0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      From microbial communities to aroma profiles: A comparative study of spontaneous fermentation in merlot and cabernet sauvignon wines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to compare the microbial community composition and aroma characteristics during the fermentation of different grape cultivars, Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon. Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), and Odor Activity Value (OAV) screening identified 15 distinct active compounds. The sensory evaluation indicated that Merlot wine exhibited a more intense fruity aroma and received higher overall scores than Cabernet Sauvignon wine. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) results revealed that the microbial diversity in Merlot was higher than in Cabernet Sauvignon wine. Lachancea, Acremonium, Fructobacillus, and Lactiplantibacillus were unique to the Merlot wine, whereas Penicillium, Wickerhamomyces, Gluconobacter, and Klebsiella were exclusive to Cabernet Sauvignon wine. Saccharomyces and Tatumella were identified as the dominant microorganisms during the fermentation of both Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon wines. Correlation analysis demonstrated a significant positive association among the dominant microbial communities, which played a crucial role in determining the formation of volatile compounds.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Grape cultivars play a crucial role in shaping wine characteristics.

          • 15 differential aroma compounds identified between Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon wine.

          • Merlot wine exhibited a more intense fruity aroma than Cabernet Sauvignon wine.

          • Significant microbial community differences between two grape cultivars.

          • Dominant fungi and bacteria during fermentation showed a synergistic interaction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate.

          Wine grapes present a unique biogeography model, wherein microbial biodiversity patterns across viticultural zones not only answer questions of dispersal and community maintenance, they are also an inherent component of the quality, consumer acceptance, and economic appreciation of a culturally important food product. On their journey from the vineyard to the wine bottle, grapes are transformed to wine through microbial activity, with indisputable consequences for wine quality parameters. Wine grapes harbor a wide range of microbes originating from the surrounding environment, many of which are recognized for their role in grapevine health and wine quality. However, determinants of regional wine characteristics have not been identified, but are frequently assumed to stem from viticultural or geological factors alone. This study used a high-throughput, short-amplicon sequencing approach to demonstrate that regional, site-specific, and grape-variety factors shape the fungal and bacterial consortia inhabiting wine-grape surfaces. Furthermore, these microbial assemblages are correlated to specific climatic features, suggesting a link between vineyard environmental conditions and microbial inhabitation patterns. Taken together, these factors shape the unique microbial inputs to regional wine fermentations, posing the existence of nonrandom "microbial terroir" as a determining factor in regional variation among wine grapes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The microbial ecology of wine grape berries.

            Grapes have a complex microbial ecology including filamentous fungi, yeasts and bacteria with different physiological characteristics and effects upon wine production. Some species are only found in grapes, such as parasitic fungi and environmental bacteria, while others have the ability to survive and grow in wines, constituting the wine microbial consortium. This consortium covers yeast species, lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid bacteria. The proportion of these microorganisms depends on the grape ripening stage and on the availability of nutrients. Grape berries are susceptible to fungal parasites until véraison after which the microbiota of truly intact berries is similar to that of plant leaves, which is dominated by basidiomycetous yeasts (e.g. Cryptococcus spp., Rhodotorula spp. Sporobolomyces spp.) and the yeast-like fungus Aureobasidium pullulans. The cuticle of visually intact berries may bear microfissures and softens with ripening, increasing nutrient availability and explaining the possible dominance by the oxidative or weakly fermentative ascomycetous populations (e.g. Candida spp., Hanseniaspora spp., Metschnikowia spp., Pichia spp.) approaching harvest time. When grape skin is clearly damaged, the availability of high sugar concentrations on the berry surface favours the increase of ascomycetes with higher fermentative activity like Pichia spp. and Zygoascus hellenicus, including dangerous wine spoilage yeasts (e.g. Zygosaccharomyces spp., Torulaspora spp.), and of acetic acid bacteria (e.g. Gluconobacter spp., Acetobacter spp.). The sugar fermenting species Saccharomyces cerevisiae is rarely found on unblemished berries, being favoured by grape damage. Lactic acid bacteria are minor partners of grape microbiota and while being the typical agent of malolactic fermentation, Oenococcus oeni has been seldom isolated from grapes in the vineyard. Environmental ubiquitous bacteria of the genus Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Burkholderia spp., Serratia spp., Staphylococcus spp., among others, have been isolated from grapes but do not have the ability to grow in wines. Saprophytic moulds, like Botrytis cinerea, causing grey rot, or Aspergillus spp., possibly producing ochratoxin, are only active in the vineyard, although their metabolites may affect wine quality during grape processing. The impact of damaged grapes in yeast ecology has been underestimated mostly because of inaccurate grape sampling. Injured berries hidden in apparently sound bunches explain the recovery of a higher number of species when whole bunches are picked. Grape health status is the main factor affecting the microbial ecology of grapes, increasing both microbial numbers and species diversity. Therefore, the influence of abiotic (e.g. climate, rain, hail), biotic (e.g. insects, birds, phytopathogenic and saprophytic moulds) and viticultural (e.g. fungicides) factors is dependent on their primary damaging effect. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast.

              Understanding the conditions that promote the maintenance of cooperation is a classic problem in evolutionary biology. The essence of this dilemma is captured by the 'tragedy of the commons': how can a group of individuals that exploit resources in a cooperative manner resist invasion by 'cheaters' who selfishly use common resources to maximize their individual reproduction at the expense of the group? Here, we investigate this conflict through experimental competitions between isogenic cheater and cooperator strains of yeast with alternative pathways of glucose metabolism, and by using mathematical models of microbial biochemistry. We show that both coexistence and competitive exclusion are possible outcomes of this conflict, depending on the spatial and temporal structure of the environment. Both of these outcomes are driven by trade-offs between the rate and efficiency of conversion of resources into offspring that are mediated by metabolic intermediates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Food Chem X
                Food Chem X
                Food Chemistry: X
                Elsevier
                2590-1575
                25 February 2025
                February 2025
                25 February 2025
                : 26
                : 102317
                Affiliations
                College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. wangjing@ 123456gsau.edu.cn
                Article
                S2590-1575(25)00164-6 102317
                10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102317
                11923755
                40115500
                f4fd5390-a372-450a-9e8a-c2ac107effc4
                © 2025 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 January 2025
                : 18 February 2025
                : 22 February 2025
                Categories
                Research Article

                different cultivars,wine microbiome,spontaneous fermentation,volatile aromas,wine terroir,ethyl acetate (pubchem cid176),isobutyl acetate (pubchem cid8038),ethyl caprylate (pubchem cid7799),ethyl caprate (pubchem cid8048),ethyl hexanoate (pubchem cid31265),3-methyl-1-butanol (pubchem cid31260),phenethyl alcohol (pubchem cid6054),linalool (pubchem cid6549)

                Comments

                Comment on this article