16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Agricultural Intensification Exacerbates Spillover Effects on Soil Biogeochemistry in Adjacent Forest Remnants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Land-use intensification is a central element in proposed strategies to address global food security. One rationale for accepting the negative consequences of land-use intensification for farmland biodiversity is that it could ‘spare’ further expansion of agriculture into remaining natural habitats. However, in many regions of the world the only natural habitats that can be spared are fragments within landscapes dominated by agriculture. Therefore, land-sparing arguments hinge on land-use intensification having low spillover effects into adjacent protected areas, otherwise net conservation gains will diminish with increasing intensification. We test, for the first time, whether the degree of spillover from farmland into adjacent natural habitats scales in magnitude with increasing land-use intensity. We identified a continuous land-use intensity gradient across pastoral farming systems in New Zealand (based on 13 components of farmer input and soil biogeochemistry variables), and measured cumulative off-site spillover effects of fertilisers and livestock on soil biogeochemistry in 21 adjacent forest remnants. Ten of 11 measured soil properties differed significantly between remnants and intact-forest reference sites, for both fenced and unfenced remnants, at both edge and interior. For seven variables, the magnitude of effects scaled significantly with magnitude of surrounding land-use intensity, through complex interactions with fencing and edge effects. In particular, total C, total N, δ 15N, total P and heavy-metal contaminants of phosphate fertilizers (Cd and U) increased significantly within remnants in response to increasing land-use intensity, and these effects were exacerbated in unfenced relative to fenced remnants. This suggests movement of livestock into surrounding natural habitats is a significant component of agricultural spillover, but pervasive changes in soil biogeochemistry still occur through nutrient spillover channels alone, even in fenced remnants set aside for conservation. These results have important implications for the viability of land-sparing as a strategy for balancing landscape-level conservation and production goals in agricultural landscapes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Farming and the fate of wild nature.

          World food demand is expected to more than double by 2050. Decisions about how to meet this challenge will have profound effects on wild species and habitats. We show that farming is already the greatest extinction threat to birds (the best known taxon), and its adverse impacts look set to increase, especially in developing countries. Two competing solutions have been proposed: wildlife-friendly farming (which boosts densities of wild populations on farmland but may decrease agricultural yields) and land sparing (which minimizes demand for farmland by increasing yield). We present a model that identifies how to resolve the trade-off between these approaches. This shows that the best type of farming for species persistence depends on the demand for agricultural products and on how the population densities of different species on farmland change with agricultural yield. Empirical data on such density-yield functions are sparse, but evidence from a range of taxa in developing countries suggests that high-yield farming may allow more species to persist.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties.

            Expansion and intensification of cultivation are among the predominant global changes of this century. Intensification of agriculture by use of high-yielding crop varieties, fertilization,irrigation, and pesticides has contributed substantially to the tremendous increases in food production over the past 50 years. Land conversion and intensification,however, also alter the biotic interactions and patterns of resource availability in ecosystems and can have serious local, regional, and global environmental consequences.The use of ecologically based management strategies can increase the sustainability of agricultural production while reducing off-site consequences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.

              The question of how to meet rising food demand at the least cost to biodiversity requires the evaluation of two contrasting alternatives: land sharing, which integrates both objectives on the same land; and land sparing, in which high-yield farming is combined with protecting natural habitats from conversion to agriculture. To test these alternatives, we compared crop yields and densities of bird and tree species across gradients of agricultural intensity in southwest Ghana and northern India. More species were negatively affected by agriculture than benefited from it, particularly among species with small global ranges. For both taxa in both countries, land sparing is a more promising strategy for minimizing negative impacts of food production, at both current and anticipated future levels of production.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2015
                9 January 2015
                : 10
                : 1
                : e0116474
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
                [2 ]CSIRO Land & Water Flagship, Perth, Australia
                [3 ]Landcare Research, Hamilton, New Zealand
                [4 ]Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [5 ]Forests and Livelihoods Programme, CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia
                [6 ]Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
                [7 ]Institute of Agriculture, School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
                [8 ]Science and Capability Group, Department of Conservation, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [9 ]Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, United Kingdom
                [10 ]School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
                [11 ]Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
                USDA-ARS, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: RKD GMB SB ELD JMRP JMT LAS. Performed the experiments: RKD SB ELD LHD LMF JMRP HRW LAS. Analyzed the data: RKD GMB ELD JMT. Wrote the paper: RKD GMB ELD LHD LMF JMT LAS.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-27499
                10.1371/journal.pone.0116474
                4289067
                25575017
                f2cf9ca5-c707-4885-ae25-0649450dd5dd
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 27 June 2014
                : 9 December 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 32
                Funding
                Funding for the study was provided by the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden grant UOC0803. RKD was supported during the writing of the manuscript by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT100100040. JMT was supported during the writing of this manuscript by a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship, administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article