0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Establishment of a Novel Rat Model of Gram-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection Using Cementless Hip Hemiarthroplasty

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Gram-negative periprosthetic joint infections (GN-PJIs) present unique challenges. Our aim was to establish a clinically representative GN-PJI model that recapitulates biofilm formation in vivo. We also hypothesized that biofilm formation on the implant surface would affect its ability to osseointegrate.

          Methods:

          Three-dimensionally-printed medical-grade titanium hip implants were used to replace the femoral heads of male Sprague-Dawley rats. GN-PJI was induced using 2 bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: a reference strain (PA14- lux) and a mutant biofilm-defective strain ( ΔflgK-lux). Infection was monitored in real time using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Bacterial loads were quantified utilizing the viable colony count. Biofilm formation at the bone-implant interface was visualized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Implant stability, as an outcome, was directly assessed by quantifying osseointegration using microcomputed tomography, and indirectly assessed by identifying gait-pattern changes.

          Results:

          Bioluminescence detected by the IVIS was focused on the hip region and demonstrated localized infection, with greater ability of PA14- lux to persist in the model compared with the ΔflgK-lux strain, which is defective in biofilm formation. This was corroborated by MRI, as PA14- lux induced relatively larger implant-related abscesses. Biofilm formation at the bone-implant interface induced by PA14- lux was visualized using FE-SEM versus defective-biofilm formation by ΔflgK-lux. Quantitatively, the average viable colony count of the sonicated implants, in colony-forming units/mL, was 3.77 × 10 8 for PA14- lux versus 3.65 × 10 3 for ΔflgK-lux, with a 95% confidence interval around the difference of 1.45 × 10 8 to 6.08 × 10 8 (p = 0.0025). This difference in the ability to persist in the model was reflected significantly on implant osseointegration, with a mean intersection surface of 4.1 × 10 6 ± 1.99 × 10 6 μm 2 for PA14- lux versus 6.44 × 10 6 ± 2.53 × 10 6 μm 2 for ΔflgK-lux and 7.08 × 10 6 ± 1.55 × 10 6 μm 2 for the noninfected control (p = 0.048).

          Conclusions:

          To our knowledge, this proposed, novel in vivo biofilm-based model is the most clinically representative for GN-PJI to date, since animals can bear weight on the implant, poor osseointegration was associated with biofilm formation, and localized PJI was assessed by various modalities.

          Clinical Relevance:

          This model will allow for more reliable testing of novel biofilm-targeting therapeutics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The biofilm matrix.

            The microorganisms in biofilms live in a self-produced matrix of hydrated extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that form their immediate environment. EPS are mainly polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids and lipids; they provide the mechanical stability of biofilms, mediate their adhesion to surfaces and form a cohesive, three-dimensional polymer network that interconnects and transiently immobilizes biofilm cells. In addition, the biofilm matrix acts as an external digestive system by keeping extracellular enzymes close to the cells, enabling them to metabolize dissolved, colloidal and solid biopolymers. Here we describe the functions, properties and constituents of the EPS matrix that make biofilms the most successful forms of life on earth.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0021-9355
                1535-1386
                2023
                January 4 2023
                November 16 2022
                : 105
                : 1
                : 42-52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
                [5 ]Materials Characterization Core Facility, Centre for Advanced Materials Research (CAMaR), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ]Animal Behavior and Physiology Core, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ]Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
                Article
                10.2106/JBJS.22.00094
                f3f4583d-218e-4faf-bee7-522f9ba2880e
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article