8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What do we know about the epidemiology of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents? A systematic review of the literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) was a new diagnosis in DSM‐5. This systematic review explores what is known to date about the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents.

          Method

          Embase, Medline and PsycInfo were used to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

          Results

          Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, with most coming from specialised eating disorder services where prevalence rates were 5%–22.5%. Three studies from specialist feeding clinics showed the highest prevalence rates, ranging from 32% to 64%. Studies from non‐clinical samples reported ARFID prevalence estimates ranging from 0.3% to 15.5%. One study, using national surveillance methodology, reported the incidence of ARFID in children and adolescents reaching clinical care to be 2.02 per 100,000 patients. Psychiatric comorbidity was common, especially anxiety disorders (9.1%–72%) and autism spectrum disorder (8.2%–54.75%).

          Conclusion

          The current literature on the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents is limited. Studies are heterogeneous with regard to setting and sample characteristics, with a wide range of prevalence estimates. Further studies, especially using surveillance methodology, will help to better understand the nature of this disorder and estimate clinical service needs.

          Highlights

          • ARFID prevalence estimates vary widely across studies and are highest in specialist feeding clinics. The one incidence study to date suggests that new presentations to clinical care are relatively rare.

          • ARFID has a high rate of psychiatric comorbidity especially with anxiety disorders.

          • Further epidemiological studies, especially using national surveillance methodology, will help planning and resource allocation for this patient group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)

            Objectives The aim of this study was to develop a critical appraisal (CA) tool that addressed study design and reporting quality as well as the risk of bias in cross-sectional studies (CSSs). In addition, the aim was to produce a help document to guide the non-expert user through the tool. Design An initial scoping review of the published literature and key epidemiological texts was undertaken prior to the formation of a Delphi panel to establish key components for a CA tool for CSSs. A consensus of 80% was required from the Delphi panel for any component to be included in the final tool. Results An initial list of 39 components was identified through examination of existing resources. An international Delphi panel of 18 medical and veterinary experts was established. After 3 rounds of the Delphi process, the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was developed by consensus and consisted of 20 components. A detailed explanatory document was also developed with the tool, giving expanded explanation of each question and providing simple interpretations and examples of the epidemiological concepts being examined in each question to aid non-expert users. Conclusions CA of the literature is a vital step in evidence synthesis and therefore evidence-based decision-making in a number of different disciplines. The AXIS tool is therefore unique and was developed in a way that it can be used across disciplines to aid the inclusion of CSSs in systematic reviews, guidelines and clinical decision-making.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems

              (2019)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.sanchez-cerezo@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                Eur Eat Disord Rev
                Eur Eat Disord Rev
                10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0968
                ERV
                European Eating Disorders Review
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1072-4133
                1099-0968
                16 December 2022
                March 2023
                : 31
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/erv.v31.2 )
                : 226-246
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Psychiatry Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London UK
                [ 2 ] Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Javier Sanchez‐Cerezo, Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, 2nd Floor Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, W12 0NN, London, UK.

                Email: j.sanchez-cerezo@ 123456imperial.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9329-5335
                Article
                ERV2964
                10.1002/erv.2964
                10108140
                36527163
                f7328a80-b3f1-4dd0-8176-3bc1cc933bb5
                © 2022 The Authors. European Eating Disorders Review published by Eating Disorders Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 November 2022
                : 16 May 2022
                : 06 December 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 21, Words: 12322
                Funding
                Funded by: Fundación Alicia Koplowitz , doi 10.13039/100008062;
                Funded by: National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:17.04.2023

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                arfid,children and adolescents,epidemiology,incidence,prevalence
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                arfid, children and adolescents, epidemiology, incidence, prevalence

                Comments

                Comment on this article