8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Baseline susceptibility of an A1 quarantine pest - the South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) to insecticides: past incidents and future probabilities in line to implementing successful pest management

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tomato is a widely cultivated crop significant for its economic and nutritional benefits. The South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta, originated in Peru South America and has invaded many nations, causing up to 100% yield loss in tomatoes. The pest was classified as a quarantine pest by the European Plant Protection Organization, before invading the Spain region. Later, this quarantine pest also invaded other regions of Europe, Africa and Asian countries. Invasive insect pests cause global economic losses of 70 billion dollars annually. Among the several management measures suggested against pests, insecticides are the primary method in practice among growers due to significant results, easier operations, and other crucial advantages. Anyhow, repeated application of insecticides has caused the pest to evolve resistance against most of the insecticides in vogue, resulting in a chain of events like management failures, using increased doses of insecticides, intensified chemical residues in the food chain, and irreparable environmental contamination. Major insecticides globally used to control T. absoluta belong to organophosphates, synthetic pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, diamides, avermectins, spinosyns, and oxadizines. Understanding the baseline susceptibility of pests to insecticides helps for better pest management options and is the same for T. absoluta populations to insecticides. The current review paper discusses the T. absoluta distribution, biology, spread, host range, baseline insecticide susceptibility, global insecticide resistance status, and possible management inputs based on our understanding of insecticide susceptibility. The pest can be managed with integrated insecticide resistance management including molecular approaches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          IRAC: Mode of action classification and insecticide resistance management.

          Insecticide resistance is a long standing and expanding problem for pest arthropod control. Effective insecticide resistance management (IRM) is essential if the utility of current and future insecticides is to be preserved. Established in 1984, the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) is an international association of crop protection companies. IRAC serves as the Specialist Technical Group within CropLife International focused on ensuring the long term efficacy of insect, mite and tick control products through effective resistance management for sustainable agriculture and improved public health. A key function of IRAC is the continued development of the Mode of Action (MoA) classification scheme, which provides up-to-date information on the modes of action of new and established insecticides and acaricides and which serves as the basis for developing appropriate IRM strategies for crop protection and vector control. The IRAC MoA classification scheme covers more than 25 different modes of action and at least 55 different chemical classes. Diversity is the spice of resistance management by chemical means and thus it provides an approach to IRM providing a straightforward means to identify potential rotation/alternation options.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Impact of Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses on Plant Growth and Avenues for Crop Improvement by Exploiting Physio-morphological Traits

            Global warming leads to the concurrence of a number of abiotic and biotic stresses, thus affecting agricultural productivity. Occurrence of abiotic stresses can alter plant–pest interactions by enhancing host plant susceptibility to pathogenic organisms, insects, and by reducing competitive ability with weeds. On the contrary, some pests may alter plant response to abiotic stress factors. Therefore, systematic studies are pivotal to understand the effect of concurrent abiotic and biotic stress conditions on crop productivity. However, to date, a collective database on the occurrence of various stress combinations in agriculturally prominent areas is not available. This review attempts to assemble published information on this topic, with a particular focus on the impact of combined drought and pathogen stresses on crop productivity. In doing so, this review highlights some agriculturally important morpho-physiological traits that can be utilized to identify genotypes with combined stress tolerance. In addition, this review outlines potential role of recent genomic tools in deciphering combined stress tolerance in plants. This review will, therefore, be helpful for agronomists and field pathologists in assessing the impact of the interactions between drought and plant-pathogens on crop performance. Further, the review will be helpful for physiologists and molecular biologists to design agronomically relevant strategies for the development of broad spectrum stress tolerant crops.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2417193Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2375840Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2800924Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2067222Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2694973Role:
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                26 August 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1404250
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University , Coimbatore, India
                [2] 2 Controller of Examinations, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University , Coimbatore, India
                [3] 3 Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University , Coimbatore, India
                Author notes

                Edited by: Eustachio Tarasco, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy

                Reviewed by: Ahmed A. A. Aioub, Zagazig University, Egypt

                Antonio Figueira, University of São Paulo, Brazil

                *Correspondence: Marimuthu Murugan, entomurugan@ 123456rediffmail.com
                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2024.1404250
                11404364
                39286840
                f1c29bb7-734e-442d-886f-c5d4ef376ea8
                Copyright © 2024 Bavithra, Murugan, Balasubramani, Harish and Prakash

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 20 March 2024
                : 18 July 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 14, Words: 6976
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Plant Pathogen Interactions

                Plant science & Botany
                tomato pinworm,baseline susceptibility,insecticide resistance,resistance ratio,insecticide resistance management

                Comments

                Comment on this article