4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cells and material-based strategies for regenerative endodontics

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class = "Abstract" style = "margin: 0 cm; line-height: 32px; font-size: 12 pt; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); "><span lang = "EN-US">The carious process leads to inflammation of pulp tissue. Current care options include root canal treatment or apexification. These procedures, however, result in the loss of tooth vitality, sensitivity, and healing. Pulp capping and dental pulp regeneration are continually evolving techniques to regenerate pulp tissue, avoiding necrosis and loss of vitality. Many studies have successfully employed stem/progenitor cell populations, revascularization approaches, scaffolds or material-based strategies for pulp regeneration. Here we outline advantages and disadvantages of different methods and techniques which are currently being used in the field of regenerative endodontics. We also summarize recent findings on efficacious peptide-based materials which target the dental niche.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Pulp infection necessitates removal of necrotic, inflamed and infected tissue.

          • Materials used clinically are inert (such as gutta percha, mineral trioxide aggregate).

          • Recent developments in materials (angiogenic hydrogels, stem cell composites) have tuneable bioactivity.

          • Dental pulp regeneration may now be possible through the use of bioactive systems, that guide regeneration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references189

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo.

          Dentinal repair in the postnatal organism occurs through the activity of specialized cells, odontoblasts, that are thought to be maintained by an as yet undefined precursor population associated with pulp tissue. In this study, we isolated a clonogenic, rapidly proliferative population of cells from adult human dental pulp. These DPSCs were then compared with human bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), known precursors of osteoblasts. Although they share a similar immunophenotype in vitro, functional studies showed that DPSCs produced only sporadic, but densely calcified nodules, and did not form adipocytes, whereas BMSCs routinely calcified throughout the adherent cell layer with clusters of lipid-laden adipocytes. When DPSCs were transplanted into immunocompromised mice, they generated a dentin-like structure lined with human odontoblast-like cells that surrounded a pulp-like interstitial tissue. In contrast, BMSCs formed lamellar bone containing osteocytes and surface-lining osteoblasts, surrounding a fibrous vascular tissue with active hematopoiesis and adipocytes. This study isolates postnatal human DPSCs that have the ability to form a dentin/pulp-like complex.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine.

            To date, 5 different human dental stem/progenitor cells have been isolated and characterized: dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED), periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), stem cells from apical papilla (SCAP), and dental follicle progenitor cells (DFPCs). These postnatal populations have mesenchymal-stem-cell-like (MSC) qualities, including the capacity for self-renewal and multilineage differentiation potential. MSCs derived from bone marrow (BMMSCs) are capable of giving rise to various lineages of cells, such as osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic, myogenic, and neurogenic cells. The dental-tissue-derived stem cells are isolated from specialized tissue with potent capacities to differentiate into odontogenic cells. However, they also have the ability to give rise to other cell lineages similar to, but different in potency from, that of BMMSCs. This article will review the isolation and characterization of the properties of different dental MSC-like populations in comparison with those of other MSCs, such as BMMSCs. Important issues in stem cell biology, such as stem cell niche, homing, and immunoregulation, will also be discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Degradable Controlled-Release Polymers and Polymeric Nanoparticles: Mechanisms of Controlling Drug Release.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Bioact Mater
                Bioact Mater
                Bioactive Materials
                KeAi Publishing
                2452-199X
                30 November 2021
                August 2022
                30 November 2021
                : 14
                : 234-249
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA
                [b ]Department of Oral Biology, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA
                [c ]Department of Endodontics, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA
                [d ]Department of Chemicals and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA
                [e ]Department of Biology, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Department of Oral Biology, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. shimize1@ 123456sdm.rutgers.edu
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. vak@ 123456njit.edu
                [1]

                Indicates these authors contributed equally as co-first authorship.

                Article
                S2452-199X(21)00536-3
                10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.015
                8897646
                35310358
                f2aa9ad8-4e81-4220-8f2e-de36c357d9e9
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 April 2021
                : 29 October 2021
                : 9 November 2021
                Categories
                Article

                regenerative endodontics,pulp regeneration,tissue engineering,stem cells,scaffolds

                Comments

                Comment on this article