9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is a potentially severe complication of therapeutic colonoscopy which can result in hospital readmission and re-intervention. Over the last decade, rates of DPPB reported in the literature have fallen from over 2% to 0.3–1.2%, largely due to improvements in resection technique, a shift towards cold snare polypectomy, better training, adherence to guidelines on periprocedural antithrombotic management, and the use of antithrombotics with more favourable bleeding profiles. However, as the complexity of polypectomy undertaken worldwide increases, so does the importance of identifying patients at increased risk of DPPB. Risk factors can be categorised according to patient, polyp and personnel related factors, and their integration together to provide an individualised risk score is an evolving field. Strategies to reduce DPPB include safe practices relevant to all patients undergoing colonoscopy, as well as specific considerations for patients identified to be high risk. This narrative review sets out an evidence-based summary of factors that contribute to the risk of DPPB before discussing pragmatic interventions to mitigate their risk and improve patient safety.

          Related collections

          Most cited references100

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Plasma Hsp90 levels in patients with systemic sclerosis and relation to lung and skin involvement: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

          Our previous study demonstrated increased expression of Heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 in the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). We aimed to evaluate plasma Hsp90 in SSc and characterize its association with SSc-related features. Ninety-two SSc patients and 92 age-/sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for the cross-sectional analysis. The longitudinal analysis comprised 30 patients with SSc associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) routinely treated with cyclophosphamide. Hsp90 was increased in SSc compared to healthy controls. Hsp90 correlated positively with C-reactive protein and negatively with pulmonary function tests: forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). In patients with diffuse cutaneous (dc) SSc, Hsp90 positively correlated with the modified Rodnan skin score. In SSc-ILD patients treated with cyclophosphamide, no differences in Hsp90 were found between baseline and after 1, 6, or 12 months of therapy. However, baseline Hsp90 predicts the 12-month change in DLCO. This study shows that Hsp90 plasma levels are increased in SSc patients compared to age-/sex-matched healthy controls. Elevated Hsp90 in SSc is associated with increased inflammatory activity, worse lung functions, and in dcSSc, with the extent of skin involvement. Baseline plasma Hsp90 predicts the 12-month change in DLCO in SSc-ILD patients treated with cyclophosphamide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population

            New England Journal of Medicine, 360(5), 491-499
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

              1  ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP) as the preferred technique for removal of diminutive polyps (size ≤ 5 mm). This technique has high rates of complete resection, adequate tissue sampling for histology, and low complication rates. (High quality evidence, strong recommendation.)2 ESGE suggests CSP for sessile polyps 6 - 9 mm in size because of its superior safety profile, although evidence comparing efficacy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) is lacking. (Moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation.)3 ESGE suggests HSP (with or without submucosal injection) for removal of sessile polyps 10 - 19 mm in size. In most cases deep thermal injury is a potential risk and thus submucosal injection prior to HSP should be considered. (Low quality evidence, strong recommendation.)4 ESGE recommends HSP for pedunculated polyps. To prevent bleeding in pedunculated colorectal polyps with head ≥ 20 mm or a stalk ≥ 10 mm in diameter, ESGE recommends pretreatment of the stalk with injection of dilute adrenaline and/or mechanical hemostasis. (Moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation.)5 ESGE recommends that the goals of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are to achieve a completely snare-resected lesion in the safest minimum number of pieces, with adequate margins and without need for adjunctive ablative techniques. (Low quality evidence; strong recommendation.)6 ESGE recommends careful lesion assessment prior to EMR to identify features suggestive of poor outcome. Features associated with incomplete resection or recurrence include lesion size > 40 mm, ileocecal valve location, prior failed attempts at resection, and size, morphology, site, and access (SMSA) level 4. (Moderate quality evidence; strong recommendation.)7 For intraprocedural bleeding, ESGE recommends endoscopic coagulation (snare-tip soft coagulation or coagulating forceps) or mechanical therapy, with or without the combined use of dilute adrenaline injection. (Low quality evidence, strong recommendation.)An algorithm of polypectomy recommendations according to shape and size of polyps is given (Fig. 1).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Exp Gastroenterol
                Clin Exp Gastroenterol
                ceg
                Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
                Dove
                1178-7023
                24 December 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 477-492
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust , Truro, UK
                [2 ]Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Ministry of Interior and Administration , Szczecin, Poland
                [3 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Dudley, UK
                [4 ]Medicine, Birmingham City Hospital , Birmingham, UK
                [5 ]Austin Gastroenterology , Austin, TX, USA
                [6 ]Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital , London, UK
                [7 ]School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle , Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
                [8 ]Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights , New South Wales, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Keith Siau Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust , Truro, TR1 3LJ, UK Email keithsiau@nhs.net
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0771-1177
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9511-7380
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-9561
                Article
                282699
                10.2147/CEG.S282699
                8714413
                34992406
                f4a37855-c830-4b41-aa6f-dbb16ee75b50
                © 2021 Bendall et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 12 October 2021
                : 02 December 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, References: 100, Pages: 16
                Categories
                Review

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                colonoscopy,polypectomy,haemorrhage,adverse event,complications
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                colonoscopy, polypectomy, haemorrhage, adverse event, complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article