4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cross-arterial Repair in Digital Revascularization

      review-article
      , BMBCH, MRCS 1 , , , BSc (Hons), (Physiother) 1 , , BM, MSc, FRCS(Plast) 1
      Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In digital revascularization, it may not be feasible to do primary end-to-end arterial anastomosis due to a segmental defect. In this situation, some opt for an immediate vein graft to bridge the defect. However, this may not be possible if there is no distal vessel on the same side as the arterial defect. Cross-arterial anastomosis (proximal radial digital artery [RDA] to distal ulnar digital artery or vice versa) is a solution in these scenarios where segmental defects do not allow for primary anastomosis. 1,2 The technique minimizes operative time and can potentially avoid vein grafting. This technique also avoids the need to opt for cross-finger arterial anastomosis, which introduces unacceptable donor site morbidity to the adjacent uninjured digit. 3 We describe our use of this technique in 3 cases of devascularized digit salvage. Scenario A: Pulp replantation Tamai level 2. A 75-year-old man sustained a partial amputation to his non-dominant thumb, with only a dorsal skin bridge remaining intact. The proximal ulnar digital artery (UDA) was identified; however, the distal end UDA could not be identified secondary to segmental damage. The distal end of the RDA was indentified. It was a good caliber match to the proximal UDA, which had excellent arterial flow, unlike the proximal RDA, where flow was poor. Tensionless anastomosis was performed with 9/0 nylon. We use microligaclips to ligate side branches to facilitate advancement of the proximal vessel. Scenario B: Thumb volar-oblique revascularization. A 66-year-old man sustained a degloving injury to the entire volar thumb following a crush injury. The only proximal vessel identified was the RDA, and only distal vessel was the UDA. Primary cross-arterial anastomosis was performed with 10/0 nylon; the patient experienced congestion, but the entire pulp was salvaged with good result. In pulp replantation, the cross-arterial anastomosis is a good backup to minimize operative time and the need for vein grafting (Fig. 1). Scenario C: Index finger revascularization with cross-arterial vein graft. A 28-year-old man sustained a partial amputation extending through the distal interphalangeal joint to the proximal interphalangeal joint following an angle grinder injury. A large segmental gap was identified, and only 1 vessel distally (RDA) and 1 proximally (UDA) were found to be intact; however, the gap was too great for direct anastomosis. Therefore, a reversed cross-arterial vein graft was performed. The patient’s recovery was uneventful (Fig. 2). Cross-arterial anastomosis is a useful method in digital revascularization in settings where end-to-end anastomosis cannot be achieved on the same side of the digit due to segmental injury. It minimizes operative time, and all cases in this series were performed within 3 hours and with the patient awake (regional or local anesthesia). As a last resort, a vein graft can also be used in the rare setting of a cross-arterial repair with segmental loss of bilateral arteries. Cross-finger revascularization from a neighboring digit may still be necessary in the mangled hand or in ring avulsion injury where cross-arterial anastomosis is not possible. 4 Hand surgeons should be aware of the option for cross-arterial anastomosis before they consider other options, particularly terminalization of a digit. Fig. 1. Cross-arterial anastomosis in thumb revascularization. Fig. 2. Cross-arterial anastomosis with vein graft in index finger revascularization. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Verbal informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for their anonymized information to be published in this article. Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust does not require ethical approval for reporting individual cases or case series.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Microvascular management of ring avulsion injuries.

          Microsurgical revascularization has proved to be a useful method in managing the ring avulsion injury where both neurovascular bundles are damaged with only partial skin avulsion. Representative cases are used to illustrate guidelines for a practical classification for helping to decide the optimal method of treatment of acute ring avulsion injuries in light of digital revascularization techniques. Nine ring fingers were successfully revascularized of 24 acute ring avulsion injuries reviewed. Sensibility recovery was good and a functional range of motion obtained. No patient who has had his ring finger revascularized has requested its amputation because of appearance, painful neuromas, stiffness, or cold intolerance. Complete amputations, especially proximal to the superficialis insertion, and complete degloving injuries of the ring finger are usually best managed by surgical amputation of the digit.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Finger replantation: surgical technique and indications.

            In this article, we discuss the surgical technique of finger replantation in detail, distinguishing particularities of technique in cases of thumb amputation, children fingertip replantation, ring finger avulsion, and very distal replantations. We emphasize the principles of bone shortening, the spare part concept, the special importance of nerve sutures and the use of vein graft in case of avulsion or crushing. However, even if finger replantation is now a routine procedure, a clear distinction should be made between revascularization and functional success. The indications for finger replantation are then detailed in the second part of this paper. The absolute indications for replantation are thumb, multiple fingers, transmetacarpal or hand, and any upper extremity amputation in a child whatever the level. Fingertip amputations distal to the insertion of the Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) are also a good indication. Other cases are more controversial because of the poor functional outcome, especially for the index finger, which is often functionally excluded.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transfer of vessels in the management of thumb and ring avulsion injuries.

              The main problem in avulsion or degloving injury is the extensive damage to long segments of vessels which makes direct suture of the structures difficult. Various techniques have been proposed over the years to bypass the segment of an injured vessel. Many of these are difficult and often require the execution of several vascular anastomoses. The transfer of vessels from adjacent fingers, as proposed by Doi, is a valid alternative. During the 5-year period from 1988 to 1993, vessel transfer from adjacent fingers was carried out on 15 patients. Three patients suffered incomplete amputation and 5 patients suffered complete amputation of the thumb. In 5 cases these were severe crush injuries and in 3 cases they were avulsion injuries. Seven patients suffered ring avulsion injuries of various degrees. The simplicity and reliability of the method (one case was unsuccessful) make this an important technique in the treatment of crush and avulsion injuries of the thumb as well as of ring avulsion injuries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2169-7574
                26 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 9
                : 1
                : e3365
                Affiliations
                [1]From the Plastic Surgery Department, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, Hampstead, London, UK.
                Author notes
                Natalie Redgrave, Plastic Surgery Department, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, Hampstead, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom, E-mail: natalie.redgrave@ 123456nhs.net
                Article
                00053
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000003365
                7861877
                f7e7b45d-75fa-4952-9f8b-e71a634404b1
                Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 3 November 2020
                : 24 November 2020
                Categories
                Viewpoint
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                UNITED KINGDOM

                Comments

                Comment on this article