27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Male-Specific Fruitless Isoforms Target Neurodevelopmental Genes to Specify a Sexually Dimorphic Nervous System

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          In Drosophila, male courtship behavior is regulated in large part by the gene fruitless ( fru). fru encodes a set of putative transcription factors that promote male sexual behavior by controlling the development of sexually dimorphic neuronal circuitry. Little is known about how Fru proteins function at the level of transcriptional regulation or the role that isoform diversity plays in the formation of a male-specific nervous system.

          Results

          To characterize the roles of sex-specific Fru isoforms in specifying male behavior, we generated novel isoform-specific mutants and used a genomic approach to identify direct Fru isoform targets during development. We demonstrate that all Fru isoforms directly target genes involved in the development of the nervous system, with individual isoforms exhibiting unique binding specificities. We observe that fru behavioral phenotypes are specified by either a single isoform or a combination of isoforms. Finally, we illustrate the utility of these data for the identification of novel sexually dimorphic genomic enhancers and novel downstream regulators of male sexual behavior.

          Conclusions

          These findings suggest that Fru isoform diversity facilitates both redundancy and specificity in gene expression, and that the regulation of neuronal developmental genes may be the most ancient and conserved role of fru in the specification of a male-specific nervous system.

          Highlights

          • Isoform-specific fru mutants reveal both functional redundancy and specificity

          • Fru isoform-specific genomic occupancy is characterized in the Drosophila nervous system

          • All Fru isoforms directly target neuronal morphogenesis genes

          • Isoform-specific motifs are associated with specific Fru isoform occupancy

          Abstract

          Neville et al. characterize the roles of sex-specific Fruitless isoforms in specifying male behavior in Drosophila by generating novel isoform-specific mutants, along with using a genomic approach to identify direct Fruitless isoform targets during development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease.

          FlyAtlas, a new online resource, provides the most comprehensive view yet of expression in multiple tissues of Drosophila melanogaster. Meta-analysis of the data shows that a significant fraction of the genome is expressed with great tissue specificity in the adult, demonstrating the need for the functional genomic community to embrace a wide range of functional phenotypes. Well-known developmental genes are often reused in surprising tissues in the adult, suggesting new functions. The homologs of many human genetic disease loci show selective expression in the Drosophila tissues analogous to the affected human tissues, providing a useful filter for potential candidate genes. Additionally, the contributions of each tissue to the whole-fly array signal can be calculated, demonstrating the limitations of whole-organism approaches to functional genomics and allowing modeling of a simple tissue fractionation procedure that should improve detection of weak or tissue-specific signals.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alternative splicing: increasing diversity in the proteomic world.

            How can the genome of Drosophila melanogaster contain fewer genes than the undoubtedly simpler organism Caenorhabditis elegans? The answer must lie within their proteomes. It is becoming clear that alternative splicing has an extremely important role in expanding protein diversity and might therefore partially underlie the apparent discrepancy between gene number and organismal complexity. Alternative splicing can generate more transcripts from a single gene than the number of genes in an entire genome. However, for the vast majority of alternative splicing events, the functional significance is unknown. Developing a full catalog of alternatively spliced transcripts and determining each of their functions will be a major challenge of the upcoming proteomic era.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evolution of the protein repertoire.

              Most proteins have been formed by gene duplication, recombination, and divergence. Proteins of known structure can be matched to about 50% of genome sequences, and these data provide a quantitative description and can suggest hypotheses about the origins of these processes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Curr. Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                03 February 2014
                03 February 2014
                : 24
                : 3
                : 229-241
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK
                [2 ]Centre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK
                [3 ]The Gurdon Institute and Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK
                [4 ]Laboratory of Computational Biology, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [5 ]Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
                [6 ]Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author megan.goodwin@ 123456dpag.ox.ac.uk
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author stephen.goodwin@ 123456dpag.ox.ac.uk
                Article
                S0960-9822(13)01454-1
                10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.035
                3969260
                24440396
                f6013aa3-4a0c-4edd-993a-99cd984abf36
                © 2014 The Authors

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 October 2013
                : 18 November 2013
                : 19 November 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article