6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors of local control in adrenal metastases treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study is aimed to explore risk factors affect the therapy outcomes of adrenal metastases (AM) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and guide clinical dose selection.

          Methods and materials

          PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched in September 22, 2022 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to search for sources of heterogeneity and identify risky outcomes factors. Publication bias test and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.

          Results

          Thirty-three studies with full text from 2009 to 2022 about AM with SBRT on 1483 patients were included. Pooled 1- and 2-year local control (LC) and overall survival(OS) were 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.6%-86.5%), 62.8% (95% CI, 53.8%-71.8%), 67.4% (95%CI, 61.8%-73.1%) and 46.5% (95%CI, 40.4%-52.6%), respectively. Biological effective dose (BED, α/β=10Gy) and dose per fraction affected 1-year LC (Qm=23.89, 15.10; P<0.0001, 0.0001). In the range of 60-80Gy (BED 10), the group of dose per fraction ≥ 9Gy achieved the excellent 1-year LC (< 9Gy: ≥ 9Gy =78%, 91%; χ 2 =  10.16, P = 0.001). Tracking technology significantly affected 1- and 2-year OS (Qm = 5.73, 8.75; P = 0.017, 0.003) and high tracking adoption group showed excellent 1- and 2- year OS (78.7% [95%CI, 68.6%- 88.9%]; and 62.9% [95%CI, 53.1%-72.7%]).

          Conclusion

          Increasing the dose per fraction appropriately may help control locally AM lesious. Tracking technology might contribute to improve survival of advanced patients with AM. But these results need prospective studies to verify them.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers: Long-Term Results of the SABR-COMET Phase II Randomized Trial

          PURPOSE The oligometastatic paradigm hypothesizes that patients with a limited number of metastases may achieve long-term disease control, or even cure, if all sites of disease can be ablated. However, long-term randomized data that test this paradigm are lacking. METHODS We enrolled patients with a controlled primary malignancy and 1-5 metastatic lesions, with all metastases amenable to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). We stratified by the number of metastases (1-3 v 4-5) and randomized in a 1:2 ratio between palliative standard-of-care (SOC) treatments (arm 1) and SOC plus SABR (arm 2). We used a randomized phase II screening design with a primary end point of overall survival (OS), using an α of .20 (wherein P < .20 indicates a positive trial). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). Herein, we present long-term outcomes from the trial. RESULTS Between 2012 and 2016, 99 patients were randomly assigned at 10 centers internationally. The most common primary tumor types were breast (n = 18), lung (n = 18), colorectal (n = 18), and prostate (n = 16). Median follow-up was 51 months. The 5-year OS rate was 17.7% in arm 1 (95% CI, 6% to 34%) versus 42.3% in arm 2 (95% CI, 28% to 56%; stratified log-rank P = .006). The 5-year PFS rate was not reached in arm 1 (3.2%; 95% CI, 0% to 14% at 4 years with last patient censored) and 17.3% in arm 2 (95% CI, 8% to 30%; P = .001). There were no new grade 2-5 adverse events and no differences in QOL between arms. CONCLUSION With extended follow-up, the impact of SABR on OS was larger in magnitude than in the initial analysis and durable over time. There were no new safety signals, and SABR had no detrimental impact on QOL.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis.

            About 50% of cancer patients receive radiation therapy. Here we investigated the hypothesis that tumor response to radiation is determined not only by tumor cell phenotype but also by microvascular sensitivity. MCA/129 fibrosarcomas and B16F1 melanomas grown in apoptosis-resistant acid sphingomyelinase (asmase)-deficient or Bax-deficient mice displayed markedly reduced baseline microvascular endothelial apoptosis and grew 200 to 400% faster than tumors on wild-type microvasculature. Thus, endothelial apoptosis is a homeostatic factor regulating angiogenesis-dependent tumor growth. Moreover, these tumors exhibited reduced endothelial apoptosis upon irradiation and, unlike tumors in wild-type mice, they were resistant to single-dose radiation up to 20 grays (Gy). These studies indicate that microvascular damage regulates tumor cell response to radiation at the clinically relevant dose range.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                17 November 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 1193574
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University , Xiamen, China
                [2] 2 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University , Sapporo, Japan
                [3] 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, National Disaster Medical Center, National Hospital Organization (NHO), Incorporated Administrative Agency 3256 Tachitawa City , Tokyo, Japan
                [4] 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Humanity Hospital Fujian Medical University , Xiamen, China
                [5] 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University , Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
                [6] 6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Emeritus of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, TX, United States
                [7] 7 Department of Sapporo High Functioning Radiotherapy Center, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital , Sapporo, Japan
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sunil Krishnan, Mayo Clinic Florida, United States

                Reviewed by: Giuseppe Roberto D’Agostino, Humanitas Research Hospital, Italy; Mihai Teodor Georgescu, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania

                *Correspondence: Chao Pan, panchao@ 123456xmu.edu.cn ; Ritsuko Komaki, DrKomakiCox@ 123456gmail.com

                †These authors share first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2023.1193574
                10691549
                38045003
                f67a3da6-af03-4013-89ca-3ea0bb4aab6b
                Copyright © 2023 Liao, Kishi, Du, Komaki, Mizoe, Aikawa, Zheng and Pan

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 March 2023
                : 19 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Equations: 1, References: 55, Pages: 11, Words: 3559
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Innovation Project of Fujian Province , doi 10.13039/501100018534;
                This work was supported by grants 2021CXB022 from Medical Innovation Project of Fujian Province of China.
                Categories
                Oncology
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                Radiation Oncology

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                adrenal metastases,sbrt (stereotactic body radiation therapy),fractionation dose,tracking,oligometastases

                Comments

                Comment on this article