1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Are you working on research related to technology and human behavior? Are you exploring the impact of social media, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, gaming, and more? If so, we invite you to submit your manuscript to Technology, Mind, and Behavior, an open access journal from the American Psychological Association..

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perceived Shared Understanding Between Humans and Artificial Intelligence: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Scale

      article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The perception of shared understanding between individuals is key to constructive meaning-making, effective collaboration, and satisfying interaction outcomes. Recent scholarship indicates this operation extends to human–artificial intelligence interactions such that a validated instrument to capture humans’ perceived shared understanding (PSU) with artificial intelligence is key to advancing work in that domain. Building on extant exploratory work, this project develops and initially validates a PSU scale in two studies. Participants shared past large-language model conversations and then reflected on them to respond to a pool of candidate scale items. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a single-factor, eight-item solution interpreted to represent a social-semantic construal of the artificial intelligence’s shared understanding—that is, that they are sharing meaning with someone. The scale demonstrates significant associations with theoretically relevant measures; factor structure and convergent validity are replicated in a separate sample. This novel instrument points to a convergence of sociality and meaning in PSU and serves as a springboard for future research and practical applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer

          Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Technology, Mind, and Behavior
                American Psychological Association
                2689-0208
                March 14, 2025
                : 6
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1]School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University
                [2]School of Information Studies, Syracuse University
                Author notes
                Action Editor: Danielle S. McNamara was the action editor for this article.
                Funding: This work was funded by the Syracuse University Faculty Creative Activities and Research Grant Program (2023-2024 FCAR Grant) awarded to Jaime Banks.
                Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
                Author Contributions: Qingyu Liang contributed to conceptualization, data preparation, exploratory analysis, and initial writing and reporting. Jaime Banks contributed to conceptualization, data collection, exploratory analysis, confirmatory analysis, validation analyses, funding acquisition, methodology lead, supervision, secondary writing, and writing review and editing.
                Data Availability: Qingyu Liang and Jaime Banks share first authorship of this work. Open materials can be found at https://osf.io/fdz24/. Work was primarily performed at Syracuse University.
                Open Science Disclosures:

                The data are available at https://osf.io/fdz24/

                The experimental materials are available at https://osf.io/fdz24/

                [*] Jaime Banks, School of Information Studies, Syracuse University, 343D Hinds Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States banks@syr.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-4548
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7598-4337
                Article
                tmb 2025-94101-001
                10.1037/tmb0000161
                f9def3d7-e076-4763-9b44-bc98952fc28c
                © 2025 The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format for noncommercial use provided the original authors and source are credited and a link to the license is included in attribution. No derivative works are permitted under this license.

                History

                Education,Psychology,Vocational technology,Engineering,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                scale development,contextual understanding,shared understanding,meaning-making,human–artificial intelligence interaction

                Comments

                Comment on this article