5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Six-Month Persistence and Multi-domain Effectiveness of Guselkumab in Adults with Psoriatic Arthritis: Real-World Data from the CorEvitas Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The aim of this work is to evaluate treatment persistence and clinical outcomes after 6 months of on-label guselkumab use in patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) enrolled in the CorEvitas PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry.

          Methods

          Participants with PsA who initiated and persisted with on-label guselkumab use post-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for active PsA (7/13/2020; subcutaneous 100 mg at weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks) at their 6-month follow-up visit (occurring through 3/31/2023) comprised the primary analysis population (On-Label Persisters). Hierarchical, multiplicity-controlled primary and secondary outcomes were mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline at 6 months in clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA; primary), Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of arthritis and psoriasis (visual analog scale [VAS] 0–100), patient-reported pain (VAS 0–100), and percent body surface area with psoriasis (%BSA). Paired tests determined changes that were statistically significantly different from 0 ( α = 0.05).

          Results

          Among 114 patients who initiated on-label guselkumab and had eligible baseline and 6-month visits, 90 (78.9%) had persistent use. Among these On-Label Persisters at baseline, mean duration of PsA symptoms = 13.6 years; mean cDAPSA, PGA, and patient-reported pain = 22.0, 42.3, and 57.0, respectively; 94.4% had a history of psoriasis (mean BSA 7.6%); and 18.9% and 73.3%, respectively, previously received 1 or ≥ 2 biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The mean change (improvement) in cDAPSA was − 5.4 (− 8.5, − 2.3; p < 0.001) at 6 months. Significant mean improvements in PGA (− 19.0 [− 24.2, − 13.8]), patient-reported pain (− 9.1 [− 14.4, − 3.8]), and %BSA (− 5.1 [− 7.6, − 2.7]) were also observed (all p < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          In this real-world PsA population, generally characterized by longstanding, treatment-resistant, active disease at baseline, persistent guselkumab use in nearly 80% of patients with on-label use was accompanied by significant improvements in joint and skin symptoms and patient-reported pain at 6 months. These registry data support results from randomized clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of guselkumab in improving PsA signs and symptoms.

          Trial Registration

          clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02530268.

          Graphic abstract

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-023-00582-w.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update

          Objective To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was followed by a consensus meeting to develop this update involving 28 international taskforce members in May 2019. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined. Results The updated recommendations comprise 6 overarching principles and 12 recommendations. The overarching principles address the nature of PsA and diversity of both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations; the need for collaborative management and shared decision-making is highlighted. The recommendations provide a treatment strategy for pharmacological therapies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local glucocorticoid injections are proposed as initial therapy; for patients with arthritis and poor prognostic factors, such as polyarthritis or monoarthritis/oligoarthritis accompanied by factors such as dactylitis or joint damage, rapid initiation of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is recommended. If the treatment target is not achieved with this strategy, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17A or IL-12/23 should be initiated, taking into account skin involvement if relevant. If axial disease predominates, a TNF inhibitor or IL-17A inhibitor should be started as first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors is addressed primarily after bDMARD failure. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition is proposed for patients in whom these other drugs are inappropriate, generally in the context of mild disease. Drug switches and tapering in sustained remission are addressed. Conclusion These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological management of PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis.

            To update the 2009 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for the spectrum of manifestations affecting patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis

              A structure for representation of patient outcome is presented, together with a method for outcome measurement and validation of the technique in rheumatoid arthritis. The paradigm represents outcome by five separate dimensions: death, discomfort, disability, drug (therapeutic) toxicity, and dollar cost. Each dimension represents an outcome directly related to patient welfare. Quantitation of these outcome dimensions may be performed at interview or by patient questionnaire. With standardized, validated questions, similar scores are achieved by both methods. The questionnaire technique is preferred since it is inexpensive and does not require interobserver validation. These techniques appear extremely useful for evaluation of long term outcome of patients with rheumatic diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                pmease@philipmease.com
                Journal
                Rheumatol Ther
                Rheumatol Ther
                Rheumatology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2198-6576
                2198-6584
                19 August 2023
                19 August 2023
                December 2023
                : 10
                : 6
                : 1479-1501
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.34477.33, ISNI 0000000122986657, Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, ; 601 Broadway, Ste 600, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.25879.31, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8972, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, ; Philadelphia, PA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.459941.4, ISNI 0000 0000 9763 7243, Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates, P.C., ; Phoenix, AZ USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.497530.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0389 4927, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, ; Horsham, PA USA
                [5 ]University of Saskatchewan, ( https://ror.org/010x8gc63) Saskatoon, Canada
                [6 ]Drexel University College of Medicine, ( https://ror.org/04bdffz58) Philadelphia, PA USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.518654.b, ISNI 0000 0004 9181 6442, CorEvitas, LLC, ; Waltham, MA USA
                [8 ]Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Specialists, Shreveport, LA USA
                [9 ]University of California San Diego, ( https://ror.org/0168r3w48) La Jolla, CA USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-0457
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4639-0775
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2706-7171
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-9709
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0176-4435
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7957-838X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-6350
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5352-3794
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3556-3279
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6942-5830
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6514-4353
                Article
                582
                10.1007/s40744-023-00582-w
                10654277
                37597159
                f6c6bc0c-a516-4179-8cca-7f81b2adff6a
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 June 2023
                : 27 June 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005205, Janssen Research and Development;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                psoriatic arthritis,biologics,guselkumab,real-world evidence

                Comments

                Comment on this article