33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using Participatory Learning & Action research to access and engage with ‘hard to reach’ migrants in primary healthcare research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Communication problems occur in general practice consultations when migrants and general practitioners do not share a common language and culture. Migrants’ perspectives have rarely been included in the development of guidelines designed to ameliorate this. Considered ‘hard-to-reach’ on the basis of inaccessibility, language discordance and cultural difference, migrants have been consistently excluded from participation in primary healthcare research. The purpose of this qualitative study was to address this gap.

          Methods

          The study was conducted in the Republic of Ireland, 2009 – 2011. We developed a multi-lingual community-university research team that included seven established migrants from local communities. They completed training in Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) - a qualitative research methodology. Then, as trained service-user peer researchers (SUPERs) they used their access routes, language skills, cultural knowledge and innovative PLA techniques to recruit and engage in research with fifty-one hard-to-reach migrant service-users (MSUs).

          Results & discussion

          In terms of access, university researchers successfully accessed SUPERs, who, in turn, successfully accessed, recruited and retained MSUs in the study. In terms of meaningful engagement, SUPERs facilitated a complex PLA research process in a language-concordant manner, enabling inclusion and active participation by MSUs. This ensured that MSUs’ perspectives were included in the development of a guideline for improving communication between healthcare providers and MSUs in Ireland. SUPERs evaluated their experiences of capacity-building, training, research fieldwork and dissemination as positively meaningful for them. MSUs evaluated their experiences of engagement in PLA fieldwork and research as positively meaningful for them.

          Conclusions

          Given the need to build primary healthcare ‘from the ground up’, the perspectives of diverse groups, especially the hard-to-reach, must become a normative part of primary healthcare research. PLA is a powerful, practical ‘fit-for-purpose’ methodology for achieving this: enabling hard-to-reach groups to engage meaningfully and contribute with ease to academic research. PLA has significant potential to become a ‘standard’ or generic approach in building community-based primary health care. Community–university partnerships have a significant role to play in this, with capacity to radically influence the shape of healthcare research, expanding the research agenda to incorporate the views and needs of hard-to-reach and vulnerable populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice.

            The increasing use of participatory research (PR) approaches to address pressing public health issues reflects PR's potential for bridging gaps between research and practice, addressing social and environmental justice and enabling people to gain control over determinants of their health. Our critical review of the PR literature culminates in the development of an integrative practice framework that features five essential domains and provides a structured process for developing and maintaining PR partnerships, designing and implementing PR efforts, and evaluating the intermediate and long-term outcomes of descriptive, etiological, and intervention PR studies. We review the empirical and nonempirical literature in the context of this practice framework to distill the key challenges and added value of PR. Advances to the practice of PR over the next decade will require establishing the effectiveness of PR in achieving health outcomes and linking PR practices, processes, and core elements to health outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The art of case study research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mary.oreillydebrun@nuigalway.ie
                tomas.debrun@nuigalway.ie
                katyaokonkwo@hotmail.com
                jeansamuel1@hotmail.com
                mariasilva@eircom.net
                olaeghosa2002@yahoo.co.uk
                agaikewa@yahoo.com
                lovina906@gmail.com
                Evelyn.vanWeel-Baumgarten@radboudumc.nl
                chris.vanweel@radboudumc.nl , chris.vanweel@anu.edu.au
                maria.vandenmuijsenbergh@radboudumc.nl
                Anne.macfarlane@ul.ie
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                20 January 2016
                20 January 2016
                2015
                : 16
                : 25
                Affiliations
                [ ]Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
                [ ]Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Pharos, Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
                [ ]Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
                Article
                1247
                10.1186/s12913-015-1247-8
                4721015
                26792057
                f3b408b6-b209-4e93-8feb-51f7df19448a
                © O’Reilly-de Brún et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 6 February 2015
                : 19 December 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Health & Social care
                migrants,user-involvement,meaningful engagement,participatory research,primary healthcare,peer researchers,guidelines

                Comments

                Comment on this article