19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-term effect of a 24-week multicomponent intervention on physical performance and frailty in community-dwelling older adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Multicomponent interventions improve physical function and frailty in older adults, but their long-term benefit remains uncertain.

          Methods

          This prospective non-randomised study was conducted in 383 older Koreans (mean age, 76.8 years; female 72.3%) who were living alone or receiving medical aid. Of these, 187 individuals chose to receive a 24-week intervention that consisted of group exercise, nutritional supplements, depression management, deprescribing and home hazard reduction. The remaining 196 individuals received usual care. We compared the short physical performance battery (SPPB) score (0–12 points), frailty phenotype scale (0–5 points) and deficit-accumulation frailty index (0–1) at baseline, 6, 18 and 30 months.

          Results

          After 1:1 propensity score matching ( n = 117 per group), the mean SPPB scores for the intervention and comparison groups were 7.6 versus 7.6 at baseline, 10.7 versus 7.1 at 6 months (mean difference, 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8–4.2), 9.1 versus 7.8 at 18 months (1.3; 95% CI, 0.6–2.0) and 8.6 versus 7.5 at 30 months (1.1; 95% CI, 0.4–1.8). The intervention group had lower frailty phenotype scale (1.1 versus 1.8; difference, −0.7; 95% CI −1.0 to −0.3) and frailty index (0.22 versus 0.27; difference, −0.04; −0.06 to −0.02) at 6 months, but similar scores at 18 and 30 months. The 30-month mean institutionalisation-free survival time was 28.5 months in the intervention group versus 23.3 months in the comparison group (difference, 5.2 months; 95% CI, 3.1–7.4).

          Conclusions

          The 24-week multicomponent intervention showed sustained improvement in physical function, temporary reduction in frailty and longer institutionalisation-free survival over 30 months.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

          L Radloff (1977)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

              Objectives To describe new WHO 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Methods The guidelines were developed in accordance with WHO protocols. An expert Guideline Development Group reviewed evidence to assess associations between physical activity and sedentary behaviour for an agreed set of health outcomes and population groups. The assessment used and systematically updated recent relevant systematic reviews; new primary reviews addressed additional health outcomes or subpopulations. Results The new guidelines address children, adolescents, adults, older adults and include new specific recommendations for pregnant and postpartum women and people living with chronic conditions or disability. All adults should undertake 150–300 min of moderate-intensity, or 75–150 min of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or some equivalent combination of moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity, per week. Among children and adolescents, an average of 60 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic physical activity across the week provides health benefits. The guidelines recommend regular muscle-strengthening activity for all age groups. Additionally, reducing sedentary behaviours is recommended across all age groups and abilities, although evidence was insufficient to quantify a sedentary behaviour threshold. Conclusion These 2020 WHO guidelines update previous WHO recommendations released in 2010. They reaffirm messages that some physical activity is better than none, that more physical activity is better for optimal health outcomes and provide a new recommendation on reducing sedentary behaviours. These guidelines highlight the importance of regularly undertaking both aerobic and muscle strengthening activities and for the first time, there are specific recommendations for specific populations including for pregnant and postpartum women and people living with chronic conditions or disability. These guidelines should be used to inform national health policies aligned with the WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030 and to strengthen surveillance systems that track progress towards national and global targets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Age Ageing
                Age Ageing
                ageing
                Age and Ageing
                Oxford University Press
                0002-0729
                1468-2834
                November 2021
                05 August 2021
                05 August 2021
                : 50
                : 6
                : 2157-2166
                Affiliations
                Marcus Institute for Aging Research , Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA
                Division of Geriatrics , Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Division of Pulmonary , Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Division of Geriatrics , Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Harvard T.H.Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA 02115, USA
                Division of Geriatrics , Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Division of Geriatrics , Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Division of Geriatrics , Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                PyeongChang Health Center and County Hospital , PyeongChang, Gangwon-Do, Republic of Korea
                Division of Gerontology , Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
                Marcus Institute for Aging Research , Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA
                Division of Gerontology , Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Il-Young Jang, Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea. Tel: (+82) 2-3010-1658; Fax: (+82) 504-476-9099. Email: onezero2@ 123456gmail.com

                Gahee Oh and Heayon Lee contributed equally.

                Article
                afab149
                10.1093/ageing/afab149
                8581390
                34351363
                f876d5e5-6de9-4c9c-985a-67dee5be237f
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 2 January 2021
                : 31 May 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging, DOI 10.13039/100000049;
                Award ID: P30AG048785
                Award ID: P30AG031679
                Award ID: R21AG060227
                Award ID: R01AG062713
                Award ID: R01AG056368
                Funded by: Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, DOI 10.13039/501100005006;
                Award ID: 2020IF0001
                Funded by: Ministry of Health and Welfare, DOI 10.13039/100008903;
                Award ID: HI18C2383
                Categories
                Editor's Choice
                Research Paper
                AcademicSubjects/MED00280
                ageing/5

                Geriatric medicine
                clinical trial,community health services,frailty,mortality,physical fitness,older people

                Comments

                Comment on this article