16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Failure Pressures of Dural Repairs in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model: Novel Use of Titanium Clips Versus Tissue Glue

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Endoscopic skull base surgery is advancing, and it is important to have reliable methods to repair the resulting defect. The objective of this study was to determine the failure pressures of 2 commonly used methods to repair large dural defects: collagen matrix underlay with fibrin glue and collagen matrix underlay with polyethylene glue, as well as a novel repair method: fascia lata with nonpenetrating titanium vascular clips.

          Methods

          The failure pressure of the 3 dural repairs was determined in a closed testing apparatus. Defects in porcine dura were created and collagen matrix grafts were used as an underlay followed by either fibrin glue (FG/CMG) or polyethylene glycol glue (PEG/CMG). A third condition using a segment of fascia lata was positioned flush with the edges of the dural defect and secured with titanium clips (TC/FL). Saline was infused to simulate increasing intracranial pressure (ICP) applied to the undersurface of the grafts until the repairs failed.

          Results

          The mean failure pressure of the PEG/CMG repair was 34.506 ± 14.822 cm H 2O, FG/CMG was 12.413 ± 5.114 cm H 2O, and TC/FL was 8.330 ± 3.483 cm H 2O. There were statistically significant differences in mean failure pressures among the 3 repair methods.

          Conclusion

          In this ex vivo model comparing skull base repairs’ ability to withstand cerebrospinal fluid leak, the repairs that utilized PEG/CMG tolerated the greatest amount of pressure and was the only repair that exceeded normal physiologic ICP’s. Repair methods utilizing glues generally tolerated higher pressures compared to the novel repair using clips alone.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment.

          Spinal anaesthesia developed in the late 1800s with the work of Wynter, Quincke and Corning. However, it was the German surgeon, Karl August Bier in 1898, who probably gave the first spinal anaesthetic. Bier also gained first-hand experience of the disabling headache related to dural puncture. He correctly surmised that the headache was related to excessive loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In the last 50 yr, the development of fine-gauge spinal needles and needle tip modification, has enabled a significant reduction in the incidence of post-dural puncture headache. Though it is clear that reducing the size of the dural perforation reduces the loss of CSF, there are many areas regarding the pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of post-dural puncture headache that remain contentious. How does the microscopic pattern of collagen alignment in the spinal dura affect the dimensions of the dural perforation? How do needle design, size and orientation influence leakage of CSF through the dural perforation? Can pharmacological methods reduce the symptoms of post-dural puncture headache? By which mechanism does the epidural blood patch cure headache? Is there a role for the prophylactic epidural blood patch? Do epidural saline, dextran, opioids and tissue glues reduce the rate of CSF loss? This review considers these contentious aspects of post-dural puncture headache.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence.

            Systematically review the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal techniques to reconstruct large skull base defects (ESBR). Such surgical innovation is likely to be reported in case series, retrospective cohorts, or case-control studies rather than higher level evidence. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Embase (1980-December 7, 2010) and MEDLINE (1950-November 14, 2010) were searched using a search strategy designed to include any publication on endoscopic endonasal reconstruction of the skull base. A title search selected those articles relevant to the clinical or basic science of an endoscopic approach. A subsequent abstract search selected articles of any defect other than simple cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula, sella only, meningoceles, or simple case reports. The articles selected were subject to full-text review to extract data on perioperative outcomes for ESBR. Surgical technique was used for subgroup analysis. There were 4,770 articles selected initially, and full-text analysis produced 38 studies with extractable data regarding ESBR. Of these articles, 12 described a vascularized reconstruction, 17 described free graft, and nine were mixed reconstructions. Three had mixed data in clearly defined patient groups that could be used for meta-analysis. The overall CSF leak rate was 11.5% (70/609). This was represented as a 15.6% leak rate (51/326) for free grafts and a 6.7% leak rate (19/283) for the vascularized reconstructions (χ(2) = 11.88, P = .001). Current evidence suggests that ESBR with vascularized tissue is associated with a lower rate of CSF leaks compared to free tissue graft and is similar to reported closure rates in open surgical repair. Copyright © 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ENDOSCOPIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CRANIAL BASE USING A PEDICLED NASOSEPTAL FLAP

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Allergy Rhinol (Providence)
                Allergy Rhinol (Providence)
                AAR
                spaar
                Allergy & Rhinology
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2152-6575
                2152-6567
                30 September 2019
                Jan-Dec 2019
                : 10
                : 2152656719879677
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
                [3 ]Uniformed Services, University of Health Sciences and San Antonio Uniformed Health Sciences Educational Consortium, Joint Base San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
                Author notes
                [*]Philip G. Chen, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7777, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. Email: p_g_chen@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-4306
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-3324
                Article
                10.1177_2152656719879677
                10.1177/2152656719879677
                6769216
                f6cf8482-d81f-4f86-bfe0-2fe1813bdcf6
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2019

                Immunology
                skull base,cerebrospinal fluid leak repair,dura,failure strength,titanium clips,tissue glue
                Immunology
                skull base, cerebrospinal fluid leak repair, dura, failure strength, titanium clips, tissue glue

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content172

                Most referenced authors401