13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Penalised complexity priors for stationary autoregressive processes

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The autoregressive process of order \(p\) (AR(\(p\))) is a central model in time series analysis. A Bayesian approach requires the user to define a prior distribution for the coefficients of the AR(\(p\)) model. Although it is easy to write down some prior, it is not at all obvious how to understand and interpret the prior, to ensure that it behaves according to the users prior knowledge. In this paper, we approach this problem using the recently developed ideas of penalised complexity (PC) priors. These priors have important properties like robustness and invariance to reparameterisations, as well as a clear interpretation. A PC prior is computed based on specific principles, where model component complexity is penalised in terms of deviation from simple base model formulations. In the AR(1) case, we discuss two natural base model choices, corresponding to either independence in time or no change in time. The latter case is illustrated in a survival model with possible time-dependent frailty. For higher-order processes, we propose a sequential approach, where the base model for AR(\(p\)) is the corresponding AR(\(p-1\)) model expressed using the partial autocorrelations. The properties of the new prior are compared with the reference prior in a simulation study.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          2016-08-31
          Article
          1608.08941
          f4414231-dce2-4564-bd6c-df13fc8e57be

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          14 pages, 3 figures
          stat.ME

          Methodology
          Methodology

          Comments

          Comment on this article