Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An online self-care education program to support patients after total laryngectomy: feasibility and satisfaction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of an online self-care education program supporting early rehabilitation of patients after total laryngectomy (TLPs) and factors associated with satisfaction.

          Methods

          Health care professionals (HCPs) were invited to participate and to recruit TLPs. TLPs were informed on the self-care education program “In Tune without Cords” (ITwC) after which they gained access. A study specific survey was used (at baseline T0 and postintervention T1) on TLPs’ uptake. Usage, satisfaction (general impression, willingness to use, user-friendliness, satisfaction with self-care advice and strategies, Net Promoter Score (NPS)), sociodemographic, and clinical factors were analyzed.

          Results

          HCPs of 6 out of 9 centers (67 % uptake rate) agreed to participate and recruited TLPs. In total, 55 of 75 TLPs returned informed consent and the baseline T0 survey and were provided access to ITwC (73 % uptake rate). Thirty-eight of these 55 TLPs used ITwC and completed the T1 survey (69 % usage rate). Most (66 %) TLPs were satisfied (i.e., score ≥7 (scale 1–10) on 4 survey items) with the self-care education program (mean score 7.2, SD 1.1). NPS was positive (+5). Satisfaction with the self-care education program was significantly associated with (higher) educational level and health literacy skills ( P = .004, P = .038, respectively). No significant association was found with gender, age, marital status, employment status, Internet use, Internet literacy, treatment modality, time since total laryngectomy, and quality of life.

          Conclusion

          The online self-care education program ITwC supporting early rehabilitation was feasible in clinical practice. In general, TLPs were satisfied with the program.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients.

          Health literacy (HL), the capacity of individuals to access, understand, and use health information to make informed and appropriate health-related decisions, has been recognized as an important concept in patient education and disease management. This study examined the psychometric properties of newly developed scales for measuring three different levels of HL (i.e., functional, communicative, and critical) in patients with diabetes. The reliability and validity of the three HL scales were evaluated in a sample of 138 outpatients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge of diabetes, information-seeking behaviors, and self-efficacy were assessed for each patient through a self-report questionnaire and review of electronic medical records. Scale items were constructed to directly reflect the definition of HL. Internal consistency of functional, communicative, and critical HL scales was adequately high (alpha = 0.84, alpha = 0.77, and alpha = 0.65, respectively). Three interpretable factors were identified in exploratory factor analysis. Correlations between HL scales and other measures supported the construct validity of the scales. The three HL scales were only moderately correlated with each other, suggesting that each represents a different domain of HL abilities and skills. Our newly developed HL scales are reliable and valid measures of three types of HL in diabetic patients. Exploring a patient's HL levels may provide a better understanding of the patient's potential barriers to self-management of disease and health-promoting behaviors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Review of health information technology usability study methodologies

            Usability factors are a major obstacle to health information technology (IT) adoption. The purpose of this paper is to review and categorize health IT usability study methods and to provide practical guidance on health IT usability evaluation. 2025 references were initially retrieved from the Medline database from 2003 to 2009 that evaluated health IT used by clinicians. Titles and abstracts were first reviewed for inclusion. Full-text articles were then examined to identify final eligibility studies. 629 studies were categorized into the five stages of an integrated usability specification and evaluation framework that was based on a usability model and the system development life cycle (SDLC)-associated stages of evaluation. Theoretical and methodological aspects of 319 studies were extracted in greater detail and studies that focused on system validation (SDLC stage 2) were not assessed further. The number of studies by stage was: stage 1, task-based or user–task interaction, n=42; stage 2, system–task interaction, n=310; stage 3, user–task–system interaction, n=69; stage 4, user–task–system–environment interaction, n=54; and stage 5, user–task–system–environment interaction in routine use, n=199. The studies applied a variety of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Methodological issues included lack of theoretical framework/model, lack of details regarding qualitative study approaches, single evaluation focus, environmental factors not evaluated in the early stages, and guideline adherence as the primary outcome for decision support system evaluations. Based on the findings, a three-level stratified view of health IT usability evaluation is proposed and methodological guidance is offered based upon the type of interaction that is of primary interest in the evaluation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

              In forming its Quality of Life Group, the EORTC created one of the earliest and largest of such groups in Europe. The EORTC QLQ-C30 which this group developed has become the most widely used questionnaire in Europe for cancer patients, and is extensively used around the world. The Quality of Life Group continues to build upon this success, both by refining the QLQ-C30, whilst developing a range of additional modules, and by initiating research projects that explore aspects of quality of life assessment, evaluation and interpretation. We review the progress to date and indicate directions of further research and development.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-20-4440931 , im.verdonck@vumc.nl
                Journal
                Support Care Cancer
                Support Care Cancer
                Supportive Care in Cancer
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0941-4355
                1433-7339
                26 August 2015
                26 August 2015
                2016
                : 24
                : 1261-1268
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center (Radboud UMC), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), PO Box 30001, 9700 RD Groningen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden (MCL), PO Box 888, 8901 BR Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center (UMCU), PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                2896
                10.1007/s00520-015-2896-1
                4729815
                26306518
                f19e84fe-8bee-439e-a54f-31d1b6442369
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 27 March 2015
                : 9 August 2015
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                laryngeal cancer,total laryngectomy,ehealth,self-care
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                laryngeal cancer, total laryngectomy, ehealth, self-care

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content552

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors481