13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Masked Speech Perception in Infants, Children and Adults

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 2
      Ear and hearing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The primary goal of this study was to compare infants' susceptibility to making produced by a two-talker speech and a speech-shaped noise masker. It is well documented that school-age children experience more difficulty recognizing speech embedded in two-talker speech than spectrally matched noise, a result attributed to immaturity in the ability to segregate target from masker speech, and/or to selectively attend to the target while disregarding the perceptually similar speech masker. However, findings from infant psychophysical studies suggest that infants are susceptible to auditory masking even when target and competing sounds are acoustically distinct.

          Design

          Listeners were infants (8-10 mos), children (8-10 yrs) and adults (18-33 yrs). The task was an observer-based, single-interval disyllabic word detection, in the presence of either a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. The masker played continuously at 55 dB SPL, and the target level was adapted to estimate threshold.

          Results

          As observed previously for closed-set consonant and word identification as well as open-set word and sentence recognition, school-age children experienced relatively more masking than adults in the two-talker than the speech-shaped noise masker. The novel result of this study was that infants' speech detection thresholds were about 24 dB higher than those of adults in both maskers. While response bias differed between listener groups, it did not differ reliably between maskers.

          Conclusions

          It is often assumed that speech perception in a speech masker places greater demands on a listener's ability to segregate and selectively attend to the target than a noise masker. This assumption is based on results showing larger child/adult differences for speech perception in a speech masker composed of a small number of talkers than in spectrally matched noise. The observation that infants experience equal masking for speech and noise maskers suggests that infants experience informational masking in both maskers and raises the possibility that the cues which make the steady noise a relatively ineffective masker for children are learned.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8005585
          3404
          Ear Hear
          Ear Hear
          Ear and hearing
          0196-0202
          1538-4667
          4 January 2016
          May-Jun 2016
          01 May 2017
          : 37
          : 3
          : 345-353
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA
          [2 ]Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
          Author notes
          Address correspondence to Lori J. Leibold, Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30 th Street, Omaha, NE, USA. lori.leibold@ 123456boystown.org
          Article
          PMC4844837 PMC4844837 4844837 nihpa744741
          10.1097/AUD.0000000000000270
          4844837
          26783855
          f4f8e781-5a0e-4be5-86be-f3a18deca656
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article