99
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tropheryma whipplei, the Agent of Whipple's Disease, Affects the Early to Late Phagosome Transition and Survives in a Rab5- and Rab7-Positive Compartment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tropheryma whipplei, the agent of Whipple's disease, inhibits phago-lysosome biogenesis to create a suitable niche for its survival and replication in macrophages. To understand the mechanism by which it subverts phagosome maturation, we used biochemical and cell biological approaches to purify and characterise the intracellular compartment where Tropheryma whipplei resides using mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophages. We showed that in addition to Lamp-1, the Tropheryma whipplei phagosome is positive for Rab5 and Rab7, two GTPases required for the early to late phagosome transition. Unlike other pathogens, inhibition of PI(3)P production was not the mechanism for Rab5 stabilisation at the phagosome. Overexpression of the inactive, GDP-bound form of Rab5 bypassed the pathogen-induced blockade of phago-lysosome biogenesis. This suggests that Tropheryma whipplei blocks the switch from Rab5 to Rab7 by acting on the Rab5 GTPase cycle. A bio-informatic analysis of the Tropheryma whipplei genome revealed a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) homologous with the GAPDH of Listeria monocytogenes, and this may be the bacterial protein responsible for blocking Rab5 activity. To our knowledge, Tropheryma whipplei is the first pathogen described to induce a “chimeric” phagosome stably expressing both Rab5 and Rab7, suggesting a novel and specific mechanism for subverting phagosome maturation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phagosome maturation: going through the acid test.

          Phagosome maturation is the process by which internalized particles (such as bacteria and apoptotic cells) are trafficked into a series of increasingly acidified membrane-bound structures, leading to particle degradation. The characterization of the phagosomal proteome and studies in model organisms and mammals have led to the identification of numerous candidate proteins that cooperate to control the maturation of phagosomes containing different particles. A subset of these candidate proteins makes up the first pathway to be identified for the maturation of apoptotic cell-containing phagosomes. This suggests that a machinery that is distinct from receptor-mediated endocytosis is used in phagosome maturation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Rab5 effectors in phagosomal biogenesis and mycobacterial phagosome maturation arrest

            Phagosomal biogenesis is a fundamental biological process of particular significance for the function of phagocytic and antigen-presenting cells. The precise mechanisms governing maturation of phagosomes into phagolysosomes are not completely understood. Here, we applied the property of pathogenic mycobacteria to cause phagosome maturation arrest in infected macrophages as a tool to dissect critical steps in phagosomal biogenesis. We report the requirement for 3-phosphoinositides and acquisition of Rab5 effector early endosome autoantigen (EEA1) as essential molecular events necessary for phagosomal maturation. Unlike the model phagosomes containing latex beads, which transiently recruited EEA1, mycobacterial phagosomes excluded this regulator of vesicular trafficking that controls membrane tethering and fusion processes within the endosomal pathway and is recruited to endosomal membranes via binding to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns[3]P). Inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3′(OH)-kinase (PI-3K) activity diminished EEA1 recruitment to newly formed latex bead phagosomes and blocked phagosomal acquisition of late endocytic properties, indicating that generation of PtdIns(3)P plays a role in phagosomal maturation. Microinjection into macrophages of antibodies against EEA1 and the PI-3K hVPS34 reduced acquisition of late endocytic markers by latex bead phagosomes, demonstrating an essential role of these Rab5 effectors in phagosomal biogenesis. The mechanism of EEA1 exclusion from mycobacterial phagosomes was investigated using mycobacterial products. Coating of latex beads with the major mycobacterial cell envelope glycosylated phosphatidylinositol lipoarabinomannan isolated from the virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, inhibited recruitment of EEA1 to latex bead phagosomes, and diminished their maturation. These findings define the generation of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and EEA1 recruitment as: (a) important regulatory events in phagosomal maturation and (b) critical molecular targets affected by M. tuberculosis. This study also identifies mycobacterial phosphoinositides as products with specialized toxic properties, interfering with discrete trafficking stages in phagosomal maturation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Arrest of mycobacterial phagosome maturation is caused by a block in vesicle fusion between stages controlled by rab5 and rab7.

              Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the closely related organism Mycobacterium bovis can survive and replicate inside macrophages. Intracellular survival is at least in part attributed to the failure of mycobacterial phagosomes to undergo fusion with lysosomes. The transformation of phagosomes into phagolysosomes involves gradual acquisition of markers from the endosomal compartment. Members of the rab family of small GTPases which confer fusion competence in the endocytic pathway are exchanged sequentially onto the phagosomal membranes in the course of their maturation. To identify the step at which the fusion capability of phagosomes containing mycobacteria is compromised, we purified green fluorescent protein-labeled M. bovis BCG phagosomal compartments (MPC) and compared GTP-binding protein profiles of these vesicles with latex bead phagosomal compartments (LBC). We report that the MPC do not acquire rab7, specific for late endosomes, even 7 days postinfection, whereas this GTP-binding protein is present on the LBC within hours after phagocytosis. By contrast, rab5 is retained and enriched with time on the MPC, suggesting fusion competence with an early endosomal compartment. Prior infection of macrophages with M. bovis BCG also affected the dynamics of rab5 and rab7 acquisition by subsequently formed LBC. Selective exclusion of rab7, coupled with the retention of rab5 on the mycobacterial phagosome, may allow organisms from the M. tuberculosis complex to avert the usual physiological destination of phagocytosed material.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                24 February 2014
                : 9
                : 2
                : e89367
                Affiliations
                [1 ]UMR MD2, Aix-Marseille University and IRBA, Bd P Dramard, Marseille, France
                [2 ]Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
                [3 ]CNRS UMR 7278, IRD198, INSERM U1095, UM63, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                [4 ]INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, UM105, CRCM-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                UPR 3212 CNRS -Université de Strasbourg, France
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: EG JLM GM PS. Performed the experiments: NB GM AOB VT. Analyzed the data: EG JLM GM PS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EG JLM GM PS VT NB. Wrote the paper: EG JLM GM.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-49989
                10.1371/journal.pone.0089367
                3933534
                f660da7f-645d-41b2-a2f7-ab62ec557016
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 November 2013
                : 20 January 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                This work was supported by the Agence National de la Recherche (ANR, ANR-Microbiology 05-MIIM-043-01), the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and POR Campania FSE 2007-2013 (Project CREME). NB was a fellow of the French Research Ministry. AOB was a fellow of the Scientific Cooperation Foundation ‘Infectiopole Sud’. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Immunology
                Immunity
                Immunity to infections
                Immunologic techniques
                Immunofluorescence
                Microbiology
                Bacterial pathogens
                Host-pathogen interaction
                Molecular cell biology
                Cellular structures
                Subcellular organelles
                Membranes and sorting
                Medicine
                Clinical immunology
                Immunity
                Immunity to infections

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article