38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pertrochanteric fracture of the femur in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register: validity of procedural coding, external cause for injury and diagnosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Hospital discharge data is routinely collected in Finland and it is an invaluable source of information when assessing injury epidemiology as well as treatment. The database can be used when planning injury prevention and redirecting resources of the health care system. Most recently our hospital discharge register has been used to assess the incidence of surgical treatment of common fractures. This study was aimed to evaluate the coverage and accuracy of the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register (NHDR) focusing on hip fractures. In other words, patients hospitalized for a pertrochanteric hip fracture were used to assess the validity of the NHDR.

          Methods

          The validity of the NHDR was assessed by comparing the data in hospital discharge register with the original patient records and radiographs in three separate hospitals; Tampere University Hospital, Hatanpää City Hospital of Tampere, and the Central Hospital of Kanta-Häme. The study analysis included 741 patients hospitalized due to pertrochanteric hip fracture between 1 st January 2008 and 31 st December 2010.

          Results

          The diagnosis was correctly placed on 96% (95% CI: 94 to 97%) of the 741 patients when radiographs were used as golden standard. The procedural coding had coverage of 98% (95% CI: 96 to 98%) and an accuracy of 88% (95% CI: 85 to 90%). The coverage of the external cause for injury was found to be 95% (95% CI: 94 to 97%) with an accuracy of 90% (95% CI: 87 to 92%).

          Conclusions

          Our results show that the validity of the Finnish NHDR is excellent as determined by accuracy of diagnosis and both accuracy and coverage of procedural coding and external cause for injury. The database can be used to assess injury epidemiology and changes in surgical treatment protocols.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Association of timing of surgery for hip fracture and patient outcomes.

          Previous studies of surgical timing in patients with hip fracture have yielded conflicting findings on mortality and have not focused on functional outcomes. To examine the association of timing of surgical repair of hip fracture with function and other outcomes. Prospective cohort study including analyses matching cases of early ( 24 hours) surgery with propensity scores and excluding patients who might not be candidates for early surgery. Four hospitals in the New York City metropolitan area. A total of 1206 patients aged 50 years or older admitted with hip fracture over 29 months, ending December 1999. Function (using the Functional Independence Measure), survival, pain, and length of stay (LOS). Of the patients treated with surgery (n = 1178), 33.8% had surgery within 24 hours. Earlier surgery was not associated with improved mortality (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.08) or improved locomotion (difference of -0.04 points; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.39). Earlier surgery was associated with fewer days of severe and very severe pain (difference of -0.22 days; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.03) and shorter LOS by 1.94 days (P<.001), but postoperative pain and LOS after surgery did not differ. Analyses with propensity scores yielded similar results. When the cohort included only patients who were medically stable at admission and therefore eligible for early surgery, the results were unchanged except that early surgery was associated with fewer major complications (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.95). Early surgery was not associated with improved function or mortality, but it was associated with reduced pain and LOS and probably major complications among patients medically stable at admission. Additional research is needed on whether functional outcomes may be improved. In the meantime, patients with hip fracture who are medically stable should receive early surgery when possible.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Trends in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures – a nationwide 23-year study in Finland

            Background Proximal humeral fractures are common osteoporotic fractures. Most proximal humeral fractures are treated non-surgically, although surgical treatment has gained popularity. The purpose of this study was to determine changes in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures in Finland between 1987 and 2009. Methods The study covered the entire adult (>19 y) population in Finland over the 23-year period from 1st of January 1987 to 31st of December 2009. We assessed the number and incidence of surgically treated proximal humeral fractures in each year of observation and recorded the type of surgery used. The cohort study was based on data from Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register. Results During the 23-year study period, a total of 10,560 surgical operations for proximal humeral fractures were performed in Finland. The overall incidence of these operations nearly quadrupled between 1987 and 2009. After the year 2002, the number of patients treated with plating increased. Conclusion An increase in the incidence of the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures was seen in Finland in 1987–2009. Fracture plating became increasingly popular since 2002. As optimal indications for each surgical treatment modality in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures are not known, critical evaluation of each individual treatment method is needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Incidence of fall-related traumatic brain injuries among older Finnish adults between 1970 and 2011.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central
                1471-2474
                2014
                24 March 2014
                : 15
                : 98
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesia, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
                [2 ]Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
                [3 ]UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Injury & Osteoporosis Research Center, Tampere, Finland
                [4 ]Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
                [5 ]Division of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland
                [6 ]University of Tampere, Seinäjoki, Finland
                [7 ]Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [8 ]Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [9 ]Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
                [10 ]Simppoonkatu 5 B 8, FIN-33230 Tampere, Finland
                Article
                1471-2474-15-98
                10.1186/1471-2474-15-98
                4026595
                24655318
                f51a2a29-bc24-4874-9626-813675cd0fad
                Copyright © 2014 Huttunen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 6 November 2013
                : 11 March 2014
                Categories
                Research Article

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article