13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gender diversity in UK surgical specialties: a national observational study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To compare gender diversity between UK surgical specialties, assess trends over time, and estimate when gender parity might be achieved.

          Design

          Observational study.

          Setting

          National Health Service, UK.

          Participants

          NHS Hospital & Community Health Service workforce statistics for 2011 to 2020

          Main outcome measures

          Logistic regression was used to compare female representation in 2020 between surgical specialties, and to examine for any significant trends between 2011 and 2020. The method of least squares was used to estimate when female representation of specialty registrars would reach 50% (‘gender parity’) for specialties with <40% female representation.

          Results

          In 2020, female consultant and specialty registrar representation was significantly different between surgical specialties (both p<0.001). Female representation for each specialty were as follows (from highest to lowest): Specialty Registrars—Ophthalmology 49.7%, Otolaryngology 48.2%, Paediatric Surgery 45.5%, Plastic Surgery 42.2%, General Surgery 39.8%, Urology 31.6%, Vascular Surgery 25.0%, Neurosurgery 24.7%, Cardiothoracic Surgery 21.3%, and Trauma and Orthopaedics 20.6%; Consultants—Ophthalmology 32.4%, Paediatric Surgery 31.7%, Plastic Surgery 20.9%, General Surgery 17.5%, Otolaryngology 17%, Vascular Surgery 13.7%, Urology 11.7%, Cardiothoracic Surgery 10.8%, Neurosurgery 8.2%, and Trauma and Orthopaedics 7.3%. There was a significant positive trend in female representation of specialty registrars between 2011 and 2020 for all specialties except for Paediatric Surgery (representation consistently >45%) and Vascular Surgery (representation consistently <30%). General Surgery was estimated to achieve gender parity of their specialty registrars by 2028, Urology by 2033, Neurosurgery by 2064, Trauma and Orthopaedics by 2070, and Cardiothoracic Surgery by 2082.

          Conclusions

          Despite improvements over the last decade, gender disparity persists in the UK surgical workforce and there are significant differences between surgical specialties. Further work is necessary to establish the reasons for these observed differences with a specific focus on Vascular Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Trauma and Orthopaedics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Diversity improves performance and outcomes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence and Causes of Attrition Among Surgical Residents

            Attrition of residents from general surgery training programs is relatively high; however, there are wide discrepancies in the prevalence and causes of attrition reported among surgical residents in previous studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why do women leave surgical training? A qualitative and feminist study

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                20 January 2022
                : 12
                : 2
                : e055516
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Urology , Kings College Hospital , London, London, UK
                [2 ] London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Department of Health Services Research and Policy , London, London, UK
                [3 ] Whittington Hospital , London, London, UK
                [4 ] UCL Division of Medicine , London, London, UK
                [5 ] Kent Surrey and Sussex Deanery , Crawley, West Sussex, UK
                [6 ] Royal College of Surgeons of England , London, London, UK
                [7 ] departmentUrological Department , Barts Health NHS Trust , London, London, UK
                [8 ] departmentCardiothoracic surgery , Morriston Hospital , Swansea, Wales, UK
                [9 ] departmentDepartment of Vascular and General Surgery , Croydon Health Services NHS Trust , Croydon, Greater London, UK
                [10 ] departmentUrology , Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust , London, UK
                [11 ] departmentHealth Service and Population Research Department , Center for Implementation Science, King’s College London , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Mr Thomas Hedley Newman; thomas.newman1@ 123456nhs.net
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1668-3315
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-055516
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055516
                8968535
                35314455
                f57dc244-5e50-43f0-b612-593548517cc1
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 July 2021
                : 10 December 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Ms Janet Tomlinson (Private Donor);
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Surgery
                1506
                1612
                1737
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked
                press-release
                press-release

                Medicine
                surgery,organisation of health services,medical education & training,human resource management

                Comments

                Comment on this article