26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cohesin and Polycomb Proteins Functionally Interact to Control Transcription at Silenced and Active Genes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cohesin is crucial for proper chromosome segregation but also regulates gene transcription and organism development by poorly understood mechanisms. Using genome-wide assays in Drosophila developing wings and cultured cells, we find that cohesin functionally interacts with Polycomb group (PcG) silencing proteins at both silenced and active genes. Cohesin unexpectedly facilitates binding of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to many active genes, but their binding is mutually antagonistic at silenced genes. PRC1 depletion decreases phosphorylated RNA polymerase II and mRNA at many active genes but increases them at silenced genes. Depletion of cohesin reduces long-range interactions between Polycomb Response Elements in the invected-engrailed gene complex where it represses transcription. These studies reveal a previously unrecognized role for PRC1 in facilitating productive gene transcription and provide new insights into how cohesin and PRC1 control development.

          Author Summary

          An important task for the cohesin protein complex that binds chromosomes is to ensure equal distribution of chromosomes into the daughter cells when a cell divides. Small changes in cohesin activity, however, can alter gene activity without affecting chromosome distribution, and disrupt physical and mental development. How cohesin controls gene activity and development is not well understood. In this study we show that cohesin controls the binding of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to many genes. PRC1 silences many genes that control development. Surprisingly, we find that cohesin aids binding of PRC1 to active genes, where PRC1 ensures that RNA polymerase, the enzyme that transcribes genes, is properly modified before entering the gene body. We also find that cohesin antagonizes the binding and activity of PRC1 at genes silenced by PRC1, and can influence interactions between the DNA sequences that recruit PRC1 and other Polycomb complexes to silenced genes. These findings provide new and unexpected insights into how both cohesin and PRC1 control gene activity during development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila

          Summary Chromatin is composed of DNA and a variety of modified histones and non-histone proteins, which impact cell differentiation, gene regulation and other key cellular processes. We present a genome-wide chromatin landscape for Drosophila melanogaster based on 18 histone modifications, summarized by 9 prevalent combinatorial patterns. Integrative analysis with other data (non-histone chromatin proteins, DNaseI hypersensitivity, GRO-seq reads produced by engaged polymerase, short/long RNA products) reveals discrete characteristics of chromosomes, genes, regulatory elements, and other functional domains. We find that active genes display distinct chromatin signatures that are correlated with disparate gene lengths, exon patterns, regulatory functions, and genomic contexts. We also demonstrate a diversity of signatures among Polycomb targets that include a subset with paused polymerase. This systematic profiling and integrative analysis of chromatin signatures provides insights into how genomic elements are regulated, and will serve as a resource for future experimental investigations of genome structure and function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Controlling the elongation phase of transcription with P-TEFb.

            The positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) is a cyclin-dependent kinase that controls the elongation phase of transcription by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). This process is made possible by the reversal of effects of negative elongation factors that include NELF and DSIF. In complex organisms, elongation control is critical for the regulated expression of most genes. In those organisms, the function of P-TEFb is influenced negatively by HEXIM proteins and 7SK snRNA and positively by a variety of recruiting factors. Phylogenetic analyses of the components of the human elongation control machinery indicate that the number of mechanisms utilized to regulate P-TEFb function increased as organisms developed more complex developmental patterns.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ring1-mediated ubiquitination of H2A restrains poised RNA polymerase II at bivalent genes in mouse ES cells.

              Changes in phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (RNAP) are associated with transcription initiation, elongation and termination. Sites of active transcription are generally characterized by hyperphosphorylated RNAP, particularly at Ser 2 residues, whereas inactive or poised genes may lack RNAP or may bind Ser 5-phosphorylated RNAP at promoter proximal regions. Recent studies have demonstrated that silent developmental regulator genes have an unusual histone modification profile in ES cells, being simultaneously marked with Polycomb repressor-mediated histone H3K27 methylation, and marks normally associated with gene activity. Contrary to the prevailing view, we show here that this important subset of developmental regulator genes, termed bivalent genes, assemble RNAP complexes phosphorylated on Ser 5 and are transcribed at low levels. We provide evidence that this poised RNAP configuration is enforced by Polycomb Repressor Complex (PRC)-mediated ubiquitination of H2A, as conditional deletion of Ring1A and Ring1B leads to the sequential loss of ubiquitination of H2A, release of poised RNAP, and subsequent gene de-repression. These observations provide an insight into the molecular mechanisms that allow ES cells to self-renew and yet retain the ability to generate multiple lineage outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                June 2013
                June 2013
                20 June 2013
                : 9
                : 6
                : e1003560
                Affiliations
                [1]Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
                Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CAS ZM DD. Performed the experiments: CAS ZM MG AK AW. Analyzed the data: CAS DD AK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DWG. Wrote the paper: CAS DD.

                Article
                PGENETICS-D-13-00135
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1003560
                3688520
                23818863
                f0b55a05-1ed4-42a2-8f75-dc344cd6bf2f
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 January 2013
                : 24 April 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Funding
                This work was supported by NIH grants R01 GM055683 and P01 HD052860 (DD) ( www.nih.gov/), and a Saint Louis University Presidential Fellowship (CAS) ( www.slu.edu/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Computational Biology
                Genomics
                Epigenomics
                Molecular Genetics
                Gene Regulation
                Gene Expression
                Microarrays
                Genetics
                Epigenetics
                Histone Modification
                Chromatin
                Gene Expression
                DNA transcription
                Histone Modification
                Chromatin
                Molecular Genetics
                Gene Regulation
                Animal Genetics
                Genomics
                Functional Genomics
                Genome Expression Analysis
                Model Organisms
                Animal Models
                Drosophila Melanogaster

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content38

                Cited by47

                Most referenced authors797