24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinician ambulatory electronic health record use

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The COVID-19 pandemic changed clinician electronic health record (EHR) work in a multitude of ways. To evaluate how, we measure ambulatory clinician EHR use in the United States throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Materials and Methods

          We use EHR meta-data from ambulatory care clinicians in 366 health systems using the Epic EHR system in the United States from December 2019 to December 2020. We used descriptive statistics for clinician EHR use including active-use time across clinical activities, time after-hours, and messages received. Multivariable regression to evaluate total and after-hours EHR work adjusting for daily volume and organizational characteristics, and to evaluate the association between messages and EHR time.

          Results

          Clinician time spent in the EHR per day dropped at the onset of the pandemic but had recovered to higher than prepandemic levels by July 2020. Time spent actively working in the EHR after-hours showed similar trends. These differences persisted in multivariable models. In-Basket messages received increased compared with prepandemic levels, with the largest increase coming from messages from patients, which increased to 157% of the prepandemic average. Each additional patient message was associated with a 2.32-min increase in EHR time per day ( P < .001).

          Discussion

          Clinicians spent more total and after-hours time in the EHR in the latter half of 2020 compared with the prepandemic period. This was partially driven by increased time in Clinical Review and In-Basket messaging.

          Conclusions

          Reimbursement models and workflows for the post-COVID era should account for these demands on clinician time that occur outside the traditional visit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Telehealth Transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of Virtual Care

            Abstract The novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered our economy, society and healthcare system. While this crisis has presented the US healthcare delivery system with unprecedented challenges, the pandemic has catalyzed rapid adoption of telehealth or the entire spectrum of activities used to deliver care at a distance. Using examples reported by US healthcare organizations including ours, we describe the role telehealth has played in transforming healthcare delivery during the three phases of the US COVID-19 pandemic: 1) Stay-at-Home Outpatient Care; 2) Initial COVID-19 Hospital Surge, and 3) Post-Pandemic Recovery. Within each of these three phases, we examine how people, process and technology work together to support a successful telehealth transformation. Whether healthcare enterprises are ready or not, the new reality is that virtual care has arrived.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions

              Physician burnout, a work-related syndrome involving emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and a sense of reduced personal accomplishment, is prevalent internationally. Rates of burnout symptoms that have been associated with adverse effects on patients, the healthcare workforce, costs and physician health exceed 50% in studies of both physicians-in-training and practicing physicians. This problem represents a public health crisis with negative impacts on individual physicians, patients and healthcare organizations and systems. Drivers of this epidemic are largely rooted within healthcare organizations and systems and include excessive workloads, inefficient work processes, clerical burdens, work-home conflicts, lack of input or control for physicians with respect to issues affecting their work lives, organizational support structures and leadership culture. Individual physician-level factors also play a role, with higher rates of burnout commonly reported in female and younger physicians. Effective solutions align with these drivers. For example, organizational efforts such as locally developed practice modifications and increased support for clinical work have demonstrated benefits in reducing burnout. Individually focused solutions such as mindfulness-based stress reduction and small-group programmes to promote community, connectedness and meaning have also been shown to be effective. Regardless of the specific approach taken, the problem of physician burnout is best addressed when viewed as a shared responsibility of both healthcare systems and individual physicians. Although our understanding of physician burnout has advanced considerably in recent years, many gaps in our knowledge remain. Longitudinal studies of burnout's effects and the impact of interventions on both burnout and its effects are needed, as are studies of effective solutions implemented in combination. For medicine to fulfil its mission for patients and for public health, all stakeholders in healthcare delivery must work together to develop and implement effective remedies for physician burnout.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Am Med Inform Assoc
                J Am Med Inform Assoc
                jamia
                Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
                Oxford University Press
                1067-5027
                1527-974X
                09 December 2021
                09 December 2021
                : ocab268
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA
                [2 ] Department of Medicine, Stanford University , Palo Alto, California, USA
                [3 ] Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
                [4 ] Harvard Business School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: A. Jay Holmgren, PhD, Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, University of California San Francisco, 10 Koret Way, Office 327A, San Francisco, CA 94131, USA ( a.holmgren@ 123456ucsf.edu )
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-6393
                Article
                ocab268
                10.1093/jamia/ocab268
                8689796
                34888680
                f5abb630-0d08-44e5-a43b-745118e2d924
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

                This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                : 11 October 2021
                : 08 November 2021
                : 15 November 2021
                : 17 November 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                Research and Applications
                AcademicSubjects/MED00580
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01060
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01530
                Custom metadata
                PAP

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                covid-19,electronic health record,clinician well-being

                Comments

                Comment on this article