaging

      rapid-communication

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A suite of analytical techniques was used to obtain a comprehensive picture of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in selected Canadian food packaging used for fast foods ( n = 42). Particle-induced gamma ray emission spectroscopy revealed that 55% of the samples contained <3580, 19% contained 3580–10 800, and 26% > 10 800 μg F/m 2. The highest total F (1 010 000–1 300 000 μg F/m 2) was measured in molded “compostable” bowls. Targeted analysis of 8 samples with high total F revealed 4–15 individual PFAS in each sample, with 6:2 fluorotelomer methacrylate (FTMAc) and 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (FTOH) typically dominating. Up to 34% of the total fluorine was released from samples after hydrolysis, indicating the presence of unknown precursors. Nontargeted analysis detected 22 PFAS from 6 different groups, including degradation products of FTOH. Results indicate the use of side-chain fluorinated polymers and suggest that these products can release short-chain compounds that ultimately can be transformed to compounds of toxicological concern. Analysis after 2 years of storage showed overall decreases in PFAS consistent with the loss of volatile compounds such as 6:2 FTMAc and FTOH. The use of PFAS in food packaging such as “compostable” bowls represents a regrettable substitution of single-use plastic food packaging.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins

          The primary aim of this article is to provide an overview of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) detected in the environment, wildlife, and humans, and recommend clear, specific, and descriptive terminology, names, and acronyms for PFASs. The overarching objective is to unify and harmonize communication on PFASs by offering terminology for use by the global scientific, regulatory, and industrial communities. A particular emphasis is placed on long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids, substances related to the long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids, and substances intended as alternatives to the use of the long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids or their precursors. First, we define PFASs, classify them into various families, and recommend a pragmatic set of common names and acronyms for both the families and their individual members. Terminology related to fluorinated polymers is an important aspect of our classification. Second, we provide a brief description of the 2 main production processes, electrochemical fluorination and telomerization, used for introducing perfluoroalkyl moieties into organic compounds, and we specify the types of byproducts (isomers and homologues) likely to arise in these processes. Third, we show how the principal families of PFASs are interrelated as industrial, environmental, or metabolic precursors or transformation products of one another. We pay particular attention to those PFASs that have the potential to be converted, by abiotic or biotic environmental processes or by human metabolism, into long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic or sulfonic acids, which are currently the focus of regulatory action. The Supplemental Data lists 42 families and subfamilies of PFASs and 268 selected individual compounds, providing recommended names and acronyms, and structural formulas, as well as Chemical Abstracts Service registry numbers. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2011;7:513–541. © 2011 SETAC
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Review of the Pathways of Human Exposure to Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) and Present Understanding of Health Effects

            Here we review present understanding of sources and trends in human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and epidemiologic evidence for impacts on cancer, immune function, metabolic outcomes, and neurodevelopment. More than 4000 PFASs have been manufactured by humans and hundreds have been detected in environmental samples. Direct exposures due to use in products can be quickly phased out by shifts in chemical production but exposures driven by PFAS accumulation in the ocean and marine food chains and contamination of groundwater persist over long timescales. Serum concentrations of legacy PFASs in humans are declining globally but total exposures to newer PFASs and precursor compounds have not been well characterized. Human exposures to legacy PFASs from seafood and drinking water are stable or increasing in many regions, suggesting observed declines reflect phase-outs in legacy PFAS use in consumer products. Many regions globally are continuing to discover PFAS contaminated sites from aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) use, particularly next to airports and military bases. Exposures from food packaging and indoor environments are uncertain due to a rapidly changing chemical landscape where legacy PFASs have been replaced by diverse precursors and custom molecules that are difficult to detect. Multiple studies find significant associations between PFAS exposure and adverse immune outcomes in children. Dyslipidemia is the strongest metabolic outcome associated with PFAS exposure. Evidence for cancer is limited to manufacturing locations with extremely high exposures and insufficient data are available to characterize impacts of PFAS exposures on neurodevelopment. Preliminary evidence suggests significant health effects associated with exposures to emerging PFASs. Lessons learned from legacy PFASs indicate that limited data should not be used as a justification to delay risk mitigation actions for replacement PFASs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)

              Systematic description of more than 200 uses of PFAS and the individual substances associated with each of them (over 1400 PFAS in total). Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of concern because of their high persistence (or that of their degradation products) and their impacts on human and environmental health that are known or can be deduced from some well-studied PFAS. Currently, many different PFAS (on the order of several thousands) are used in a wide range of applications, and there is no comprehensive source of information on the many individual substances and their functions in different applications. Here we provide a broad overview of many use categories where PFAS have been employed and for which function; we also specify which PFAS have been used and discuss the magnitude of the uses. Despite being non-exhaustive, our study clearly demonstrates that PFAS are used in almost all industry branches and many consumer products. In total, more than 200 use categories and subcategories are identified for more than 1400 individual PFAS. In addition to well-known categories such as textile impregnation, fire-fighting foam, and electroplating, the identified use categories also include many categories not described in the scientific literature, including PFAS in ammunition, climbing ropes, guitar strings, artificial turf, and soil remediation. We further discuss several use categories that may be prioritised for finding PFAS-free alternatives. Besides the detailed description of use categories, the present study also provides a list of the identified PFAS per use category, including their exact masses for future analytical studies aiming to identify additional PFAS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Sci Technol Lett
                Environ Sci Technol Lett
                ez
                estlcu
                Environmental Science & Technology Letters
                American Chemical Society
                2328-8930
                28 March 2023
                11 April 2023
                : 10
                : 4
                : 343-349
                Affiliations
                []Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto , Toronto M5S 3B1, ON, Canada
                []O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University , Bloomington 47405, Indiana, United States
                [§ ]Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame 46556, Indiana, United States
                []Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto , Toronto M5S 3H6, ON, Canada
                []Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame 46556, Indiana, United States
                [# ]Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich , Zürich 8093, Switzerland
                []Empa − Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Technology and Society Laboratory , St. Gallen CH-9014, Switzerland
                []School of the Environment, University of Toronto , Toronto M5S 3E8, ON, Canada
                []Green Science Policy Institute , Berkeley 94709, California, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Co-Miriam L. Diamond, e-mail: miriam.diamond@ 123456utoronto.ca .
                [* ]Marta Venier, email: mvenier@ 123456indiana.edu .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4776-0974
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2497-1907
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-604X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-648X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-7659
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-261X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-0588
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2089-8992
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-6431
                Article
                10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00926
                10637757
                37970096
                fa3746b5-d1e7-41e3-983b-3b3d9ee6ba34
                © 2023 American Chemical Society

                Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 December 2022
                : 02 March 2023
                : 01 March 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: H2020 Energy, doi 10.13039/100010679;
                Award ID: 101036756
                Funded by: Environment and Climate Change Canada, doi 10.13039/501100008638;
                Award ID: GCXE21P039
                Funded by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, doi 10.13039/501100000038;
                Award ID: RGPIN-2017-06654
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ez2c00926
                ez2c00926

                fast food packaging,pfas analysis,nontargeted pfas analysis,regrettable substitution,plant fiber-based food packaging,pfas precursors,hydrolysis assay,pfas stability

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content491

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors418