63
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Meckel's Diverticulum in Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To determine the role of laparoscopy in diagnosis and surgical treatment of perforated Meckel's diverticulum (MD) in adults.

          Methods: Between July 2003 and July 2011, fifteen patients were seen with perforated MD. Eleven were male and four were female. The median age was 38 years (range, 21-68). All patients presented with a sudden onset of pain. Among them 9 had a past medical history of bloody stools and /or chronic recurrent abdominal pain. 2 were preoperatively diagnosed with perforated MD confirmly and 4 suspiciously, 9 with perforated acute appendicitis. All 15 patients underwent exploratory laparoscopy.

          Results: 4 patients with broad-base(≧ 2 cm) and 2 patients with narrow-base(<2 cm) whose perforative site was near the base underwent laparoscopically assisted extracorporal bowel segment resection, the other 9 patients with narrow-base(<2 cm) underwent laparoscopically intraabdominal wedge resection of the MD. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. The median hospital stay was 4 days (range, 2-7days). The histopathologic studies showed heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) in 10 cases (66.7%). All patients recovered uneventfully.

          Conclusion: To patients with sudden abdomen pain mimic acute appendicitis accompanied by a past medical history of bloody stools and/or chronic recurrent abdominal pain, proferated MD should be kept in mind as a differential diagnosis. Laparoscopy is a safe and effective surgical modality for diagnosis of proferated MD and has a therapeutic role that results in an excellent cosmetic result.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incidentally detected Meckel diverticulum: to resect or not to resect?

          Management of incidentally detected Meckel diverticulum (MD) remains controversial. Our aims were to establish: (1) the prevalence of MD; (2) the morbidity and (3) mortality due to MD. Systematic review: A total of 244 papers meeting defined criteria were included; there were no prospective or randomized studies. MD prevalence and mortality from autopsy studies, postoperative complications, and outcome of incidentally detected MD were extracted. Population-based data: Data were obtained from national databases on MD as cause of death, and on number of MD resections per year. The prevalence of MD is 1.2% and historical mortality of MD was 0.01%. The current mortality from MD is 0.001%. The number of MD resections per year per 100,000 population decreased significantly after the pediatric age range (P < 0.001). Resection of incidentally detected MD has a significantly higher postoperative complication rate than leaving it in situ (P < 0.0001). The long-term outcome of patients with incidentally detected MD left in situ showed no complications. Seven-hundred fifty-eight patients would require incidentally detected MD resection to prevent 1 death from MD. MD is present in 1.2% of the population, it is a very rare cause of mortality, and it is primarily a disease of the young. Leaving an incidentally detected MD in situ reduces the risk of postoperative complications without increasing late complications. A large number of MD resections would need to be performed to prevent 1 death from MD. The above evidence does not support the resection of incidentally detected MD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The natural history of Meckel's Diverticulum and its relation to incidental removal. A study of 202 cases of diseased Meckel's Diverticulum found in King County, Washington, over a fifteen year period.

            To determine the natural history of Meckel's diverticulum, 202 case records of proved disease of Meckel's diverticulum were retrieved, covering a fifteen year period, from all the hospitals of King County, Washington (population, 1,143,800). Using the figure of 2 per cent incidence of Meckel's diverticulum, we calculated that a Meckel's diverticulum has a 4.2 per cent likelihood of causing disease during a lifetime, decreasing to zero with old age. Using previously published mortality and morbidity figures, we calculated that to save one patient's life from the complications of Meckel's diverticulum, it would be necessary to remove approximately 800 asymptomatic Meckel's diverticula. This would be likely to incur a significant amount of postoperative morbidity from postoperative intestinal obstruction and infection. We suggest that the prophylactic removal of Meckel's diverticulum is rarely, if ever, justified.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A fifty year experience with Meckel's diverticulum.

              Four hundred and two patients with Meckel's diverticulum are reviewed. Symptoms referable to the diverticulum occurred in 68 patients or 16.9 per cent of the group. Obstruction of the small intestine, inflammation and lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding accounted for 90 per cent of the presenting symptoms. A 10.3 per cent mortality and a 17.6 per cent morbidity rate were noted for symptomatic diverticuli. Patients most likely to have symptoms develop were 40 years of age, or younger; those whose diverticuli were 2 centimeters or more in length; those whose diverticuli contained heterotopic mucosa, and, probably, those who were males. Patients more than 40 years of age with diverticuli less than 2 centimeters in length with no heterotopic mucosa and who were females constitute a lower risk group. The decision to perform an incidental Meckel's diverticulectomy should be based upon the risk of the individual patient having symptoms develop from the diverticulum.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Med Sci
                Int J Med Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Medical Sciences
                Ivyspring International Publisher (Sydney )
                1449-1907
                2012
                4 May 2012
                : 9
                : 3
                : 243-247
                Affiliations
                1. Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong 250033, China.
                2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang 830000, China.
                Author notes
                ✉ Corresponding author: Qisan Wang, E-mail: wujiandao2004@ 123456163.com ; Tel.: 0086-991-7819132; Fax: 0086-991-7968111.

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

                Article
                ijmsv09p0243
                10.7150/ijms.4170
                3348529
                22577339
                fa0e759b-191a-4a71-836d-f0fd8fde3e2c
                © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
                History
                : 31 January 2012
                : 1 May 2012
                Categories
                Research Paper

                Medicine
                perforation,laparoscopy,meckel's diverticulum
                Medicine
                perforation, laparoscopy, meckel's diverticulum

                Comments

                Comment on this article