28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of oral clodronate on bone mass, bone turnover and subsequent metastases in women with primary breast cancer

      , , , ,
      European Journal of Cancer
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Breast cancer treatments have been associated with accelerated bone loss and increased osteoporosis risk. In a subgroup analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we compared the changes in spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in women with primary breast cancer who had received standard therapy plus either oral clodronate 1600 mg/d (n=419) or placebo (n=432) for 2 years. After 2 years, spine BMD was 1.92% higher in patients who received clodronate instead of placebo (P<0.0001) and total hip BMD was 1.29% higher (P=0.002 versus placebo). Patients who received clodronate had a median 26% reduction in levels of serum N-terminal pro-peptide of type I procollagen (PINP)--a marker of bone turnover--after 2 years of therapy. This compares with a median 5% increase in patients who received placebo (P<0.0001). Effects on BMD, but not biochemical markers, persisted for up to 3 years post-treatment. Early changes in PINP were associated with changes in BMD and the likelihood of developing bone metastases. This study shows the use of oral clodronate during primary breast cancer treatment is associated with reduced bone turnover and protection against bone metastases.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          European Journal of Cancer
          European Journal of Cancer
          Elsevier BV
          09598049
          February 2010
          February 2010
          : 46
          : 3
          : 558-565
          Article
          10.1016/j.ejca.2009.12.003
          20031392
          f511926c-4d69-4c51-9b85-4e91b9232205
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article