2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Mutations in a putative octopamine receptor gene in amitraz-resistant cattle ticks

      , ,
      Veterinary Parasitology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The mode of action of amitraz is thought to be its toxic effects on a receptor for a neuromodulator, octopamine. Resistance could arise from modifications of this receptor so that it would not be affected by amitraz. A putative octopamine receptor cDNA was cloned and sequenced from a cattle tick in Australia. However, when the sequence was compared between Australian strains of amitraz-susceptible and resistant ticks, no differences were detected. We have sequenced this putative octopamine receptor gene in tick strains from America. The American ticks have a sequence almost identical to that of the Australian ticks with no deletions or additions in the open reading frame. In a Brazilian strain and a Mexican strain that are very resistant to amitraz, there are two nucleotide substitutions that result in amino acids different from all the susceptible strains. Discovery of these mutations only in amitraz-resistant ticks provides the first evidence for the possibility of an altered pesticide target site as a mechanism of amitraz resistance in ticks.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Veterinary Parasitology
          Veterinary Parasitology
          Elsevier BV
          03044017
          September 2007
          September 2007
          : 148
          : 3-4
          : 379-383
          Article
          10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.06.026
          17662534
          f9d0fe09-426e-4753-9a67-11ad35b25726
          © 2007

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article