21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      IntAct: intra‐operative fluorescence angiography to prevent anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          Anastomotic leak (AL) is a major complication of rectal cancer surgery. Despite advances in surgical practice, the rates of AL have remained static, at around 10–15%. The aetiology of AL is multifactorial, but one of the most crucial risk factors, which is mostly under the control of the surgeon, is blood supply to the anastomosis. The MRC/NIHR IntAct study will determine whether assessment of anastomotic perfusion using a fluorescent dye (indocyanine green) and near‐infrared laparoscopy can minimize the rate of AL leak compared with conventional white‐light laparoscopy. Two mechanistic sub‐studies will explore the role of the rectal microbiome in AL and the predictive value of CT angiography/perfusion studies.

          Method

          IntAct is a prospective, unblinded, parallel‐group, multicentre, European, randomized controlled trial comparing surgery with intra‐operative fluorescence angiography (IFA) against standard care (surgery with no IFA). The primary end‐point is rate of clinical AL at 90 days following surgery. Secondary end‐points include all AL (clinical and radiological), change in planned anastomosis, complications and re‐interventions, use of stoma, cost‐effectiveness of the intervention and quality of life. Patients should have a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum suitable for potentially curative surgery by anterior resection. Over 3 years, 880 patients from 25 European centres will be recruited and followed up for 90 days.

          Discussion

          IntAct will rigorously evaluate the use of IFA in rectal cancer surgery and explore the role of the microbiome in AL and the predictive value of preoperative CT angiography/perfusion scanning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer.

            Anastomotic leakage represents a major complication after anterior resection of the rectum. The incidence of anastomotic leakage varies considerably among clinical studies in part owing to the lack of a standardized definition of this complication. The aim of the present article was to propose a definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection. After a literature review a consensus definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage was developed within the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Anastomotic leakage should be defined as a defect of the intestinal wall at the anastomotic site (including suture and staple lines of neorectal reservoirs) leading to a communication between the intra- and extraluminal compartments. Severity of anastomotic leakage should be graded according to the impact on clinical management. Grade A anastomotic leakage results in no change in patients' management, whereas grade B leakage requires active therapeutic intervention but is manageable without re-laparotomy. Grade C anastomotic leakage requires re-laparotomy. The proposed definition and clinical grading is applicable easily in the setting of clinical studies. It should be applied in future reports to facilitate valid comparison of the results of different studies. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial

              Summary Background Preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer. However, improvements in surgery and histopathological assessment mean that the role of radiotherapy needs to be reassessed. We compared short-course preoperative radiotherapy versus initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Methods We undertook a randomised trial in 80 centres in four countries. 1350 patients with operable adenocarcinoma of the rectum were randomly assigned, by a minimisation procedure, to short-course preoperative radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions; n=674) or to initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent 5-fluorouracil) restricted to patients with involvement of the circumferential resection margin (n=676). The primary outcome measure was local recurrence. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 28785842. Findings At the time of analysis, which included all participants, 330 patients had died (157 preoperative radiotherapy group vs 173 selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy), and median follow-up of surviving patients was 4 years. 99 patients had developed local recurrence (27 preoperative radiotherapy vs 72 selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy). We noted a reduction of 61% in the relative risk of local recurrence for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·39, 95% CI 0·27–0·58, p<0·0001), and an absolute difference at 3 years of 6·2% (95% CI 5·3–7·1) (4·4% preoperative radiotherapy vs 10·6% selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy). We recorded a relative improvement in disease-free survival of 24% for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy (HR 0·76, 95% CI 0·62–0·94, p=0·013), and an absolute difference at 3 years of 6·0% (95% CI 5·3–6·8) (77·5% vs 71·5%). Overall survival did not differ between the groups (HR 0·91, 95% CI 0·73–1·13, p=0·40). Interpretation Taken with results from other randomised trials, our findings provide convincing and consistent evidence that short-course preoperative radiotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer. Funding Medical Research Council (UK) and the National Cancer Institute of Canada.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                g.armstrong1@leeds.ac.uk
                Journal
                Colorectal Dis
                Colorectal Dis
                10.1111/(ISSN)1463-1318
                CODI
                Colorectal Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1462-8910
                1463-1318
                08 June 2018
                August 2018
                : 20
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1111/codi.2018.20.issue-8 )
                : O226-O234
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] St James’ University Hospital Leeds UK
                [ 2 ] Clinical Trials Research Unit Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research University of Leeds Leeds UK
                [ 3 ] School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London and Honorary Consultant Radiologist Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
                [ 4 ] University of Leeds Leeds UK
                [ 5 ] Academic Unit of Health Economics Leeds Institute of Health Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK
                [ 6 ] Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust Leeds UK
                [ 7 ] University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
                [ 8 ] St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
                [ 9 ] St Mark's Hospital London UK
                [ 10 ] Derriford Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust Plymouth UK
                [ 11 ] Leeds Institute of Biological and Clinical Sciences St James's University Hospital Leeds UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Gemma Armstrong, Clinical Research Fellow, Level 7, Clinical Sciences Building, St James’ University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

                Email: g.armstrong1@ 123456leeds.ac.uk

                Article
                CODI14257
                10.1111/codi.14257
                6099475
                29751360
                f29aec23-1b1a-4ed9-b43e-e1b616411fd6
                © 2018 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 December 2017
                : 02 May 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 9, Words: 5641
                Funding
                Funded by: Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme
                Award ID: 14/150/62
                Funded by: MRC
                Funded by: NIHR
                Funded by: CSO in Scotland and Health and Care Research Wales
                Funded by: HSC R&D Division, Public Health Agency in Northern Ireland
                Categories
                Trial Protocol
                Trial Protocol
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                codi14257
                August 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.4.4 mode:remove_FC converted:20.08.2018

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                intra‐operative fluorescence angiography,resection,rectal cancer,anastomotic leak,randomized controlled trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article