Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development of informant-report neurobehavioral survey scales for PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome and related neurodevelopmental genetic syndromes.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are few well-validated measures that are appropriate for assessing the full range of neurobehavioral presentations in PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) and other neurodevelopmental genetic syndromes (NDGS). As potential therapeutics are developed, having reliable, valid, free, and easily accessible measures to track a range of neurobehavioral domains will be crucial for future clinical trials. This study focused on the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a set of freely available informant-report survey scales for PHTS-the Neurobehavioral Evaluation Tool (NET). Concept elicitation, quantitative ratings, and cognitive interviewing processes were conducted with stakeholders and clinician-scientist experts, used to identify the most important neurobehavioral domains for this population, and to ensure items were appropriate for the full range of individuals with PHTS. Results of this process identified a PHTS neurobehavioral impact model with 11 domains. The final NET scales assessing these domains were administered to a sample of 384 participants (median completion time = 20.6 min), including 32 people with PHTS, 141 with other NDGS, 47 with idiopathic neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD), and 164 neurotypical controls. Initial psychometric results for the total scores of each scale indicated very good model (ω = 0.83-0.99) and internal consistency reliability (α = 0.82-0.98) as well as excellent test-retest reproducibility at 1-month follow-up (r = 0.78-0.98) and stability at 4-month follow-up (r = 0.76-0.96). Conditional reliability estimates indicated very strong measurement precision in key score ranges for assessing PHTS and other people with NDGS and/or idiopathic NDD. Comparisons across domains between PHTS and the other groups revealed specific patterns of symptoms and functioning, including lower levels of challenging behavior and more developed daily living and executive functioning skills relative to other NDGS. The NET appears to be a reliable and potentially useful tool for clinical characterization and monitoring of neurobehavioral symptoms in PHTS and may also have utility in the assessment of other NDGS and idiopathic NDD. Additional validation work, including convergent and discriminant validity analyses, are needed to replicate and extend these observations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Med Genet A
          American journal of medical genetics. Part A
          Wiley
          1552-4833
          1552-4825
          Jul 2023
          : 191
          : 7
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, John Carroll University, University Heights, Ohio, USA.
          [2 ] Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
          [3 ] Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
          [4 ] Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
          [5 ] Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
          [6 ] Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
          [7 ] Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
          [8 ] Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience Kings College London, London, UK.
          [9 ] Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology Kennedy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
          [10 ] Department of Psychology, Frazier Behavioral Health, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
          [11 ] PTEN Research Foundation, Cheltenham, UK.
          [12 ] PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome Foundation, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
          [13 ] SYNGAP Research Fund, Palo Alto, California, USA.
          [14 ] Malan Syndrome Foundation, Old Bridge, New Jersey, USA.
          [15 ] ADNP Kids Foundation, Brush Prairie, Washington, USA.
          [16 ] Adroit Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
          [17 ] Rosamund Stone Zander Translational Neuroscience Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
          [18 ] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
          [19 ] Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
          Article
          10.1002/ajmg.a.63195
          37045800
          f35307b2-0bea-41fe-8bc8-f58df47d289f
          History

          NFIX,Measure,SYNGAP1,ADNP,Neurobehavioral,PTEN
          NFIX, Measure, SYNGAP1, ADNP, Neurobehavioral, PTEN

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content294

          Cited by3