6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      苯达莫司汀联合泊马度胺、地塞米松治疗伴髓外病变的复发多发性骨髓瘤:多中心研究 Translated title: Bendamustine combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease: a multicenter study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          目的

          评估苯达莫司汀联合泊马度胺、地塞米松(BPD方案)治疗伴髓外病变的复发多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的疗效和安全性。

          方法

          本项开放、单臂、多中心前瞻性研究纳入2021年2月至2022年11月在青岛市市立医院等7所医院诊断并接受BPD方案治疗的30例伴髓外病变的复发MM患者,分析其疗效及不良反应。

          结果

          30例患者中位年龄62(47~72)岁,其中18例(60.0%)为首次复发,首次复发的18例患者的总体反应率(ORR)为100%,其中完全缓解3例(16.7%),非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)10例(55.5%),部分缓解(PR)5例(27.8%)。12例二线以上治疗后复发患者的ORR为50%,其中≥VGPR 0例,PR 6例(50%),疾病稳定3例(25%),疾病进展3例(25%)。所有患者的1年无进展生存率为65.2%(95% CI 37.2%~83.1%),1年总生存率为90.0%(95% CI 76.2%~95.4%)。常见的3~4级血液学不良反应包括中性粒细胞减少2例(6.7%),血小板减少1例(3.3%),总体不良反应可控。

          结论

          BPD方案在伴髓外病变的复发MM患者中具有良好的疗效和耐受性。

          Translated abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bendamustine combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone(BPD regimen)in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma(MM)with extramedullary disease.

          Methods

          This open, single-arm, multicenter prospective cohort study included 30 relapsed MM patients with extramedullary disease diagnosed in seven hospitals including Qingdao Municipal Hospital. The patients were treated with BPD regimen from February 2021 to November 2022. This study analyzed the efficacy and adverse reactions of the BPD regimen.

          Results

          The median age of the 30 patients was 62(47–72)years, of which 18(60%)had first-time recurrence. The overall response rate(ORR)of the 18 patients with first-time recurrence was 100%, of which three(16.7%)achieved complete remission, 10(55.5%)achieved very good partial remission(VGPR), and five(27.8%)achieved partial remission(PR). The ORR of 12 patients with recurrence after second-line or above treatment was 50%, including zero patients with ≥VGPR and six patients(50%)with PR. Three cases(25%)had stable disease, and three cases(25%)had disease progression. The one-year progression free survival rate of all patients was 65.2%(95% CI 37.2%–83.1%), and the 1-year overall survival rate was 90.0%(95% CI 76.2%–95.4%). The common grade 3–4 hematology adverse reactions included two cases(6.7%)of neutropenia and one case(3.3%)of thrombocytopenia. The overall adverse reactions are controllable.

          Conclusion

          The BPD regimen has good efficacy and tolerance in relapsed MM patients with extramedullary disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

          Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cereblon is a direct protein target for immunomodulatory and antiproliferative activities of lenalidomide and pomalidomide.

            Thalidomide and the immunomodulatory drug, lenalidomide, are therapeutically active in hematological malignancies. The ubiquitously expressed E3 ligase protein cereblon (CRBN) has been identified as the primary teratogenic target of thalidomide. Our studies demonstrate that thalidomide, lenalidomide and another immunomodulatory drug, pomalidomide, bound endogenous CRBN and recombinant CRBN-DNA damage binding protein-1 (DDB1) complexes. CRBN mediated antiproliferative activities of lenalidomide and pomalidomide in myeloma cells, as well as lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-induced cytokine production in T cells. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide inhibited autoubiquitination of CRBN in HEK293T cells expressing thalidomide-binding competent wild-type CRBN, but not thalidomide-binding defective CRBN(YW/AA). Overexpression of CRBN wild-type protein, but not CRBN(YW/AA) mutant protein, in KMS12 myeloma cells, amplified pomalidomide-mediated reductions in c-myc and IRF4 expression and increases in p21(WAF-1) expression. Long-term selection for lenalidomide resistance in H929 myeloma cell lines was accompanied by a reduction in CRBN, while in DF15R myeloma cells resistant to both pomalidomide and lenalidomide, CRBN protein was undetectable. Our biophysical, biochemical and gene silencing studies show that CRBN is a proximate, therapeutically important molecular target of lenalidomide and pomalidomide.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

              Few effective treatments exist for patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma not responding to treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide. Pomalidomide alone has shown limited efficacy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, but synergistic effects have been noted when combined with dexamethasone. We compared the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone with high-dose dexamethasone alone in these patients. This multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial was undertaken in Australia, Canada, Europe, Russia, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they had been diagnosed with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, and had failed at least two previous treatments of bortezomib and lenalidomide. They were assigned in a 2:1 ratio with a validated interactive voice and internet response system to either 28 day cycles of pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, orally) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, orally) or high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20, orally) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were age (≤75 years vs >75 years), disease population (refractory vs relapsed and refractory vs bortezomib intolerant), and number of previous treatments (two vs more than two). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01311687, and with EudraCT, number 2010-019820-30. The accrual for the study has been completed and the analyses are presented. 302 patients were randomly assigned to receive pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and 153 high-dose dexamethasone. After a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 7·2-13·2), median PFS with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was 4·0 months (95% CI 3·6-4·7) versus 1·9 months (1·9-2·2) with high-dose dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·39-0·60]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and high-dose dexamethasone groups were neutropenia (143 [48%] of 300 vs 24 [16%] of 150, respectively), anaemia (99 [33%] vs 55 [37%], respectively), and thrombocytopenia (67 [22%] vs 39 [26%], respectively). Grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and high-dose dexamethasone groups included pneumonia (38 [13%] vs 12 [8%], respectively), bone pain (21 [7%] vs seven [5%], respectively), and fatigue (16 [5%] vs nine [6%], respectively). There were 11 (4%) treatment-related adverse events leading to death in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone group and seven (5%) in the high-dose dexamethasone group. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, an oral regimen, could be considered a new treatment option in patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Celgene Corporation. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi
                Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi
                CJH
                Chinese Journal of Hematology
                Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology (No. 288, Nanjing road, Heping district, Tianjin )
                0253-2727
                2707-9740
                August 2023
                : 44
                : 8
                : 667-671
                Affiliations
                [1 ] 康复大学青岛医院(青岛市市立医院)血液科,青岛 266071 Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266071, China
                [2 ] 烟台毓璜顶医院血液科,烟台 264099 Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264099, China
                [3 ] 威海市立医院血液科,威海 264299 Weihai Municipal Hospital, Weihai 264299, China
                [4 ] 山东大学齐鲁医院血液科,青岛 266035 Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Qingdao 266035, China
                [5 ] 潍坊市人民医院血液科,潍坊 261044 Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261044, China
                [6 ] 胜利油田中心医院血液科,东营 257099 Shengli Oilfield Center Hospital, Dongying 257099, China
                [7 ] 青岛市海慈医疗集团,青岛 266033 Qingdao Haici Medical Group, Qingdao 266033, China
                Author notes
                通信作者:钟玉萍(Zhong Yuping),Email: zhongyp3352@ 123456126.com
                Article
                cjh-44-08-667
                10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2023.08.009
                10520229
                f946104d-38d7-4c87-9135-405d1a08c998
                2023年版权归中华医学会所有Copyright © 2023 by Chinese Medical Association

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

                History
                : 16 February 2023
                Categories
                论著

                多发性骨髓瘤,盐酸苯达莫司汀,泊马度胺,髓外病变,multiple myeloma,bendamustine hydrochloride,pomalidomide,extramedullary disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article