33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors influencing wild boar damage to agricultural crops in Sardinia (Italy)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Crop damage by wildlife is a frequent source of human–wildlife conflict. Understanding which factors increase the risk of damage is crucial to the development of effective management strategies. The aims of this study were to provide a general description of agricultural damage caused by wild boar Sus scrofa meridionalis over a 7-year period in North-eastern Sardinia (Mediterranean Italy), and to formulate a predictive model of damage risk. We recorded a total of 221 cases of wild boar damage, with economic losses amounting to 483,982 Euros. Damage events mostly involved vineyards, meadows and oat fields, and were characterized by a peak incidence in summer and early autumn, and a minimum in spring. Damaged fields were characterized by an increasing presence of permanent crops, a decreasing presence of woodlands, maquis and urban areas, and a reduced distance from shelter areas (forests and shrublands). The analysis of spatiotemporal variation of boar-induced damage and the identification of factors that augment the risk of damage provides essential information for contributing to the development of a more effective plan for managing wild boar populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe.

            Across Europe, wild boar numbers increased in the 1960s-1970s but stabilised in the 1980s; recent evidence suggests that the numbers and impact of wild boar has grown steadily since the 1980s. As hunting is the main cause of mortality for this species, we reviewed wild boar hunting bags and hunter population trends in 18 European countries from 1982 to 2012. Hunting statistics and numbers of hunters were used as indicators of animal numbers and hunting pressure. The results confirmed that wild boar increased consistently throughout Europe, while the number of hunters remained relatively stable or declined in most countries. We conclude that recreational hunting is insufficient to limit wild boar population growth and that the relative impact of hunting on wild boar mortality had decreased. Other factors, such as mild winters, reforestation, intensification of crop production, supplementary feeding and compensatory population responses of wild boar to hunting pressure might also explain population growth. As populations continue to grow, more human-wild boar conflicts are expected unless this trend is reversed. New interdisciplinary approaches are urgently required to mitigate human-wild boar conflicts, which are otherwise destined to grow further. © 2014 Crown copyright. Pest Management Science © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Curr Zool
                Curr Zool
                czoolo
                Current Zoology
                Oxford University Press
                1674-5507
                October 2017
                03 October 2016
                03 October 2016
                : 63
                : 5
                : 507-514
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
                [b ]Province of Olbia-Tempio, Via A. Nanni 17/19, 07026 Olbia, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to Marco Lombardini. E-mail: zarc00@ 123456yahoo.it .
                Article
                zow099
                10.1093/cz/zow099
                5804203
                29492010
                f8b6a2a4-b54d-49ba-b575-7a374e3a288c
                © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 19 July 2016
                : 28 September 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                Articles

                human–wildlife conflict,sus scrofa meridionalis,risk modelling,landscape structure,wild boar management

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                74
                4
                45
                0
                Smart Citations
                74
                4
                45
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content302

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors1,024